China-U. S. A Trade Friction on Bilateral Trade

1
Most. Ayasha Siddiqua
Most. Ayasha Siddiqua
1 Begum Rokeya University

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 19 Issue B3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

67Y18

China-U. S. A Trade Friction on Bilateral Trade Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This study is typically descriptive that has been analyses through different componential data of the Chinse and U.S.A. economy about the bilateral trade issues. The objective of the paper is to analyze and find the friction areas of Chinese and USA trade and implications. U.S.A-China change friction is dampening the Chinese financial system, through a decline in the call for. Over the medium to a long time, the alternate row should depress China’s capability economic growth price via supply-aspect elements. The United States are strengthening regulations on acquisitions of U.S. excessive-tech companies by means of Chinese businesses. This, mixed with strengthened capital manage in China, has brought about a steep decline in Chinese direct investments inside America, from 46 billion bucks in 2016 to 29 billion dollars in 2017 to 4.8 billion dollars in appearing time will make it more and more tough for China to acquire technology and others from the U.S.A. China and America have discovered bilateral treaties and multilateral regulations which includes the WTO guidelines, economic and trade family members have grown deeper and wider.

19 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Chad Bown,Bernard Hoekman,Caglar Ozden (2009). The pattern of US antidumping: the path from initial filing to WTO dispute settlement.
  2. C Bown,R Mcculloch (2009). US-Japan and US-China trade conflict: Export growth, reciprocity, and the international trading system.
  3. H David,D Dorn,G Hanson (2013). The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States.
  4. A Friedberg (2005). The future of US-China relations: Is conflict inevitable?.
  5. Michael Ferrantino,Xuepeng Liu,Zhi Wang (2012). Evasion behaviors of exporters and importers: Evidence from the U.S.–China trade data discrepancy.
  6. S Guobing (2005). Trade Statistical Discrepancies and US-China Trade Balance Issues.
  7. Robert Feenstra,Wen Hai,Wing Woo,Shunli Yao (1998). The US-China Bilateral Trade Balance: Its Size and Determinants.
  8. F Zhu-Ying (2008). Empirical Study on the Impact of US FDI on China-US Bilateral Trade Imbalances.
  9. (2019). Country statistical profile: United Kingdom 2019/4.
  10. (2019). Corporate Profile: General Motors.
  11. (2019). Unctad.org.
  12. (2019). Data.
  13. (2019). of GDP) | Data.
  14. Hsing-Hung Cheng,Sung-Wei Chen,Jen-Wei Chou (2019). A rare cause of rectal bleeding.
  15. (2017). Figure 6.19. Exports and imports by partner country, selected countries.
  16. Anon (2019). Welcome Message from the FAS Workshops and Tutorials Chairs.
  17. (2019). Datacatalog.
  18. (2019). Bea.
  19. Ministry,People's Republic Of Commerce,China (2019). Questionnaire – China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM).

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Most. Ayasha Siddiqua. 2019. \u201cChina-U. S. A Trade Friction on Bilateral Trade\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - B: Economic & Commerce GJMBR-B Volume 19 (GJMBR Volume 19 Issue B3): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 19 Issue B3
Pg. 27- 37
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-B Classification: JEL Code: F63
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 7, 2019

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2530
Total Downloads: 1377
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

This study is typically descriptive that has been analyses through different componential data of the Chinse and U.S.A. economy about the bilateral trade issues. The objective of the paper is to analyze and find the friction areas of Chinese and USA trade and implications. U.S.A-China change friction is dampening the Chinese financial system, through a decline in the call for. Over the medium to a long time, the alternate row should depress China’s capability economic growth price via supply-aspect elements. The United States are strengthening regulations on acquisitions of U.S. excessive-tech companies by means of Chinese businesses. This, mixed with strengthened capital manage in China, has brought about a steep decline in Chinese direct investments inside America, from 46 billion bucks in 2016 to 29 billion dollars in 2017 to 4.8 billion dollars in appearing time will make it more and more tough for China to acquire technology and others from the U.S.A. China and America have discovered bilateral treaties and multilateral regulations which includes the WTO guidelines, economic and trade family members have grown deeper and wider.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

China-U. S. A Trade Friction on Bilateral Trade

Most. Ayasha Siddiqua
Most. Ayasha Siddiqua Begum Rokeya University

Research Journals