Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open High Ligation Procedure for Varicocele

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open High Ligation Procedure for Varicocele

Rohit Maheshwari

Contact

Rajendra Mandia

Contact

Puneet Malik

Contact

Kulbhushan Haldeniya

Contact

to Rajasthan University of Health Sciences

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open High Ligation Procedure for Varicocele

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

Y9522

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open High Ligation Procedure for Varicocele Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Varicocele is an important cause of infertility which can be corrected by surgery. We aim to assess and compare efficacy of laparoscopic and open palomo`s technique for varicocele. A total of 70 patients were taken in our study to assess the efficacy of treatment. Open high ligation was done on 36 patients and laparoscopic high ligation was done on 34 patients. The hospital stay was more in patients of open group than of laparoscopic group. Also, patients of laparoscopic group returned to normal activities earlier than with open group. Recurrence rates were 0% and 5.6%, post-operative hydrocele occurrence was 2.9% and 8.3%, wound complication was 0% and 5.5%, scrotal edema was 2.9% and 8.3%, and orchitis was 0% and 2.8% in laparoscopic and open group respectively. Also, post-operative pain was more in open group. There was improvement in seminal analysis in patients of both groups.

References

13 Cites in Article

Reference Format

H Nguyen (2007). Hernia, hydroceles, testicular torsion, and varicocele.
S Cayan,T Kadioglu,A Tefekli,A Kadioglu,S Tellaloglu (2000). Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgeryand microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele.
Sushil Prabakaran,Philip Kumanov,Analia Tomova,Stanislav Hubaveshki,Ashok Agarwal (2006). Adolescent Varicocele: Association with Somatometric Parameters.
Daniel Delaney,Michael Carr,Thomas Kolon,Howard Snyder,Stephen Zderic (2004). The physical characteristics of young males with varicocele.
M May,K Taymoorian,S Beutner,C Helke,K Braun,M Lein,J Roigas,B Hoschke (2006). Body size and weight as predisposing factors in varicocele.
J Donovan,H Winfield (1992). Laparoscopic varix ligation.
Tadashi Matsuda,Yasuki Horii,Shin Higashi,Kenji Oishi,Hideo Takeuchi,Osamu Yoshida (1992). Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy: A Simple Technique for Clip Ligation of the Spermatic Vessels.
A Barqawi,P Furness,M Koyle (2002). Laparoscopic Palomo varicocelectomy in the adolescent is safe after previous ipsilateral inguinal surgery.
K Masha,K Saadat,A Pervez,H Nawaz,S Ahmed,S Tareen (2003). Bedside Patent Ductus Arteriosus Ligation in Premature Infants.
E Poulsen,H Willumsen,H Col Sturp,K Jensen (1994). Varicocele of the testis. A comparison between laparoscopic and conventional surgery.
W Lynch,D Badenoch,O Mcanena (1993). Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Ligation of the Testicular Vein.
V Ulker,H Garibyan,K Kurth (1997). Comparison of inguinal and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of varicocele.
M Schlesinger,I Wilets,H Nagler (1994). Treatment outcome after varicocelectomy.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Rohit Maheshwari. 2014. \u201cComparison of Laparoscopic and Open High Ligation Procedure for Varicocele\u201d. Unknown Journal GJMR-I Volume 14 (GJMR Volume 14 Issue I5).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMR Volume 14 Issue I5

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Keywords

high ligation Infertility laparoscopic varicocele

Submission ReceivedDecember 16, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 5, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 104

Country: India

Subject: Uncategorized

Authors: Rohit Maheshwari, Rajendra Mandia, Puneet Malik, Kulbhushan Haldeniya (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 198

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4501

Total Downloads (simulated): 2227

Publish Date: 2014 12, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 36 views
Month 2: 45 views
Month 3: 36 views
Month 4: 28 views
Month 5: 36 views
Month 6: 37 views
Month 7: 28 views
Month 8: 19 views
Month 9: 18 views
Month 10: 41 views
Month 11: 43 views
Month 12: 21 views
Month 13: 19 views
Month 14: 35 views
Month 15: 29 views
Month 16: 22 views
Month 17: 32 views
Month 18: 28 views
Month 19: 29 views
Month 20: 39 views
Month 21: 30 views
Month 22: 20 views
Month 23: 43 views
Month 24: 27 views
Month 25: 41 views
Month 26: 32 views
Month 27: 38 views
Month 28: 34 views
Month 29: 29 views
Month 30: 14 views
Month 31: 18 views
Month 32: 42 views
Month 33: 49 views
Month 34: 19 views
Month 35: 19 views
Month 36: 36 views
Month 37: 33 views
Month 38: 28 views
Month 39: 35 views
Month 40: 33 views
Month 41: 18 views
Month 42: 12 views
Month 43: 37 views
Month 44: 46 views
Month 45: 36 views
Month 46: 25 views
Month 47: 38 views
Month 48: 36 views
Month 49: 36 views
Month 50: 25 views
Month 51: 32 views
Month 52: 36 views
Month 53: 40 views
Month 54: 30 views
Month 55: 32 views
Month 56: 33 views
Month 57: 42 views
Month 58: 21 views
Month 59: 20 views
Month 60: 40 views
Month 61: 39 views
Month 62: 29 views
Month 63: 26 views
Month 64: 33 views
Month 65: 33 views
Month 66: 34 views
Month 67: 32 views
Month 68: 27 views
Month 69: 42 views
Month 70: 16 views
Month 71: 27 views
Month 72: 34 views
Month 73: 30 views
Month 74: 39 views
Month 75: 24 views
Month 76: 40 views
Month 77: 42 views
Month 78: 32 views
Month 79: 30 views
Month 80: 41 views
Month 81: 25 views
Month 82: 37 views
Month 83: 37 views
Month 84: 40 views
Month 85: 46 views
Month 86: 21 views
Month 87: 40 views
Month 88: 39 views
Month 89: 24 views
Month 90: 42 views
Month 91: 26 views
Month 92: 35 views
Month 93: 32 views
Month 94: 33 views
Month 95: 15 views
Month 96: 31 views
Month 97: 42 views
Month 98: 46 views
Month 99: 22 views
Month 100: 35 views
Month 101: 37 views
Month 102: 31 views
Month 103: 29 views
Month 104: 29 views
Month 105: 20 views
Month 106: 33 views
Month 107: 31 views
Month 108: 39 views
Month 109: 50 views
Month 110: 38 views
Month 111: 13 views
Month 112: 25 views
Month 113: 25 views
Month 114: 41 views
Month 115: 35 views
Month 116: 14 views
Month 117: 17 views
Month 118: 35 views
Month 119: 24 views
Month 120: 45 views
Month 121: 24 views
Month 122: 16 views
Month 123: 23 views
Month 124: 26 views
Month 125: 22 views
Month 126: 22 views
Month 127: 28 views
Month 128: 24 views
Month 129: 38 views
Month 130: 44 views
Month 131: 34 views
Month 132: 30 views
Month 133: 28 views
Month 134: 17 views
Month 135: 57 views
Month 136: 47 views
Month 137: 67 views
Month 138: 24 views

Total Views: 4501

Total Downloads: 2227

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]