Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup

Ainhoa Toro-Ibarguen; Ismael Aunon-Martin; VerAnica Jimenez-DAaz

Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup

Ainhoa Toro-Ibarguen * §

Contact

Ismael Aunon-Martin §

Contact

VerAnica Jimenez-DAaz §

Contact

edelgado.hdoc §

Contact

j.morenobeamud §

Contact

§ Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid, Spain)

Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

BE1O6

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The current study evaluated the outcome of a retrospective series of 37 revision total hip arthroplasties with severe acetabular bone defects reconstruction using an antiprotrusio cage. We aimed to compare the peri and postoperative complications and mid-term outcomes of two groups, a reconstruction using a dual mobility cup (DMC) cemented into the cage (n=14) or a cemented simple polyethylene cup (SPEC) (n=23) at a mean follow-up of 5 years. We found an inverse association between the use of DMCs and both dislocation rate (p

References

14 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. Julien Wegrzyn,Andrew Thoreson,Olivier Guyen,David Lewallen,Kai‐nan An (2013). Cementation of a dual‐mobility acetabular component into a well‐fixed metal shell during revision total hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical validation. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 31(6), 991-997.
2. Wayne Paprosky,Paul Perona,Jeffrey Lawrence (1994). Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 9(1), 33-44.
3. R Merle D'aubigné (1970). Numerical classification of the function of the hip. Rev ChirOrthop, 56, 481-486.
4. De Lee,J Charnley,J (1976). Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. ClinOrthopRelat Res, 121, 20-32.
5. C Ranawat,L Dorr,A Inglis (1980). Total hip arthroplasty in protrusion acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 62, 1059-1065.
6. R Conn,Lfa Paterson,R Stauffer (1985). Long-Term Results of Acetabular Reconstruction Using Impaction Bone Grafting and a Cemented Cup. Impaction Bone Grafting in Revision Arthroplasty, 9, 306-325.
7. Neil Sheth,Charles Nelson,Bryan Springer,Thomas Fehring,Wayne Paprosky (2013). Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 21(3), 128-139.
8. Antonio Coscujuela-Mañá,Francesc Angles,Carles Tramunt,Xavier Casanova (2010). Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study. Hip International, 20(Suppl. 7), 112-118.
9. O Guyen,V Pibarot,G Vaz (2009). Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. ClinOrthopRelat Res, 467, 465.
10. O Guyen,D Lewallen,M Cabanela (2008). Modes of failure of Osteonics constrained tripolar implants: a retrospective analysis of forty-three failed implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 90, 1553-1560.
11. R Philippot,F Farizon,J Camilleri (2008). Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 94, 23-e27.
12. Moussa Hamadouche,David Biau,Denis Huten,Thierry Musset,François Gaucher (2010). The Use of a Cemented Dual Mobility Socket to Treat Recurrent Dislocation. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 468(12), 3248-3254.
13. F Langlais,M Ropars,F Gaucher (2008). Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466, 389-395.
14. L Schneider,R Phillipot,B Boyer,F Farizon (2011). Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstrcuction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 97, 807-813.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ainhoa Toro-Ibarguen, Ismael Aunon-Martin, VerAnica Jimenez-DAaz, edelgado.hdoc, j.morenobeamud. 2014. "Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup". Global Journal of Medical Research - H: Orthopedic & Musculoskeletal System GJMR-H Volume 14 (GJMR Volume 14 Issue H1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMR Volume 14 Issue H1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

dual mobility cup hip dislocation hip instability reinforcement cage device revision total hip arthroplasty total hip arthroplasty

Classification

GJMR-H Classification NLMC Code: WE 312

Submission ReceivedDecember 8, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 6, 2014

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 105

Country: Spain

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research - H: Orthopedic & Musculoskeletal System

Authors: Ainhoa Toro-Ibarguen, Ismael AuAAn-MartAn, VerAnica Jimenez-DAaz, Emilio Delgado-DAaz, Jose Alberto Moreno-Beamud (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 273

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1503

Total Downloads (simulated): 79

Publish Date: 2014 01, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 56 views
Month 2: 55 views
Month 3: 25 views
Month 4: 35 views
Month 5: 62 views
Month 6: 44 views
Month 7: 30 views
Month 8: 46 views
Month 9: 55 views
Month 10: 50 views
Month 11: 38 views
Month 12: 27 views
Month 13: 16 views
Month 14: 30 views
Month 15: 34 views
Month 16: 24 views
Month 17: 32 views
Month 18: 30 views
Month 19: 48 views
Month 20: 38 views
Month 21: 35 views
Month 22: 33 views
Month 23: 27 views
Month 24: 16 views
Month 25: 25 views
Month 26: 26 views
Month 27: 24 views
Month 28: 35 views
Month 29: 27 views
Month 30: 44 views
Month 31: 49 views
Month 32: 16 views
Month 33: 21 views
Month 34: 32 views
Month 35: 14 views
Month 36: 19 views
Month 37: 34 views
Month 38: 42 views
Month 39: 26 views
Month 40: 22 views
Month 41: 45 views
Month 42: 42 views
Month 43: 31 views
Month 44: 31 views
Month 45: 23 views
Month 46: 31 views
Month 47: 28 views
Month 48: 47 views
Month 49: 30 views
Month 50: 32 views
Month 51: 35 views
Month 52: 39 views
Month 53: 32 views
Month 54: 37 views
Month 55: 32 views
Month 56: 24 views
Month 57: 20 views
Month 58: 39 views
Month 59: 32 views
Month 60: 14 views
Month 61: 35 views
Month 62: 28 views
Month 63: 37 views
Month 64: 41 views
Month 65: 37 views
Month 66: 15 views
Month 67: 38 views
Month 68: 20 views
Month 69: 37 views
Month 70: 21 views
Month 71: 21 views
Month 72: 36 views
Month 73: 29 views
Month 74: 20 views
Month 75: 36 views
Month 76: 18 views
Month 77: 41 views
Month 78: 40 views
Month 79: 28 views
Month 80: 23 views
Month 81: 16 views
Month 82: 11 views
Month 83: 23 views
Month 84: 21 views
Month 85: 31 views
Month 86: 25 views
Month 87: 40 views
Month 88: 37 views
Month 89: 36 views
Month 90: 29 views
Month 91: 39 views
Month 92: 45 views
Month 93: 33 views
Month 94: 39 views
Month 95: 47 views
Month 96: 37 views
Month 97: 37 views
Month 98: 39 views
Month 99: 42 views
Month 100: 25 views
Month 101: 38 views
Month 102: 29 views
Month 103: 16 views
Month 104: 30 views
Month 105: 36 views
Month 106: 25 views
Month 107: 36 views
Month 108: 32 views
Month 109: 37 views
Month 110: 23 views
Month 111: 34 views
Month 112: 38 views
Month 113: 13 views
Month 114: 39 views
Month 115: 33 views
Month 116: 41 views
Month 117: 26 views
Month 118: 35 views
Month 119: 23 views
Month 120: 22 views
Month 121: 30 views
Month 122: 43 views
Month 123: 22 views
Month 124: 39 views
Month 125: 21 views
Month 126: 37 views
Month 127: 35 views
Month 128: 15 views
Month 129: 45 views
Month 130: 45 views
Month 131: 36 views
Month 132: 38 views
Month 133: 26 views
Month 134: 11 views
Month 135: 43 views
Month 136: 25 views
Month 137: 23 views
Month 138: 35 views
Month 139: 36 views
Month 140: 36 views
Month 141: 45 views
Month 142: 35 views
Month 143: 40 views
Month 144: 46 views
Month 145: 32 views
Month 146: 41 views
Month 147: 22 views
Month 148: 38 views
Month 149: 31 views
Month 150: 46 views
Month 151: 22 views
Month 152: 53 views
Month 153: 32 views
Month 154: 39 views

Total Views: 1.5K

Total Downloads: 79

All Trends