COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THRESHOLD ACCEPTANCE ALGORITHM, SIMULATED ANNEALING ALGORITHM AND GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR FUNCTION OPTIMIZATION

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THRESHOLD ACCEPTANCE ALGORITHM, SIMULATED ANNEALING ALGORITHM AND GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR FUNCTION OPTIMIZATION

Dr. Tejas P Patalia

Contact

Dr. G.R. Kulkarni

Contact

α Singhania University

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THRESHOLD ACCEPTANCE ALGORITHM, SIMULATED ANNEALING ALGORITHM AND GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR FUNCTION OPTIMIZATION

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

5I9MQ

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THRESHOLD ACCEPTANCE ALGORITHM, SIMULATED ANNEALING ALGORITHM AND GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR FUNCTION OPTIMIZATION Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The goal of this study of threshold acceptance algorithm (TA), simulated annealing algorithm (SA) and genetic algorithm (GA) is to determine strength of Genetic Algorithm over other algorithm. It gives a clear idea of how genetic algorithm works. It gives the idea of various sub methods used in genetic algorithm to improve the results and outcome. Basically genetic algorithm and all traditional heuristic methods are used for optimization. Optimization problems are class NP complete problems. Genetic algorithm can be viewed as an optimization technique which exploits random search within a defined search space to solve a problem by some intelligence ideas of nature. In this work we have done Comparative analysis of Threshold Acceptance Algorithm, Simulated Annealing Algorithm and Genetic Algorithm by considering different test functions and its constraints to minimize the test functions.

References

12 Cites in Article

Reference Format

D E Goldberg (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning.
M Bramlette Initialization, mutation and selection methods in genetic algorithm for function optimization.
Morgan Kaufman (1991). Unknown Title.
L Davis Adapting operator probabilities in genetic algorithms.
Morgan Kaufmann (1989). The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies.
K De,Jong,W Spears (1991). An analysis of interacting roles of population size and crossover in genetic algorithms.
K De,Jong,J Sharma Generation gaps revisited.
Morgan Kaufmann (1992). Unknown Title.
K De,Jong,W Spears (1992). A formal analysis of the role of multi-point crossover in genetic algorithms.
David Fogel (1995). Evolutionary Computation.
D Goldberg,J Richardson (1987). Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization.
M Of Mr,Ghambhava (2002). Pefanis, Julian 88 Smith, Graham 10 Pétillon, Pierre-Yves 32, 34, 36 Starobinski, Jean 80 Picard, Raymond 23 Steiner, George 78 Piemme, Jean-Marie 45 Stock, Brian 34 Poe, Edgar Alan 9, 27 Stourdzé, Yves 45–6 Pompidou, Georges 47 Pontaut, Alain 5 Poole, Roger 40–1 Takemura, Kenichi 1, 16 Pound, Ezra 56 Tassart, Maurice 105 Texier, Jean 38 Theall, Donald 12, 68, 81, 107–8 Reagan, Ronald 79, 116 Thenot, Jean-Paul 74 Resnais, Alain 87 Thibau, Jacques 46 Rickels, Lawrence 53 Todorov, Tzvetan 50 Riesman, Paul 18–19, 22 Torgovnic, M. 106, 108 Rigby, Brian 6, 17, 33, 60 Trudeau, Pierre 5, 46–7, 91, Robbe-Grillet, Alain 87 103–4 Robert, Gilles 118 Rokeby, David 10 Rosenthal, Raymond 2 Vermillac, Michel 25, 27 Vernay, Alain 50 Virilio, Paul 4, 16, 89, 95–7 Said, Edward 22 Sarick, Lila 14 Sarrazin, Jean 105 Watson, Wilfred 119–20 Sartre, Jean-Paul 26 Weinstein, M. A. 12 de Saussure, Ferdinand 80, 90 Weiss, Peter 83 Schaeffer, Pierre 56–8, 60 Williams, Raymond 34 Schafer, R. Murray 83 Wolf, Gary 13 Schwartz, Eugene 15 Wolfe, Tom 104 Sevette, Christian 11 Wolton, Dominique 47 Smart, Barry 94 Zingrone, Frank 9 ŽiŽek, Slavoj 59, 62.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Tejas P Patalia. 2012. \u201cCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THRESHOLD ACCEPTANCE ALGORITHM, SIMULATED ANNEALING ALGORITHM AND GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR FUNCTION OPTIMIZATION\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - I: Numerical Methods GJRE-I Volume 12 (GJRE Volume 12 Issue I1): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 12 Issue I1
Pg. 23- 27

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Chromosomes function optimization Genetic Algorithm Heuristic methods Mutation simulated annealing algorithm threshold acceptance algorithm

Submission ReceivedDecember 16, 2011
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2012
Published January 15, 2012

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 14, 2012

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 112

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - I: Numerical Methods

Authors: Dr. Tejas P Patalia, Dr. G.R. Kulkarni (PhD/Dr. count: 2)

View Count (all-time): 261

Total Views (Real + Logic): 5294

Total Downloads (simulated): 2686

Publish Date: 2012 03, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 19 views
Month 2: 24 views
Month 3: 34 views
Month 4: 57 views
Month 5: 24 views
Month 6: 52 views
Month 7: 24 views
Month 8: 47 views
Month 9: 31 views
Month 10: 42 views
Month 11: 27 views
Month 12: 22 views
Month 13: 29 views
Month 14: 26 views
Month 15: 31 views
Month 16: 29 views
Month 17: 20 views
Month 18: 33 views
Month 19: 35 views
Month 20: 36 views
Month 21: 22 views
Month 22: 31 views
Month 23: 35 views
Month 24: 15 views
Month 25: 31 views
Month 26: 26 views
Month 27: 25 views
Month 28: 26 views
Month 29: 31 views
Month 30: 18 views
Month 31: 32 views
Month 32: 19 views
Month 33: 35 views
Month 34: 34 views
Month 35: 12 views
Month 36: 19 views
Month 37: 31 views
Month 38: 27 views
Month 39: 19 views
Month 40: 20 views
Month 41: 17 views
Month 42: 36 views
Month 43: 30 views
Month 44: 45 views
Month 45: 32 views
Month 46: 23 views
Month 47: 22 views
Month 48: 17 views
Month 49: 28 views
Month 50: 33 views
Month 51: 43 views
Month 52: 45 views
Month 53: 41 views
Month 54: 18 views
Month 55: 24 views
Month 56: 12 views
Month 57: 24 views
Month 58: 21 views
Month 59: 25 views
Month 60: 39 views
Month 61: 36 views
Month 62: 38 views
Month 63: 38 views
Month 64: 31 views
Month 65: 12 views
Month 66: 21 views
Month 67: 42 views
Month 68: 19 views
Month 69: 33 views
Month 70: 28 views
Month 71: 26 views
Month 72: 11 views
Month 73: 27 views
Month 74: 42 views
Month 75: 35 views
Month 76: 18 views
Month 77: 34 views
Month 78: 31 views
Month 79: 25 views
Month 80: 30 views
Month 81: 30 views
Month 82: 43 views
Month 83: 42 views
Month 84: 49 views
Month 85: 22 views
Month 86: 29 views
Month 87: 37 views
Month 88: 20 views
Month 89: 31 views
Month 90: 37 views
Month 91: 26 views
Month 92: 21 views
Month 93: 30 views
Month 94: 23 views
Month 95: 44 views
Month 96: 37 views
Month 97: 25 views
Month 98: 12 views
Month 99: 35 views
Month 100: 25 views
Month 101: 50 views
Month 102: 22 views
Month 103: 32 views
Month 104: 30 views
Month 105: 16 views
Month 106: 43 views
Month 107: 20 views
Month 108: 34 views
Month 109: 32 views
Month 110: 26 views
Month 111: 31 views
Month 112: 25 views
Month 113: 25 views
Month 114: 36 views
Month 115: 28 views
Month 116: 38 views
Month 117: 28 views
Month 118: 37 views
Month 119: 43 views
Month 120: 24 views
Month 121: 32 views
Month 122: 23 views
Month 123: 28 views
Month 124: 24 views
Month 125: 37 views
Month 126: 17 views
Month 127: 19 views
Month 128: 30 views
Month 129: 20 views
Month 130: 32 views
Month 131: 23 views
Month 132: 30 views
Month 133: 20 views
Month 134: 36 views
Month 135: 14 views
Month 136: 13 views
Month 137: 30 views
Month 138: 39 views
Month 139: 40 views
Month 140: 30 views
Month 141: 30 views
Month 142: 21 views
Month 143: 38 views
Month 144: 37 views
Month 145: 33 views
Month 146: 12 views
Month 147: 37 views
Month 148: 20 views
Month 149: 38 views
Month 150: 32 views
Month 151: 43 views
Month 152: 41 views
Month 153: 39 views
Month 154: 23 views
Month 155: 23 views
Month 156: 40 views
Month 157: 44 views
Month 158: 31 views
Month 159: 36 views
Month 160: 42 views
Month 161: 37 views
Month 162: 40 views
Month 163: 38 views
Month 164: 38 views
Month 165: 42 views
Month 166: 17 views
Month 167: 19 views
Month 168: 30 views
Month 169: 55 views
Month 170: 52 views

Total Views: 5294

Total Downloads: 2686

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]