Comparison of Isolated Pad Footing and Beam-Slab Isolated Footing based on Varying the Footing size and Grade of Steel

Ishani Singal

Comparison of Isolated Pad Footing and Beam-Slab Isolated Footing based on Varying the Footing size and Grade of Steel

Ishani Singal * §

Contact

§ Manipal Institute of Technology

Comparison of Isolated Pad Footing and Beam-Slab Isolated Footing based on Varying the Footing size and Grade of Steel

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

41197

Comparison of Isolated Pad Footing and Beam-Slab Isolated Footing based on Varying the Footing size and Grade of Steel Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of isolated pad footing with the Beam-Slab Isolated footing. In this paper beams have been introduced in the isolated pad footing to accommodate the tension in the footing. This in return reduces the overall depth of the footing. The design has been carried out to satisfy the Flexural and shear values for the foundation as per IS 456:2000. The diameter of the bar is decided such as to ensure that the area of steel provided is closest to the steel required as per the Limit State Design. Graphs are prepared to analyze the steel and concrete required for varying sizes of the footing (starting from 1m upto 6 m with a 0.5m increment) and comparing the values for 415 and Fe 500 steel values

References

3 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. M. Al-Ansari (2013). Structural Cost of Optimized Reinforced Concrete Isolated Footing. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 290, 290-297.
2. (2000). IS 456:2000 Plain and Reinforced Concrete- Code of Practice (Fourth Revision), tenth reprint, April 2007. Plain and Reinforced Concrete- Code of Practice (Fourth Revision
3. S. Sharma,M. Vanza,D. Mehta (2014). Comparison of Raft foundation and Beam & Slab Raft Foundation for High Rise Building. International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, 571, 571-575.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ishani Singal. 2017. "Comparison of Isolated Pad Footing and Beam-Slab Isolated Footing based on Varying the Footing size and Grade of Steel". Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural GJRE-E Volume 16 (GJRE Volume 16 Issue 28 (E5)).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 16 Issue 28 (E5)

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-E Classification FOR Code: 090502

Submission ReceivedApril 12, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted April 30, 2016
Published December 5, 2016

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 5, 2016

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural

Authors: Ishani Singal (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 466

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1824

Total Downloads (simulated): 146

Publish Date: 2016 11, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 69 views
Month 2: 67 views
Month 3: 47 views
Month 4: 65 views
Month 5: 70 views
Month 6: 59 views
Month 7: 29 views
Month 8: 44 views
Month 9: 42 views
Month 10: 40 views
Month 11: 46 views
Month 12: 35 views
Month 13: 24 views
Month 14: 32 views
Month 15: 31 views
Month 16: 47 views
Month 17: 21 views
Month 18: 36 views
Month 19: 22 views
Month 20: 20 views
Month 21: 28 views
Month 22: 23 views
Month 23: 43 views
Month 24: 32 views
Month 25: 37 views
Month 26: 45 views
Month 27: 45 views
Month 28: 16 views
Month 29: 21 views
Month 30: 21 views
Month 31: 36 views
Month 32: 18 views
Month 33: 31 views
Month 34: 32 views
Month 35: 42 views
Month 36: 39 views
Month 37: 40 views
Month 38: 15 views
Month 39: 10 views
Month 40: 41 views
Month 41: 32 views
Month 42: 16 views
Month 43: 44 views
Month 44: 18 views
Month 45: 12 views
Month 46: 28 views
Month 47: 27 views
Month 48: 28 views
Month 49: 28 views
Month 50: 33 views
Month 51: 25 views
Month 52: 22 views
Month 53: 39 views
Month 54: 25 views
Month 55: 43 views
Month 56: 36 views
Month 57: 38 views
Month 58: 22 views
Month 59: 17 views
Month 60: 20 views
Month 61: 42 views
Month 62: 44 views
Month 63: 38 views
Month 64: 48 views
Month 65: 38 views
Month 66: 30 views
Month 67: 28 views
Month 68: 29 views
Month 69: 37 views
Month 70: 22 views
Month 71: 30 views
Month 72: 41 views
Month 73: 30 views
Month 74: 31 views
Month 75: 33 views
Month 76: 29 views
Month 77: 28 views
Month 78: 44 views
Month 79: 40 views
Month 80: 35 views
Month 81: 29 views
Month 82: 25 views
Month 83: 44 views
Month 84: 33 views
Month 85: 48 views
Month 86: 30 views
Month 87: 18 views
Month 88: 41 views
Month 89: 30 views
Month 90: 30 views
Month 91: 23 views
Month 92: 47 views
Month 93: 41 views
Month 94: 37 views
Month 95: 16 views
Month 96: 47 views
Month 97: 23 views
Month 98: 37 views
Month 99: 40 views
Month 100: 23 views
Month 101: 36 views
Month 102: 24 views
Month 103: 19 views
Month 104: 26 views
Month 105: 29 views
Month 106: 49 views
Month 107: 39 views
Month 108: 38 views
Month 109: 72 views
Month 110: 50 views
Month 111: 47 views
Month 112: 37 views
Month 113: 44 views
Month 114: 38 views
Month 115: 32 views
Month 116: 17 views
Month 117: 29 views
Month 118: 19 views
Month 119: 36 views
Month 120: 24 views

Total Views: 1.8K

Total Downloads: 146

All Trends