Comparative Efficacy, Safety and Cost Analysis of Amisulpride vs Olanzapine for Treatment of Schizophrenia

Comparative Efficacy, Safety and Cost Analysis of Amisulpride vs Olanzapine for Treatment of Schizophrenia

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MR86GK1

Comparative Efficacy, Safety and Cost Analysis of Amisulpride vs Olanzapine for Treatment of Schizophrenia Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a psychiatric disorder associated with a range of psychological, behavioural and cognitive problems especially. Nowadays, atypical antipsychotics are the mainstay for the treatment of shizophrenia. Among them amisulpride and olanzapine are the most commonly used atypical antipsychotics. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and cost analysis of amisulpride vs olanzapine for the treatment of schizophrenia. It is a double blind, randomised control clinical trial conducted over a period of 12 weeks. A total of 90 patients were included which were randomly divided into two groups. Group A consisting of 39 patients who received amisulpride tablet( 400mg/day) and group B consisting of 38 patients received olanzapine tablet (10mg/day). The brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) was taken as main evaluation parameter for the effectiveness of treatment.

I. INTRODUCTION

Schizophrenia is a chronic psychiatric disease characterised by variety of symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, altered speech, cognitive decline and impairment in perception of reality. It is a chronic disease but with early onset which significantly decreases the quality of life and productivity of patients. Prevalence of shizophrenia worldwide is approximately 24 million people and in India it affects more than 3 million people. The prognosis of disease is generally not good. Typical and atypical antipsychotics are used for the treatment of disease. Typical antipsychotics have low efficacy for treatment of symptoms and also have a lot of adverse effect therefore, atypical antipsychotics are preferred nowadays over typical antispycotics. Amisulpride and olanzapine are among the most commonly used antipsycotics[^3]. Amisulpride is a relatively new drug in India as compared to olanzapine.

Both drugs works by blocking different group of receptors. Amisulpride has affinity for D2 and D3 dopamine receptors[^4] which helps in relief of both positive and negative symptoms with less extrapyramidal symptoms whereas olanzapine has affinity for 5HT2 and D2 dopamine receptors[^5] which helps in improving psychotic symptoms.

We have conducted a 12 week double blind, randomised clinical trial to compare the efficacy[^6], safety and cost of the amisulpride and olanzapine for treatment of schizophrenia. As cost of treatment is an important factor in india, we have done the cost analysis of both the treatments to help determine the treatment of choice for patients of schizophrenia.

II. METHODOLOGY

This was a double blind randomised clinical trial conducted in the medicine department of pacific medical college and hospital. The study was conducted according to good clinical practice guidelines (ICMR) 7 . The informed consent was taken from each patient. Patient inclusion criteria includes all diagnosed cases of schizophrenia according to ICD - 10 8 guidelines between age of 18 to 60 years. Exclusion criteria includes all pregnant and lactating women and patients with any co-morbidity. A total of 90 patients of schizophrenia were included in the study. These patients were randomly divided into 2 groups - group A (39 patients) and group B (38 patients). Group A patients received tablet amisulpride 400 mg / day whereas group B patients received tablet olanzapine 10 mg/day for 12 weeks. Follow up visits were done at the end of 4th, 8th and 12th weeks. The efficacy of the drug was assessed using the change in the value of BPRS 9 score from the baseline. The safety profile of both the drugs was assessed by reporting any adverse event, involuntary movement, change in behaviour or weight gain. The cost of the treatment was calculated by adding the cost of medication given per day for 12 weeks. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. For comparison of means in two groups we used unpaired student t test and for comparison of mean in a single group we used paired student t test. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for comparison of means of different parameters. P-value was obtained to determine the statistical significance. P - value < 0.05 was taken as significant.

III. RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were included in the study (45 in each group) with baseline parameters as shown in table 1. Out of these 90 patients only 77 (39 in group A and 38 in group B) completed the study (table 2). 3 patients in group A and 2 patients in group B left the study due to unknown reason. 2 patients in group A and 3 patients in group B left the study due to lack of efficacy of treatment and 1 patient in each group left study due to some other reason. 1 patient died in group B during the course of study.

Table 2395: Table 1: Baseline parameters
Group AGroup B
Age (mean)32 years.33 years
Gender (Male/female)20/1920/18
Duration of disease11.0 years10.5 years
Weight (mean)53.5 kg52.9 kg
Mean BPRS score56.5.57.5.
Table 2394: Table 2: Study follow up
Group AGroup B
Total patients randomised4545
Patients Completed study3938
Patients left study67
Left due to unknown reason32
Left due to lack of efficacy23
Death01
Others11

During the study the BPRS score was collected at the end of 4th, 8th and 12th week (table 3). The mean change in BPRS score in group A was 16.80 and in group B was 15.5. The efficacy of both the drugs was comparable and the difference is not statistically significant.

Table 2393: Table 3: The BPRS score BPRS score Group A Group B Baseline bprs score 56.5 57.5 4th week bprs score 48.1 50.3 8th week bprs score 40.1 42.2 12th week bprs score 33.9 35.4
BPRS scoreGroup AGroup B
Baseline bprs score56.557.5
4th week bprs score48.150.3
8th week bprs score40.142.2
12th week bprs score33.935.4

No major adverse effect was seen and only minor adverse effects was see in both line of drugs. Both drugs are comparable in terms of safety profile except that their is significant weight gain seen in olanzapine group. Amisulpride treatment can cost upto 3000 to 3500 INR whereas olanzapine treatment can cost between 800 to 900 INR for 12 weeks of treatment per patient. Amisulpride treatment is more expensive than olanzapine treatment.

IV. DISCUSSION

Most of the studies for the use of both these drugs in schizophrenia patients are conducted on western population. Still very few studies are done for the use of these drugs on Indian population therefore we have done a study which is primarily focused on Indian population[^10]. We have compared efficacy, safety and cost of amisulpride and olanzapine for treatment of schizophrenia. Both these drugs are comparable in terms of efficacy. We used BPRS score as the main evaluation parameters for efficacy. Both these drugs also shows an equal improvement in symptoms of disease however both the drugs are helpful in improving positive symptoms more than the negative symptoms. Amisulpride is also helpful in improving the cognitive functions of the brain. No major adverse was seen with both drugs during the Course of treatment except weight gain which is a typical feature of all antipsychotics. However olanzapine group showed much more weight gain than amisulpride group. Difference in weight gain is due to the different receptors that both drugs target. Amisulpride has selective affinity for D2 and D3 dopaminergic receptors on the other hand olanzapine also has affinity for 5HT2 receptors. These drugs can increase the risk of hypertension, diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular disease in later part of life therefore olanzapine should be given carefully in patients having any kind of co-morbidity or obesity. In terms of cost amisulpride is more expensive than olanzapine treatment. Till now most of the studies are conducted in western counties whereas for poor parents in India cost of the treatment and affordability is a major issue. Therefore while deciding the deciding the treatment of choice for schizophrenia patients in India cost of the treatment should also be. Considered along with efficacy and safety of drug. This study will help in deciding the treatment of choice for schizophrenia patients in Indian population. In general Olanzapine can be given to patients who do not have any kind of comorbid condition whereas amisulpride should be preferred in patients who can afford the treatment or having any kind of co-morbid condition.

V. CONCLUSION

Both Amisulpride and olanzapine are comparable in terms of efficacy and safety profile except that there is significant weight gain seen with olanzapine. To conclude, olanzapine can be used in the patients who are not having any co-morbid condition whereas amisulpride should be preferred in patients who can afford it or having any kind of co-morbid condition for treatment of shizophrenia in indian population.

References

11 Cites in Article
  1. 1. Robert Mccutcheon,Tiago Reis Marques,Oliver Howes (2020). Schizophrenia—An Overview. JAMA Psychiatry, 77(2), 201.
  2. 2. Assen Jablensky (2000). Epidemiology of schizophrenia: the global burden of disease and disability. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 250(6), 274-285.
  3. 3. Ganesh Pawar,P Phadnis,A Paliwal (2012). Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, and Cognitive Profile of Amisulpride Per Se and Its Comparison with Olanzapine in Newly Diagnosed Schizophrenic Patients in an 8-Week, Double-Blind, Single-Centre, Prospective Clinical Trial. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 1-5.
  4. 4. Kate Mckeage,Greg Plosker (2004). Amisulpride. CNS Drugs, 18(13), 933-956.
  5. 5. Shitij Kapur,Robert Zipursky,Gary Remington,Corey Jones,Jean Dasilva,Alan Wilson,Sylvain Houle (1998). 5-HT<sub>2</sub>and D<sub>2</sub>Receptor Occupancy of Olanzapine in Schizophrenia: A PET Investigation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(7), 921-928.
  6. 6. Ali Yashin,Dolly Roy,Prosenjit Ghosh (2019). A comparative study of the efficacy of amisulpride and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia attending the outpatient Department of Psychiatry in a tertiary care hospital, Silchar, Assam, India. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 8(2), 284.
  7. 7. Icmr good clinical practises guidelines. Icmr good clinical practises guidelines
  8. 8. William Whitfield (1992). Book Reviews : The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines by World Health Organization. Published by WHO, 1992, 362pp, paperback. ISBN: 92-4-154422-8. Journal of the Royal Society of Health, 113(2), 103-103.
  9. 9. (7Xrd). Unknown Title. UwtLN5y&sig=DlI6Foq2RxQ
  10. 10. D Lachar,S Bailley,H Rhoades,R Varner (1999). Use of BPRS-A percent change scores to identify significant clinical improvement: accuracy of treatment response classification in acute psychiatric inpatients. Psychiatry Research, 89(3), 259-268.
  11. 11. Subhrojyoti Bhowmick,Avijit Hazra,Malati Ghosh (2010). Amisulpride Versus Olanzapine in the Treatment of Schizophrenia in Indian Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44(3), 237-242.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Harsh Bansal, Nishita Gandhi, Vidhu Arora, Shahpoor Shirzada, Sinchana S Kadur, Donald D Savariah. 2026. "Comparative Efficacy, Safety and Cost Analysis of Amisulpride vs Olanzapine for Treatment of Schizophrenia". Global Journal of Medical Research - B: Pharma, Drug Discovery, Toxicology & Medicine GJMR-B Volume 23 (GJMR Volume 23 Issue B3).

Download Citation

Enhanced alt text for clarity on comparative drug efficacy and safety.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmr

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords
Classification
GJMR-B Classification NLM Code: WM 203
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
January 2, 2024

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 371
Total Downloads: 32
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Comparative Efficacy, Safety and Cost Analysis of Amisulpride vs Olanzapine for Treatment of Schizophrenia

Harsh Bansal
Harsh Bansal pacific medical college and hospital
Nishita Gandhi
Nishita Gandhi
Vidhu Arora
Vidhu Arora
Shahpoor Shirzada
Shahpoor Shirzada
Sinchana Kadur
Sinchana Kadur
Donald Savariah
Donald Savariah