Comparative Analysis of Rural and Urban Start-Up Entrepreneurs in Nigeria

α
Gadi Dung Paul
Gadi Dung Paul
σ
Paul D. Gadi
Paul D. Gadi
ρ
Datong Cletus Danladi
Datong Cletus Danladi
Ѡ
Esther Bagobiri
Esther Bagobiri
α Department of Business Administration and Management, Plateau State Polytechnic Barkin Ladi Department of Business Administration and Management, Plateau State Polytechnic Barkin Ladi

Send Message

To: Author

Comparative Analysis of Rural and Urban Start-Up Entrepreneurs in Nigeria

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

05R5K

Comparative Analysis of Rural and Urban Start-Up Entrepreneurs in Nigeria Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to understand the different factors of the rate of entrepreneurial intentions in rural and urban settings. Using data from survey we test for factors that are expected to affect entrepreneurial between rural and urban areas. We assume one hypothesis; the main difference of rural and urban entrepreneurs is the different resources in two areas. The resources used in this study are individual resources and contextual resources individual resources are composed of self-efficacy and demographic characteristics, contextual resources consist of social support and economic resources. Using these independent factors, we conducted T-tests to compare different resources in rural and urban areas. The results of the analysis suggest that the difference in available individual, economic and social support resources does not explain the observed difference in entrepreneurship rate. The results also indicate that gender, ethnicity, income, and number of children in the family have different effects on entrepreneurial intentions in rural and urban settings. The results suggest that policy makers need to account for cultural or geographical differences when designing entrepreneurial educational and support programs in order to enhance the establishment of new business between rural and urban areas.

References

38 Cites in Article
  1. Albert Bandura (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory..
  2. J Baum,C Oliver (1992). Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations.
  3. David Blanchflower,Bruce Meyer (1994). A Longitudinal Analysis of Young Entrepreneurs in Australia and the United States.
  4. Candida Brush,Tatiana Manolova (2004). Household Structure.
  5. M Caree,A Stel,R Thurik,S Wennekers (2002). Economic Development and Business Ownership: an Analysis Using Data of 23 OECD Countries in the Period 1976-1996.
  6. Brush Carter (2004). Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics.
  7. C Chen,P Greene,A Crick (1998). Does Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy Distinguish Entrepreneurs from Manager?.
  8. Susan Cutter,Bryan Boruff,W Shirley (2003). Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards<sup>*</sup>.
  9. Brent Bundick,A Smith (2001). The Dynamic Effects of Forward Guidance Shocks.
  10. Edward Malecki (1993). Entrepreneurship in Regional and Local Development.
  11. (2007). Entrepreneurship-Survey of the EU25.
  12. D Evans,Linda Leighton (1989). Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship.
  13. David Evans,Boyan Jovanovic (1989). An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice under Liquidity Constraints.
  14. W Gartner,N Carter,P Reynolds (2010). Entrepreneurial Behavior: Firm Organizing Processes.
  15. W Gartner,K Shaver,N Carter,P Reynolds (2004). Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics.
  16. Edward Glaeser,Stuart Rosenthal,William Strange (2009). Urban Economics and Entrepreneurship.
  17. Patricia Greene,Radha Chaganti (2003). LEVELS OF RESOURCES FOR ETHNIC ENTREPRENEURS.
  18. Owen Greene (2004). Race & Ethnicity.
  19. Jerome Katz,William Gartner (1988). Properties of Emerging Organizations.
  20. Norris Krueger (1999). The Cognitive Infrastructure of Opportunity Emergence.
  21. Li Yu,Peter Orazem,Robert Jolly (2009). Why Do Rural Firms Live Longer?.
  22. Linda Westfall (2009). Sampling Methods: Excerpt from The Certified Software Quality Engineer Handbook.
  23. M Marshall,A Samal (2006). Annual Meeting American Farm Economic Association.
  24. K Nielsen,C Freir (2010). How Important is Geography for the Entrepreneurial Profile?.
  25. (2002). 『OECD Employment Outlook.
  26. Wlodzimierz Kolodziejczak (1994). Labour force in polish rural areas after Poland’s accession to the European Union.
  27. F Pietro (1998). Technological Change and Population Growth.
  28. Raphael Bar,- El,Daniel Felsenstein (1990). Entrepreneurship and Rural Industrialization: Comparing Urban and Rural Patterns of Locational Chioce in Israel.
  29. P Reynolds,S Camp,W Bygrave,E Autio,M Hay (2001). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2001 Executive Report.
  30. Paul Reynolds (1997). Who Starts New Firms? – Preliminary Explorations of Firms-in-Gestation.
  31. Paul Reynolds (2004). Labor Force Participation and Residential Tenure.
  32. Paul Romer (1986). Cake Eating, Chattering, and Jumps: Existence Results for Variational Problems.
  33. James Schmitz (1989). Imitation, Entrepreneurship, and Long-Run Growth.
  34. Eric Scorsone (2003). Encouraging Entrepreneurship in Rural Communities: the University of Kentucky Entrepreneurship Initiative program.
  35. A Shapero,Sokol (1982). Dimensions of Social Entrepreneurship.
  36. Sophia Stathopoulou,Demetreos Psaltopoulous,Dimitris Skuras (2004). Rural Entrepreneurship in Europe: A Research framework and agenda.
  37. Rolf Sternberg (2009). Regional Dimensions of Entrepreneurship.
  38. Sander Wennekers,Andre´ Van Stel,Roy Thurik,Paul Reynolds (2005). Nascent Entrepreneurship and the Level of Economic Development.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Gadi Dung Paul. 2014. \u201cComparative Analysis of Rural and Urban Start-Up Entrepreneurs in Nigeria\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - C: Sociology & Culture GJHSS-C Volume 14 (GJHSS Volume 14 Issue C1): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 14 Issue C1
Pg. 29- 38
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

April 19, 2014

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4898
Total Downloads: 2426
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The goal of this paper is to understand the different factors of the rate of entrepreneurial intentions in rural and urban settings. Using data from survey we test for factors that are expected to affect entrepreneurial between rural and urban areas. We assume one hypothesis; the main difference of rural and urban entrepreneurs is the different resources in two areas. The resources used in this study are individual resources and contextual resources individual resources are composed of self-efficacy and demographic characteristics, contextual resources consist of social support and economic resources. Using these independent factors, we conducted T-tests to compare different resources in rural and urban areas. The results of the analysis suggest that the difference in available individual, economic and social support resources does not explain the observed difference in entrepreneurship rate. The results also indicate that gender, ethnicity, income, and number of children in the family have different effects on entrepreneurial intentions in rural and urban settings. The results suggest that policy makers need to account for cultural or geographical differences when designing entrepreneurial educational and support programs in order to enhance the establishment of new business between rural and urban areas.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Comparative Analysis of Rural and Urban Start-Up Entrepreneurs in Nigeria

Paul D. Gadi
Paul D. Gadi
Datong Cletus Danladi
Datong Cletus Danladi
Esther Bagobiri
Esther Bagobiri

Research Journals