Comparison of Capability Analysis of Cumulative Cardiac Thoracic Ratio (CTR) Outputs

Comparison of Capability Analysis of Cumulative Cardiac Thoracic Ratio (CTR) Outputs

Shaib, I.O

Contact

Adekeye

Contact

K.S.

Contact

Shaib

Contact

I.O

Contact

Redeemer's University

Comparison of Capability Analysis of Cumulative Cardiac Thoracic Ratio (CTR) Outputs

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

Q80X6

Comparison of Capability Analysis of Cumulative Cardiac Thoracic Ratio (CTR) Outputs Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This study investigated the Capability Process Analysis of cumulative Cardiac Thoracic Ratio (CTR) during Radiological Chest Examination using MX.4 Radiological Diagnostic Machine (DRM) at the Fate Medical Foundation Radiological Department, Auchi. The data for the study are classified as raw and simulated CTR values. Statistical process control was investigated to address process stability and capability analysis was performed for the two processes. The pattern of the means of the raw and simulated values was investigated using normal probability plots and empirical CDF functions. The raw computed CTR values and simulated CTR values confirmed that the system is operating under 1.0 -1.3 sigma level for the raw CTR values. Around 28-39% of the raw CTR values obtained fall outside the specification limits. In addition, for all the cumulative raw CTR values suggested that the process is off centered and is towards the lower specification limit. Further study should be conducted on large repeated experimental CTR sample to ascertain the reliability of this study. Fellow up study of patients should be undertaken by the cardiologist to reduce the possible health risk associated with high CTR.

References

32 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Wagner Borges,Linda Ho (2001). A fraction defective based capability index.
R Boyles (1994). Process capability with asymmetric tolerances.
R Boyles (1991). Taguchi capability index.
W Carr (1991). A new Process capability index: parts per million.
P Castagliola (1996). Evaluation of non-normal process capability indices using Burr's Distribution.
B Choi,D Owen (1990). A study of a new process capability index.
Y Chou,A Polansky (1996). Fitting SPC data using a sample quantile ratio.
Youn-Min Chou,Alan Polansky,Robert Mason (1998). Transforming Non-Normal Data to Normality in Statistical Process Control.
P Ciarlini,A Gigli,G Regoliosi (1999). The computation of accuracy of quality parameters by means of a monte carlo simulation.
M Deleryd,K Vännman (1999). Process capability plots-A quality improvement tool.
A Gomez,A Kwanchai (1984). Lanson, Gustave. Voltaire. New York (605 Third Avenue), 10016: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966. 258 P. $2.95.
S Hubele,K Vännman (2004). The effect of pooled and un-pooled variance estimators on C pm When Using Subsamples.
T Hsiang,G Taguchi (1985). Tutorial on quality control and assurance -The Taguchi Methods.
C James (2001). Design, use and performance of statistical control chart for process Improvement.
J Juran (1974). Juran's Quality Control Handbook.
Frank Kaminsky,Robert Dovich,Richard Burke (1998). PROCESS CAPABILITY INDICES: NOW AND IN THE FUTURE.
Victor Kane (1986). Process Capability Indices.
S Mukherjee (1995). Process capability indices and associated inference problems.
W Pearn,K Chen (1995). Estimating process capability indices for non-normal Pearsonian populations.
W Pearn,Samuel Kotz,Norman Johnson (1992). Distributional and Inferential Properties of Process Capability Indices.
W Pearn,S Kotz (1994). Application of elements' method for calculating second and thirdgeneration process capability indices for non-normal Pearsonian populations.
M Perakis,E Xekalaki (2002). A process capability index that is based on the proportion of conformance.
Michael Perakis,Evdokia Xekalaki (2005). A process capability index for discrete processes.
Alan Polansky,Youn-Min Chou,Robert Mason (1998). ESTIMATING PROCESS CAPABILITY INDICES FOR A TRLTNCATED DISTRIBUTION.
A Polansky,Y Chou,R Mason (1998). Estimating process capability indices for a truncated distribution.
S Ribeiro,M Jose,S Renato,J Roberto,H Francisco,A Domingo,Beatriz (2012). Atualização da Diretriz Brasileira de Insuficiência Cardíaca Crônica - 2012.
P Singha (2002). Introductory to statistical thinking in quality Bio-Statistics.
K Vännman (1995). A unified approach to capability indices.
K Vännman (2001). A graphical method to control process capability.
K Vännman (1997). A general class of capability indices in the case of asymmetric tolerances.
K Vännman (1998). Families of capability indices for one-sided specification limits.
Arthur Yeh,Sumankumar Bhattcharya (1998). A robust process capability index.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Shaib, I.O. 2014. \u201cComparison of Capability Analysis of Cumulative Cardiac Thoracic Ratio (CTR) Outputs\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - I: Numerical Methods GJRE-I Volume 14 (GJRE Volume 14 Issue I1): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 14 Issue I1
Pg. 43- 54

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

4 DRM x-ray Algorithms capability plot CTR heart failure mx

Submission ReceivedDecember 15, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 30, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 104

Country: Nigeria

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - I: Numerical Methods

Authors: Adekeye, K.S., Shaib, I.O (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 221

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4935

Total Downloads (simulated): 2319

Publish Date: 2014 06, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 35 views
Month 2: 32 views
Month 3: 40 views
Month 4: 56 views
Month 5: 24 views
Month 6: 46 views
Month 7: 43 views
Month 8: 37 views
Month 9: 38 views
Month 10: 24 views
Month 11: 31 views
Month 12: 33 views
Month 13: 20 views
Month 14: 43 views
Month 15: 32 views
Month 16: 28 views
Month 17: 20 views
Month 18: 30 views
Month 19: 17 views
Month 20: 33 views
Month 21: 43 views
Month 22: 16 views
Month 23: 40 views
Month 24: 37 views
Month 25: 49 views
Month 26: 44 views
Month 27: 34 views
Month 28: 40 views
Month 29: 21 views
Month 30: 43 views
Month 31: 17 views
Month 32: 48 views
Month 33: 26 views
Month 34: 26 views
Month 35: 43 views
Month 36: 27 views
Month 37: 46 views
Month 38: 28 views
Month 39: 14 views
Month 40: 34 views
Month 41: 38 views
Month 42: 18 views
Month 43: 42 views
Month 44: 15 views
Month 45: 28 views
Month 46: 27 views
Month 47: 16 views
Month 48: 45 views
Month 49: 30 views
Month 50: 42 views
Month 51: 17 views
Month 52: 17 views
Month 53: 26 views
Month 54: 34 views
Month 55: 34 views
Month 56: 35 views
Month 57: 23 views
Month 58: 39 views
Month 59: 46 views
Month 60: 34 views
Month 61: 21 views
Month 62: 36 views
Month 63: 42 views
Month 64: 29 views
Month 65: 41 views
Month 66: 33 views
Month 67: 18 views
Month 68: 46 views
Month 69: 38 views
Month 70: 15 views
Month 71: 30 views
Month 72: 35 views
Month 73: 42 views
Month 74: 28 views
Month 75: 27 views
Month 76: 32 views
Month 77: 32 views
Month 78: 28 views
Month 79: 33 views
Month 80: 35 views
Month 81: 18 views
Month 82: 34 views
Month 83: 40 views
Month 84: 19 views
Month 85: 28 views
Month 86: 37 views
Month 87: 33 views
Month 88: 19 views
Month 89: 33 views
Month 90: 28 views
Month 91: 39 views
Month 92: 39 views
Month 93: 38 views
Month 94: 19 views
Month 95: 28 views
Month 96: 41 views
Month 97: 38 views
Month 98: 33 views
Month 99: 45 views
Month 100: 48 views
Month 101: 19 views
Month 102: 39 views
Month 103: 42 views
Month 104: 35 views
Month 105: 29 views
Month 106: 23 views
Month 107: 32 views
Month 108: 28 views
Month 109: 20 views
Month 110: 42 views
Month 111: 37 views
Month 112: 31 views
Month 113: 27 views
Month 114: 28 views
Month 115: 39 views
Month 116: 33 views
Month 117: 41 views
Month 118: 35 views
Month 119: 42 views
Month 120: 28 views
Month 121: 29 views
Month 122: 49 views
Month 123: 46 views
Month 124: 39 views
Month 125: 38 views
Month 126: 33 views
Month 127: 43 views
Month 128: 41 views
Month 129: 20 views
Month 130: 40 views
Month 131: 39 views
Month 132: 19 views
Month 133: 22 views
Month 134: 39 views
Month 135: 21 views
Month 136: 17 views
Month 137: 30 views
Month 138: 25 views
Month 139: 46 views
Month 140: 25 views
Month 141: 75 views
Month 142: 72 views
Month 143: 69 views

Total Views: 4935

Total Downloads: 2319

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]