Comparative Study of Generic Structural Elements in Research Article Abstracts of Selected Arts-Based Disciplines

Comparative Study of Generic Structural Elements in Research Article Abstracts of Selected Arts-Based Disciplines

Kazeem K. Olaniyan

Contact

Ladoke Akintola University of Technology

Comparative Study of Generic Structural Elements in Research Article Abstracts of Selected Arts-Based Disciplines

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

NM75P

Comparative Study of Generic Structural Elements in Research Article Abstracts of Selected Arts-Based Disciplines Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Academic genre analysts have over the last few decades preoccupied themselves with the description of rhetorical organisation of different academic genres. This is done with a view to providing writers (most especially young entrants into academic discourse community) with knowledge on academic genre literacy. Extant literature reveals that generic structural elements of arts-based research article abstracts have not been much explored using generic comparative analytical approach/perspective and this creates a research vacuum in the literature. This study therefore fills the vacuum as it carries out a comparative study of Generic Structural Elements in Research Article Abstracts of Selected Arts-Based Disciplines. This is done with a view to determining the generic structural variations across disciplines. The study utilised as data three hundred abstracts, 100 from each group, purposively selected from 27 journals in Languages and Communication (LC), 13 in Literary and Creative Arts (LCA) and 25 in Cultural Studies and Philosophy (CSP) published between 2001 and 2010. The journals selected are domiciled in universities in the inner circle (countries where English is spoken as mother tongue). The generic structural elements of these abstracts are comparatively analysed using insights from the Generic Structural Potential analytical tool of SFG.

References

51 Cites in Article

Reference Format

W Adegbite (2000). Pragmatics: some basic principles and procedures.
Hasan Ansary,Esmat Babaii (2004). The Generic Integrity of Newspaper Editorials.
M Berry (1977). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics.
Ruth Breeze (2009). Issues of persuasion in academic law abstracts.
Charles Bazerman (1984). The Writing of Scientific Non-Fiction:.
V Bhatia (1993). Analysing genre: language use in professional settings.
U Belloti (2008). Research Article Abstracts as Domain-specific Epistemological Indicators: A Corpus-based Study: Michele Sala.
A Cava (2010). Evaluative lexis in science: A corpus-based study in scientific abstracts.
A Chalak,Z Norouzi (2013). Rhetorical Moves and Verb Tense in Abstracts: A Comparative Analysis of American and Iranian Academic Writing.
Dos Santos,M (1996). The Textual Organisation of Research Paper Abstracts in Applied Linguistics.
Tony Dudley-Evans,Willie Henderson (1993). The Development of the Economics Article: 1891 to 1980.
M Durrentl (2009). 2009 Miracle Yearbook.
S Eggins (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics.
V Feltrim,S Aluisio,M Nunes (2003). Analysis of the Rhetorical Structure of Computer Science Abstracts in Portuguese.
J Firth (1962). PART IV. THE STATISTICAL THEORY OF LINGUISTIC CODING-INFORMATION THEORY.
N Graetz (1985). Extract from SPX 373.
P Gillaerts,F Vande Velde (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts.
M Halliday (1978). Language as a social semantic: The social interpretation of language and meaning.
M Halliday (1985). An introduction to functional grammar London.
R Hasan (1978). Text in the Systemic -functional Model.
R Hasan (1984). The Structure of the Nursery Tale: An Essay in Text Typology.
R Hasan (1996). Ways of saying: ways of meaning.
M Halliday,R Hasan (1985). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semantic Perspectives.
M Halliday,R Hasan (1991). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a socialsemantic perspective.
S Hyons (1996). Genre in Three Traditions: Implications for ESL.
Ken Hyland (2000). Disciplinary Discourses, Michigan Classics Ed..
S Hunston (1993). Evaluation and Ideology in Scientific Writing.
Budsaba Kanoksilapatham (2007). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles.
L San,H Tan (2012). A Comparative Study of the Rhetorical Moves in Abstracts of Published Research Articles and Students' Term Papers in the Field of Computer and Communication Systems Engineering.
Jason Miin-Hwa Lim (2010). Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation.
K Locke,K Golden-Biddle (1997). CONSTRUCTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONTRIBUTION: STRUCTURING INTERTEXTUAL COHERENCE AND "PROBLEMATIZING" IN ORGANIZATIONAL STUDIES..
R Lorés (2004). On RA Abstracts: From Rhetorical Structure to Thematic Organisation.
B Malinowski (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages" supplement 1 to.
H Marefat,Mohammadzadeh,Sh (2013). Genre analysis of literature research article abstracts: A cross-linguistic, cross-cultural study.
J Martin (1985). Systemic Background (1985) First published in Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. 1: Selected Theoretical Papers from the Ninth International Systemic Workshop, edited by James D. Benson and William S. Greaves (Advances in Discourse Processes 15). Ablex Publishing, 1985, pp. 1–15..
J Martin (1992). English Text.
J Martin (1993). A Contextual Theory of Language.
P Martin-Martin (2002). A Genre-based investigation of abstract writing in English and Spanish.
P Martin-Martin,S Burgess (2004). The rhetorical management of academic criticism in research article abstracts.
Mark Napper,Stephen Gill,Peter Schoch,Stephen Lane,Richard Angliss,Richard Page (1987). A Physiotherapist-Led Paediatric Fracture Clinic was a Safe and Efficient Alternative to Traditional Outpatient Orthopaedic Care: A Preliminary Evaluation.
C Miller (1984). Genre as social action.
D Motta-Roth (1999). Text and genre literacy in the classroom XIV Encontro National de Professores Universitaries de Lingua Inglesa.
Leila Noorizadeh-Honami,Azizeh Chalak (2018). Comparative Analysis of Architecture Research Article Abstracts Written by Native and Non-native Authors: A Cross-linguistic, Cross-cultural Study.
P Pho (2008). Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics and Educational Technology: A Study of Linguistic Realizations of Rhetorical Structure and Authorial Stance.
B Samraj (2002). Introductions in Research Articles: Variations across Disciplines.
Supachai Saeeaw,Supong Tangkiengsirisin (2014). Rhetorical Variation across Research Article Abstracts in Environmental Science and Applied Linguistics.
Betty Samraj (2004). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines.
John Swales (1990). 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, selected 45–47, 52–60.
J Swales,C Feak (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: A course for non-native speakers of English.
F Talakoob,S Shafiee (2016). A Comparative Study of Abstracts Written by Male and Female Native vs. Nonnative Researchers: Length and Organization in Focus.
M Ulker (2012). A Comparative Analysis of Thesis Guidelines and Master Thesis Abstracts Written in English at universities in Turkey and in the USA: Being a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Kazeem K. Olaniyan. 2021. \u201cComparative Study of Generic Structural Elements in Research Article Abstracts of Selected Arts-Based Disciplines\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 21 (GJHSS Volume 21 Issue A11): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJHSS Volume 21 Issue A11
Pg. 39- 46

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJHSS-A Classification: FOR Code: 190499

Submission ReceivedSeptember 13, 2021
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted October 3, 2021
Published October 15, 2021

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 15, 2021

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 2120

Total Downloads: 985

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]