Loading menu…

Civil Society in Development: How Platform Groups Politicized EPA Negotiation between EU and West Africa

ยง Obafemi Awolowo University

Send Message

To: Author

Civil Society in Development: How Platform Groups Politicized EPA Negotiation between EU and West Africa

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

WI7T7

Civil Society in Development: How Platform Groups Politicized EPA Negotiation between EU and West Africa Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The core trajectory of this essay is to explore further the transformative power of civil society as advanced in by neo-Gramscian scholars by looking closely at how platform civil society groups organized in transnational networks politicized the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) negotiation process between the EU and West Africa. The paper argued that platform groups politicized the EPA negotiation process by drawing attention to the potential development implications of concluding EPA with the EU for West Africa in particular and African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) regions in general. Two questions are raised in the paper, the first of which addressed why platform civil society groups in West Africa contested the EPA. The second question engaged with how platform groups organized and mobilized action across national borders and regional divide for this purpose. The paper argued that platform groups in West Africa became resistant to EPA and organized mainly to block its ratification because EPAs are generally perceived to have a neoliberal undertone that potentially challenges African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countriesโ€™ prospects for socioeconomic development.

References

68 Cites in Article
  1. 1. K Armstrong (2002). Rediscovering civil society: The European Union and the white paper on governance. European Journal of Law, 8(1), 102-132.
  2. 2. Srilatha Batliwala (2002). Grassroots Movements as Transnational Actors: Implications for Global Civil Society. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(4), 393-409.
  3. 3. (2009). Loss of EU Preferences โ€“ The Broad Picture for Individual CARIFORUM States. Economic Paper, 123-127.
  4. 4. S Bilal,F Rampa,F Jerosch,D &makhan (2007). Monitoring Economic Partnership Agreements: A methodological overview. InBrief, 18
  5. 5. S Bilal (2009). Economic Partnership Agreements: To be or not to be?. Updating Economic Partnership Agreements to today's global challenges: Essays on the future of Economic Partnership Agreements, 33-43.
  6. 6. Jean Bossuyt (2006). Mainstreaming Civil Society in ACP-EU Development Cooperation. New Pathways in International Development, 123-138.
  7. 7. (2012). ACP calls for flexibility on trade negotiations with the EU. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development: Bridges Africa
  8. 8. Bridges Weekl (2010). Wine classifications by EU country. Trade News Digest, 14(12)
  9. 9. J Byron,P Lewis (2007). Formulating sustainable development benchmarks for an EU-CARIFORUM EPA: Caribbean perspectives. Formulating sustainable development benchmarks for an EU-CARIFORUM EPA: Caribbean perspectives
  10. 10. Simone Chambers,Jeffrey Kopstein (2001). Bad Civil Society. Political Theory, 29(6), 837-865.
  11. 11. Neera Chandhoke (2007). Civil society. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 607-614.
  12. 12. Emma Humpidge (2003). A moral critique of development: in search of global responsibilities edited by Philip Quarles van Ufford and Ananta Kumar Giri (London: Routledge for EIDOS, 2003, pp. 309). Worlds apart: civil society and the battle for ethical globalization by John Clark (London: Earthscan, 2003, pp. 304). Globalizing civic engagement: civil society and transnational action edited by John Clark (London: Earthscan, 2003, pp. 208). Journal of International Development, 17(8), 1099-1103.
  13. 13. Andrea Cornwall (2007). Introduction: New Democratic Spaces? The Politics and Dynamics of Institutionalised Participation. IDS Bulletin, 48(1A)
  14. 14. (2000). V.C.12 PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MEMBERS OF THE AFRICAN, CARIBBEAN AND PACIFIC GROUP OF STATES OF THE ONE PART, AND THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND ITS MEMBER STATES, OF THE OTHER PART (23 June 2000). V.C.12 PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MEMBERS OF THE AFRICAN, CARIBBEAN AND PACIFIC GROUP OF STATES OF THE ONE PART, AND THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND ITS MEMBER STATES, OF THE OTHER PART (23 June 2000)
  15. 15. R Cox (1996). Gramsci, hegemony, and international relations: an essay in method (1983). Approaches to World Order, 124-143.
  16. 16. Robert Cox,Michael Schechter (2002). The Political Economy of a Plural World. The Political Economy of a Plural World, 96-106.
  17. 17. Gordon Crawford (2006). The European Union and Strengthening Civil Society in Africa. New Pathways in International Development, 139-158.
  18. 18. A Dur,D De Bievre (2007). Inclusion without influence? NGOs in European trade policy. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 79-101.
  19. 19. Richard Ilorah,Collins Ngwakwe (2014). Economic Partnership Agreements between African-Caribbean-Pacific countries and the European Union: revisiting contested issues. Journal of African Business, 16(3), 322-338.
  20. 20. M Edwards,D Hulme (2000). Scaling up NGO impact on development: learning from experience. Development, NGOs, and civil society: Selected essays from development in practice, 44-46.
  21. 21. Olufemi Babarinde,Gerrit Faber (2005). From Lomรฉ to Cotonou: ACP-EU Partnership in Transition. The European Union and the Developing Countries, 1-15.
  22. 22. (2013). Articles Accessed in March 2007. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 109(6), 1263.
  23. 23. (2014). Negotiating an EUโ€“Central Africa EPA: A Brief Overview. Interviews on the role of civil society in EU-West Africa EPA negotiation
  24. 24. (2016). National Civil Society Sustainability Strategy for Civil Society in Ghana. Interviews on the role of civil society in EU-West Africa EPA negotiation
  25. 25. Ann Florini,P Simmons (2000). What the World Needs Now?. The Third Force, 1-16.
  26. 26. Michael Foley,Bob Edwards (1996). The Paradox of Civil Society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38-52.
  27. 27. Fontagnรฉ Lionel,David Laborde,Cristina Mitaritonna (2008). An impact study of the EU-ACP EPAs in the six ACP regions. An impact study of the EU-ACP EPAs in the six ACP regions, 2008-2012.
  28. 28. Alan Fowler (2012). Measuring Civil Society: Perspectives on Afro-Centrism. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(1), 5-25.
  29. 29. Francis Fukuyama (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7-20.
  30. 30. C Godfrey (2006). oxfam-briefing-note-after-the-cyclone-lessons-from-a-disaster-15-feb-2008-16-pp. oxfam-briefing-note-after-the-cyclone-lessons-from-a-disaster-15-feb-2008-16-pp
  31. 31. Stephen Hurt (2006). Civil Society and European Union Development Policy. New Pathways in International Development, 109-122.
  32. 32. Stephen Hurt,Donna Lee,Ulrike Lorenz-Carl (2013). The Argumentative Dimension to the EU-Africa EPAs. International Negotiation, 18(1), 67-87.
  33. 33. Stephen Hurt (2010). Understanding EU Development Policy: history, global context and self-interest?. Third World Quarterly, 31(1), 159-168.
  34. 34. (2016). World Economic Outlook: Subdued Demand: Symptoms and Remedies. World Economic Outlook: Subdued Demand: Symptoms and Remedies
  35. 35. K Karl (2002). ACP-EU Economic Partnership Agreements: Fisheries. Navigating New Waters, 195, 3-24.
  36. 36. John Keane (2009). Chapter 1 CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE ERA OF MONITORY DEMOCRACY. Civil Society in the Age of Monitory Democracy, 24, 22-51.
  37. 37. M Keck,K Sikkink (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics
  38. 38. R Keohane,Joseph Nye (1971). Transnational relations and world politics. Transnational relations and world politics
  39. 39. Dirk Kohnert (2015). Horse-trading on EUโ€“African Economic Partnership Agreements. Review of African Political Economy, 42(143)
  40. 40. Dirk Kohnert (2014). African Agency and EUโ€“African Economic Partnership Agreements. Africa Spectrum, 49(3), 149-155.
  41. 41. R Korzeniewicz,W Smith (2001). TRADE PROTEST NETWORKS. Building Transnational Networks, 51, 67-80.
  42. 42. R Krznaric (1999). Civil and Uncivil Actors in the Guatemalan Peace Process. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 18(1), 1-16.
  43. 43. L Kuhnhardt (2016). Maturing beyond Cotonou. Reinventing EU relations with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States. Identitรคt und Weltfรคhigkeit, 419-474.
  44. 44. Krishan Kumar (2007). Global Civil Society. European Journal of Sociology, 48(3), 413-434.
  45. 45. J Mearshiemer (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. John Mearsheimer. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001. 555 pp. $27.95. Survival, 44(3), 150-151.
  46. 46. F Miraftab (2004). Invited and invented spaces of participation: neoliberal citizenship and Feminists'expanded notion of politics. Wagadu, 1
  47. 47. Annita Montoute (2011). Deliberate or Emancipate? Civil Society Participation in Trade Policy: The Case of the CARIFORUMโ€“EU EPA. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(1), 299-321.
  48. 48. Kenneth Newton (2001). Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201-214.
  49. 49. (2013). The NORAD Agreement. NORAD, 153-158.
  50. 50. Alex Nunn,Sophia Price (2004). Managing Development: EU and African Relations through the Evolution of the Lomรฉ and Cotonou Agreements. Historical Materialism, 12(4), 203-230.
  51. 51. F Onah (2010). The Lomรฉ, Cotonou and the African-EU Strategic Partnership Agreements in comparative perspectives. Africa and Europe in the 21 st Century, 17-45.
  52. 52. C Osita (2010). Institutional framework of the African-EU Strategic Partnership Agreement. Africa and Europe in the 21 st Century, 3-16.
  53. 53. R Patman (2006). Globalization and Conflict. Globalization and conflict: National security in a 'new' strategic era
  54. 54. R Putnam (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy
  55. 55. R Putnam (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
  56. 56. J Ravenhill (1985). Collective clientelism: The Lomรฉ Conventions and North-South relations. Collective clientelism: The Lomรฉ Conventions and North-South relations
  57. 57. Jan Scholte (2002). Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 8(3), 281-304.
  58. 58. Jon Shefner (2007). Rethinking Civil Society in the Age of NAFTA: The Case of Mexico. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 182-200.
  59. 59. N Slocum-Bradley,A Bradley (2010). Is the EU's governance 'good'? An assessment of EU governance in its partnership with ACP states. Third World Quarterly, 31(1), 31-49.
  60. 60. J Smith,D Wiest (2005). The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society: National and Global Influences on Transnational Association. Social Forces, 84(2), 621-652.
  61. 61. Solignac Lecomte,Henri-Bernard (2001). Effectiveness of developing country participation in ACP-EU Negotiations. Effectiveness of developing country participation in ACP-EU Negotiations
  62. 62. Christopher Stevens (2006). The EU, Africa and Economic Partnership Agreements: unintended consequences of policy leverage. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 44(3), 441-458.
  63. 63. C Stevens (2009). Economic Partnership Agreements: The Symbol Versus the Reality. Economic Partnership Agreements: The Symbol Versus the Reality
  64. 64. (2006). Overview: European Aid, the European Development Fund and Adjusting to Economic Partnership Agreements. Economic Paper, 1-42.
  65. 65. D Thorburn,J Rapley,D King,C Campbell (2010). The Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA): Towards a new era for caribbean trade. The Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA): Towards a new era for caribbean trade
  66. 66. D Toornstra (2012). Economic Partnership Agreements EU-ACP: Facts and Key Issues, Brussels: European Parliament, Office for Promotion of Parliamentary Democracy (OPPD). Economic Partnership Agreements EU-ACP: Facts and Key Issues, Brussels: European Parliament, Office for Promotion of Parliamentary Democracy (OPPD)
  67. 67. K Waltz (1979). Theory of international politics. Theory of international politics
  68. 68. Clara Weinhardt (2015). Relational trust in international cooperation: The case of Northโ€“South trade negotiations. Journal of Trust Research, 5(1), 27-54.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

David, Ibukun David. 2019. "Civil Society in Development: How Platform Groups Politicized EPA Negotiation between EU and West Africa". Global Journal of Human-Social Science GJHSS-F Volume 19 (GJHSS Volume 19 Issue F2).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-F Classification FOR Code: 160699
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
June 6, 2019

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 819
Total Downloads: 64
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Civil Society in Development: How Platform Groups Politicized EPA Negotiation between EU and West Africa

David, David
David, David Obafemi Awolowo University