Comparative Study on the Breeding Performance of Two Different Strains (XY Male and YY Male) of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Comparative Study on the Breeding Performance of Two Different Strains (XY Male and YY Male) of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Priyanka Rani Majumdar

Contact

Amitav Roy

Contact

Abdullah-Al Mamun

Contact

Shuva Bhowmik

Contact

Md. Tamim Hasan

Contact

Noakhali Science and Technology University

Comparative Study on the Breeding Performance of Two Different Strains (XY Male and YY Male) of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

4A08P

Comparative Study on the Breeding Performance of Two Different Strains (XY Male and YY Male) of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The study was conducted to know the breeding performance of two strains (YY and XY male tilapia) of in Bismillah Agro production hatchery of Noakhali Sadar in Noakhali district, Bangladesh from May to August, 2012.The length, weight of the brood fishes and gonad weight, fecundity, egg fertilization rate, hatching rate, fry survival rate and larval growth in both strains were assessed. YY male showed the highest length and weight during three stocking months. Average fertilization rate and hatching rate were higher in YY male derived than that of XY male derived egg. Higher average larval survival rate and larval growth was observed in YY male derived progeny than that of XY male derived. Production of male population was higher in YY male than XY male tilapia. The result of the present study concluded that YY male tilapia outperformed than XY male in all cases of breeding performance.

References

16 Cites in Article

Reference Format

O Adebayo (2006). Reproductive performance of African Clariid Catfish Clariasgariepinus broodstock on varying maternal stress.
M Authman,M El-Kasheif,K Shallof (2009). Evaluation and management of the fisheries of Tilapia species in Damietta branch of the River Nile, Egypt.
Gladys Bwanika,Debra Murie,Lauren Chapman (2007). Comparative age and growth of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) in lakes Nabugabo and Wamala, Uganda.
S Chakraborty,D Mazumdar,U Chatterji,S Banerjee (2011). Growth of Mixed-Sex and Monosex Nile Tilapia in Different Culture Systems.
M Dey (2000). The impact of genetically improved farmed Nile tilapia in Asia.
S Edwin,P Ronald (1998). Reproductive Efficiency of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and "Red" Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) and Comparative Growth and Efficacy of Sex Reversal of Nile Tilapia and "Red" Tilapia.
N Khan,M Ashraf,M Mughal,N Qureshi,M Khan,F Rasool,M Rehman,M Nasir,W Ali,K Iqbal (2014). Survival and growth potential of Genetically Male Tilapia (GMT) fry in flow through system under different dietary protein concentrations.
Christian Lèveque (2002). Out of Africa: The Success Story of Tilapias.
Yu-Hung Lin,Shih-Mei Lin,Shi-Yen Shiau (2008). Dietary manganese requirements of juvenile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus × O. aureus.
Graham Mair,Jose Abucay,John Beardmore,David Skibinski (1997). Growth performance trials of genetically male tilapia (GMT) derived from YY-males in Oreochromis niloticus L.: On station comparisons with mixed sex and sex reversed male populations.
S Mandal,M Hasan,M Rahman,M Manik,Z Mahmud,M Islam (2009). FISH WASTE AND SHRIMP HEAD SILAGE AS DIETARY ROTEIN SOURCES FOR NILE TILAPIA, Oreochromis niloticus.
S Palipoch,W Jiraungkoorskul,T Tansatit,N Preyavichyapugdee,W Jaikua,P Kosai (2011). Effect of Thunbergialaurifolia(Linn) leaf extract dietary supplement against lead toxicity in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).
D Penman,B Mcandrew (2000). Genetics for the management and improvement of cultured tilapias.
Mohammad Ridha (2006). Comparative study of growth performance of three strains of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, L. at two stocking densities.
M Shamsuddin,M Hossain,M Rahman,M Asadujjaman,M Ali (2012). Performance of Monosex Fry Production of Two Nile Tilapia Strains: GIFT and NEW GIPU.
R Velasco (2003). Reproductive biology of tilapias. In: Training manual on broodstock management and sex reversal of tilapia using GIFT protocol.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Priyanka Rani Majumdar. 2015. \u201cComparative Study on the Breeding Performance of Two Different Strains (XY Male and YY Male) of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 14 (GJSFR Volume 14 Issue D10).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJSFR Volume 14 Issue D10

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords

breeding performance oreochromisniloticus xy male yy male

Submission ReceivedNovember 29, 2014
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 20, 2014
Published December 30, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 14, 2015

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 105

Country: Bangladesh

Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary

Authors: Amitav Roy, Abdullah-Al Mamun, Shuva Bhowmik, Md. Tamim Hasan, Priyanka Rani Majumdar (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 180

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4513

Total Downloads (simulated): 2254

Publish Date: 2015 01, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 25 views
Month 2: 30 views
Month 3: 42 views
Month 4: 40 views
Month 5: 46 views
Month 6: 44 views
Month 7: 35 views
Month 8: 38 views
Month 9: 21 views
Month 10: 50 views
Month 11: 29 views
Month 12: 11 views
Month 13: 37 views
Month 14: 39 views
Month 15: 24 views
Month 16: 28 views
Month 17: 42 views
Month 18: 29 views
Month 19: 24 views
Month 20: 20 views
Month 21: 47 views
Month 22: 42 views
Month 23: 26 views
Month 24: 43 views
Month 25: 42 views
Month 26: 24 views
Month 27: 19 views
Month 28: 32 views
Month 29: 42 views
Month 30: 40 views
Month 31: 39 views
Month 32: 31 views
Month 33: 22 views
Month 34: 41 views
Month 35: 26 views
Month 36: 28 views
Month 37: 41 views
Month 38: 27 views
Month 39: 24 views
Month 40: 35 views
Month 41: 43 views
Month 42: 22 views
Month 43: 39 views
Month 44: 21 views
Month 45: 45 views
Month 46: 11 views
Month 47: 35 views
Month 48: 31 views
Month 49: 44 views
Month 50: 26 views
Month 51: 37 views
Month 52: 17 views
Month 53: 37 views
Month 54: 32 views
Month 55: 29 views
Month 56: 35 views
Month 57: 23 views
Month 58: 50 views
Month 59: 46 views
Month 60: 41 views
Month 61: 36 views
Month 62: 36 views
Month 63: 13 views
Month 64: 30 views
Month 65: 39 views
Month 66: 21 views
Month 67: 21 views
Month 68: 26 views
Month 69: 45 views
Month 70: 31 views
Month 71: 48 views
Month 72: 42 views
Month 73: 19 views
Month 74: 28 views
Month 75: 24 views
Month 76: 34 views
Month 77: 33 views
Month 78: 45 views
Month 79: 20 views
Month 80: 34 views
Month 81: 23 views
Month 82: 25 views
Month 83: 44 views
Month 84: 27 views
Month 85: 39 views
Month 86: 24 views
Month 87: 14 views
Month 88: 34 views
Month 89: 16 views
Month 90: 46 views
Month 91: 29 views
Month 92: 40 views
Month 93: 30 views
Month 94: 41 views
Month 95: 21 views
Month 96: 17 views
Month 97: 36 views
Month 98: 43 views
Month 99: 14 views
Month 100: 32 views
Month 101: 43 views
Month 102: 47 views
Month 103: 23 views
Month 104: 26 views
Month 105: 32 views
Month 106: 37 views
Month 107: 39 views
Month 108: 16 views
Month 109: 15 views
Month 110: 41 views
Month 111: 29 views
Month 112: 34 views
Month 113: 31 views
Month 114: 38 views
Month 115: 34 views
Month 116: 18 views
Month 117: 28 views
Month 118: 45 views
Month 119: 24 views
Month 120: 35 views
Month 121: 34 views
Month 122: 16 views
Month 123: 13 views
Month 124: 41 views
Month 125: 31 views
Month 126: 36 views
Month 127: 20 views
Month 128: 36 views
Month 129: 26 views
Month 130: 39 views
Month 131: 34 views
Month 132: 28 views
Month 133: 73 views
Month 134: 43 views
Month 135: 48 views
Month 136: 36 views

Total Views: 4513

Total Downloads: 2254

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]