Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks in CAMEL Model in Case of Malaysia

Khasanjon Dodoev

Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks in CAMEL Model in Case of Malaysia

Khasanjon Dodoev *

Contact

Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks in CAMEL Model in Case of Malaysia

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MBRBTTOE

Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks in CAMEL Model in Case of Malaysia Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This comparative analysis aims to analyze the performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks in case of Malaysia during the period of 2006-2016. The financial performance will be measured through applying CAMEL ratio analysis. Additionally, two tailed ttest was also conducted via MS Excel in order to examine the difference in each components of CAMEL ratios between Islamic and Conventional banks. Overall, CAMEL model disclosed that there is not a significant difference in the financial performance between Islamic and Conventional banks. However, Islamic banks performed better and outstanding in terms of each component of CAMEL model compared with conventional banks. The secondary data which was collected from the financial statements of selected banking institutions. Indeed, this comparative research analysis compared the financial performance of Malaysian Islamic and Conventional banks with selected banks as samples during the study period.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Khasanjon Dodoev. 2018. "Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks in CAMEL Model in Case of Malaysia". Global Journal of Management and Business Research, Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance GJMBR-C Volume 18 (GJMBR Volume 18 Issue C6).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 18 Issue C6

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-C Classification JEL Code: E58

Submission ReceivedDecember 13, 2017
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2017
Published January 15, 2018

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 14, 2018

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices

Total Score: 148

Country: Uzbekistan

Subject: Global Journal of Management and Business Research

Authors: Khasanjon Dodoev (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 290

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1188

Total Downloads (simulated): 70

Publish Date: 2018 01, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 35 views
Month 2: 46 views
Month 3: 44 views
Month 4: 47 views
Month 5: 54 views
Month 6: 49 views
Month 7: 49 views
Month 8: 35 views
Month 9: 16 views
Month 10: 34 views
Month 11: 53 views
Month 12: 29 views
Month 13: 32 views
Month 14: 32 views
Month 15: 23 views
Month 16: 46 views
Month 17: 31 views
Month 18: 26 views
Month 19: 11 views
Month 20: 22 views
Month 21: 46 views
Month 22: 27 views
Month 23: 35 views
Month 24: 28 views
Month 25: 30 views
Month 26: 28 views
Month 27: 30 views
Month 28: 14 views
Month 29: 25 views
Month 30: 16 views
Month 31: 24 views
Month 32: 34 views
Month 33: 33 views
Month 34: 42 views
Month 35: 29 views
Month 36: 39 views
Month 37: 24 views
Month 38: 28 views
Month 39: 30 views
Month 40: 41 views
Month 41: 28 views
Month 42: 34 views
Month 43: 28 views
Month 44: 14 views
Month 45: 35 views
Month 46: 27 views
Month 47: 31 views
Month 48: 13 views
Month 49: 35 views
Month 50: 30 views
Month 51: 46 views
Month 52: 29 views
Month 53: 42 views
Month 54: 26 views
Month 55: 30 views
Month 56: 35 views
Month 57: 39 views
Month 58: 31 views
Month 59: 37 views
Month 60: 30 views
Month 61: 12 views
Month 62: 20 views
Month 63: 37 views
Month 64: 38 views
Month 65: 15 views
Month 66: 26 views
Month 67: 36 views
Month 68: 40 views
Month 69: 22 views
Month 70: 25 views
Month 71: 29 views
Month 72: 28 views
Month 73: 19 views
Month 74: 35 views
Month 75: 26 views
Month 76: 36 views
Month 77: 42 views
Month 78: 22 views
Month 79: 17 views
Month 80: 46 views
Month 81: 25 views
Month 82: 38 views
Month 83: 32 views
Month 84: 23 views
Month 85: 18 views
Month 86: 32 views
Month 87: 46 views
Month 88: 47 views
Month 89: 53 views
Month 90: 47 views
Month 91: 25 views
Month 92: 22 views
Month 93: 16 views
Month 94: 29 views
Month 95: 39 views
Month 96: 39 views
Month 97: 38 views
Month 98: 25 views
Month 99: 20 views
Month 100: 37 views
Month 101: 21 views
Month 102: 48 views
Month 103: 70 views
Month 104: 25 views

Total Views: 1.2K

Total Downloads: 70

All Trends