Comparison of Subjective Dizziness, Tinnitus, Headache, Taste, and Smell Results by Age Group in Yakumo Town Residents Health Checkup Conducted in 2019 with Measured Taste and Smell Test Results

§ Nagoya Womens University

Send Message

To: Author

Comparison of Subjective Dizziness, Tinnitus, Headache, Taste, and Smell Results by Age Group in Yakumo Town Residents Health Checkup Conducted in 2019 with Measured Taste and Smell Test Results

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

5QM3K

Comparison of Subjective Dizziness, Tinnitus, Headache, Taste, and Smell Results by Age Group in Yakumo Town Residents Health Checkup Conducted in 2019 with Measured Taste and Smell Test Results Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

I. INTRODUCTION

Based on the Health Promotion Law, health Japan 21 was issued as Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare No.430 in 2012.Public health centers of local governments are conducting Health Japan 21 according to local conditions in accordance with the policy set out by the Japanese government. Currently, Health Japan 212 nd plan is being carried out.

The Healthy Japan 21 2 nd plan includes nine different types of content (nutrition and diet, physical activity and exercise, rest and mental health, tobacco, health care, dental health, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer), In addition, each basic plan and goals are shown in it.

Currently, health management aimed at improving productivity has begun to be implemented with the goal to maintain the health of workers in Japan. This is because it is essential to raise the health condition of each employee and improve productivity due to the social background of a declining working population, an aging workforce, and an increase in national medical expenses in Japan. A feeling of dizziness, a headache, or a minor discomfort can significantly affect productivity. Therefore, in this study, we report the results of a self-administered questionnaire survey conducted in 2019 on subjective dizziness, tinnitus, and headache at resident health checkups in Yakumo Town, Hokkaido, Japan, where there is little population movement. From 2027 to 2019, we have continuously conducted taste and smell test results at the time of the Yakumo town resident health checkups. Using these results, we will report a comparison by age group. Although many sensory organs have been reported to deteriorate with age, there have been few reports on the interrelationships among taste, smell, hearing and vision.

In recent years, many reports have revealed that reduced sense of smell and decreased sense of taste occur as precursors of cognitive decline.

In recent years, there have been many reports that cognitive function declines when hearing declines. Therefore, this study also reports on the relationship between taste and smell test results and other test results in residents aged 40 and over in Yakumo Town, Hokkaido, Japan resident health checkups.

II. MATERIAL AND METHOD

A total of 297 participants, 128 male and 169 female aged 40 and over, participated in the health checkup for residents of Yakumo Town, Hokkaido, Japan, in August 2019. The subjects of the self-reported questionnaire survey were subjective dizziness, subjective tinnitus, subjective headache, subjective taste, and subjective sense of smell.

A simple salty taste test kit (salsave: manufactured by Advantech) was used for the taste test. A simple olfactory test kit (smell stick: manufactured by Daiichi Kogyo Co., Ltd.) was used for the olfactory test.

The obtained data were compared using statistical methods. A binomial logistic regression analysis was used. The objective variable was subjective dizziness, and the explanatory variables were subjective tinnitus, headache, taste, smell, taste test results, and smell test results. The statistical software used was Excel Statistics 2020 (SSRI Co.,).

A quick saltiness test recorded perceptible concentrations within six concentrations (0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0%, 1.2%, 1.4%, 1.6%). The salty taste was categorized into three categories: 0.6% to 1.0% salty taste is the normal range, 1.2% to 1.6% requires observation, and 1.6% or more requires consultation.

A simple olfactory test using 12 different odors (Japanese ink, wood, perfume, menthol, mandarin orange, curry, household gas, rose, cypress, stuffy socks, condensed milk, and fried garlic) and recorded the number of smells. Of the 12 types of odors, if six or more classes were recognized, they were classified as normal range; if 5 to 3 classes observation was required; and if two classes or less, consultation was required.

III. RESULTS

As shown in Table 1, the participants were 33 in their 40s, 63 in their 50s, 116 in their 60s, 76 in their 70s, and eight in their 80s.

Table 1 Age distribution of participants (n=297) Table 2 shows subjective dizziness by age group. Among participants in their 50s, 50s, and 60s, more male participants than female participants answered that they did not feel subjective dizziness. In addition, it was found that many females in their 50shas a personal feeling of dizziness.

40s50s60s70s80s
Male (n=128)102449396
Female (n=169)233967373
Total (n=297)3363116769

Table 2 Subjective dizziness in each age group numbetr ( % )

MaleMale (n=128)
NoneSomtimesCommonNo answer
40s (n=10)9 (90.0%)1 (10.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
50s (n=24)19 (79.2%)4 (16.7%)1 (4.2%)0 (0.0%)
60s (n=49)40 (81.6%)8 (16.3%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.0%)
70s (n=39)31 (79.5%)7 (17.9%)1 (2.6%)0 (0.0%)
80s (n=6)4 (66.7%)2 (33.3%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Total 128103 (80.5%)22 (17.2%)2 (1.6%)1 (0.8%)
FemaleFemale (n=169)
NoneSomtimesCommonNo answer
40s (n=23)16 (69.6%)5 (21.7%)1 (4.3%)1 (4.3%)
50s (n=39)24 (61.5%)14 (35.9%)1 (2.6%)0 (0.0%)
60s (n=67)50 (74.6%)13 (19.4%)3 (4.5%)1 (1.5%)
70s (n=37)33 (89.2%)4 (10.8%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
80s (n=3)3 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Total 169126 (74.6%)36 (21.3%)5 (3.0%)2 (1.2%)

Table 3 shows subjective tinnitus for each age group. The proportion of males and females in their 40s, 50s, and 60s who did not experience subjective tinnitus was about the same (60-66%).

Table3 Subjective tinnitus in each age group numbetr ( % )

MaleMale (n=128)
NoneOccasionallyAlwaysNo answer
40s (n=10)6 (60.0%)3 (30.0%)1 (10.0%)0 (0.0%)
50s (n=24)16 (66.7%)7 (29.2%)1 (4.2%)0 (0.0%)
60s (n=49)30 (61.2%)14 (28.6%)5 (10.2%)0 (0.0%)
70s (n=39)25 (64.1%)8 (20.5%)6 (15.4%)0 (0.0%)
80s (n=6)4 (66.7%)1 (16.7%)1 (16.7%)0 (0.0%)
Total 12881 (63.3%)33 (25.8%)14 (10.9%)0 (0.0%)
FemaleFemale (n=169)
NoneOccasionallyAlwaysNo answer
40s (n=23)14 (60.9%)9 (39.1%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
50s (n=39)25 (64.1%)14 (35.9%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
60s (n=67)44 (65.7%)17 (25.4%)6 (9.0%)0 (0.0%)
70s (n=37)27 (73.0%)7 (18.9%)3 (8.1%)0 (0.0%)
80s (n=3)1 (33.3%)1 (33.3%)1 (33.3%)0 (0.0%)
Total 169111 (65.7%)48 (28.4%)10 (5.9%)0 (0.0%)

Table 4 shows the results of the dizziness questionnaire. It is found that female participants were feeling headaches more than males in each age group.

Table 4 Subjective headache in each age group numbetr ( % )

MaleMale (n=128)
NoneOccasionallySometimesAlways
40s (n=10)10 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
50s (n=24)24 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
60s (n=49)49 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
70s (n=39)38 (97.4%)1 (2.6%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
80s (n=6)6 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Total 128127 (99.2%)1 (0.8%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
FemaleFemale (n=169)
NoneOccasionallySometimesAlways
40s (n=23)14 (60.9%)9 (39.1%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
50s (n=39)34 (87.2%)5 (12.8%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
60s (n=67)60 (89.6%)7 (10.4%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
70s (n=37)35 (94.6%)2 (5.4%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
80s (n=3)3 (100.0%)0(0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Total 169146 (86.4%)23 (13.6%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)

Table 5 Subjective sense of smell in each age group numbetr ( % )

MaleMale (n=128)
NoneHard to understandSomewhat confusingunderstand
40s (n=10)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (10.0%)9 (90.0%)
50s (n=24)0(0.0%)0 (0.0%)5 (10.8%)19 (79.2%)
60s (n=49)4 (8.2%)2 (4.1%)10 (20.4%)33 (67.3%)
70s (n=39)2 (5.1%)2 (5.1%)12 (30.8%)23 (59.0%)
80s (n=6)0 (0.0%)1 (16.7%)2 (33.3%)3 (50.0%)
Total 1286 (4.7%)5 (3.9%)30 (23.4%)87 (68.0%)
FemaleFemale (n=169)
NoneHard to understandSomewhat confusingunderstand
40s (n=23)0 (0.0%)1 (4.3%)3 (13.0%)19 (82.6%)
50s (n=39)0 (0.0%)1 (2.6%)5 (12.8%)33 (84.6%)
60s (n=67)2 (3.0%)1 (1.5%)12 (19.9%)52 (77.6%)
70s (n=37)1 (2.7%)0 (0.0%)7 (18.9%)29 (78.4%)
80s (n=3)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)2 (66,7%)1 (33.3%)
Total 1693 (1.8%)3 (1.8%)29 (17.2%)134 (79.3%)

Table 6 shows the subjective sense of taste for each age group. Compared to males, females answered that they could appreciate the taste of each age group. However, the effect of aging was small in both males and females.

Table 6 Subjective sense of taste in each age group numbetr ( % )

MaleMale (n=128)
NoneHard to understandSomewhat confusingunderstand
40s (n=10)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (10.0%)9 (90.0%)
50s (n=24)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)5 (10.8%)19 (79.2%)
60s (n=49)1 (2.0%)3 (6.1%)3 (6.1%)41 (83.7%)
70s (n=39)0 (0.0%)1 (2.5%)9 (23.1%)29 (74.4%)
80s (n=6)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)3 (%50.0)3 (50.0%)
Total 1281 (0.8%)4 (3.1%)21 (16.4%)101 (78.9%)
FemaleFemale (n=169)
NoneHard to understandSomewhat confusingunderstand
40s (n=23)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)22 (100.0%)
50s (n=39)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)39 (100.0%)
60s (n=67)2 (3.0%)0 (0.0%)5 (7.5%)60 (89.6%)
70s (n=37)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)4 (10.8%)33 (89.2%)
80s (n=3)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)3 (100.0%)
Total 1692 (1.2%)0 (0.0%)9 (5.3%)157 (92.9%)

Table 7 shows the results of the 12 odor tests more males in their 50s to 80s who had less recognition on the odor sticks. It has been found that the sense of of odor than females. smell declines with aging. It was found that there was

Table 7 Olfactory test results in each age group numbetr ( % )

MaleMale (n=128)
Normal rangeObservation requiredConsultation requiredNo answer
40s (n=10)10 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
50s (n=24)20 (83.3%)3 (12.5%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
60s (n=49)32 (65.3%)13 (26.5%)4 (8.2%)0 (0.0%)
70s (n=39)21 (53.8%)11 (28.2%)7 (17.9%)0 (0.0%)
80s (n=6)3 (50.0%)2 (33.3%)1 (16.6%)0 (0.0%)
Total 12886 (67.2%)29 (22.6%)12 (0.9%)0 (0.0%)
FemaleFemale (n=169)
Normal rangeObservation requiredConsultation requiredNo answer
40s (n=23)22 (95.6%)1 (4.3%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
50s (n=39)37 (94.9%)2 (5.1%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
60s (n=67)62 (92.5%)4 (10.3%)1 (1.5%)0 (0.0%)
70s (n=37)28 (75.7%)28 (75.7%)1 (2.7%)0 (0.0%)
80s (n=3)2 (66.7%)1 (33.3%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Total 169151 (89.3%)36 (21.3%)2 (1.2%)0 (0.0%)

Table 8 shows the salty taste test results by Salsave. There was no difference in the results of the salty taste test between males and females. However, there were more males than females who required consultation.

Table 8 Taste test results in each age group numbetr ( % )

MaleMale (n=128)
Normal rangeObservation requiredConsultation requiredNo answer
40s (n=10)9 (90.0%)1 (10.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
50s (n=24)18 (75.0%)3 (12.5%)3 (12.5%)0 (0.0%)
60s (n=49)487.89 (%)1 (2.4%)5 (10.2%)0 (0.0%)
70s (n=39)30 (76.9%)2 (5.1%)7 (17.9%)0 (0.0%)
80s (n=6)6 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Total 128106 (82.8%)7 (5.5%)15 (11.7%)0 (0.0%)
FemaleFemale (n=169)
Normal rangeObservation requiredConsultation requiredNo answer
40s (n=23)19 (82.6%)3 (13.0%)1 (4.3%)0 (0.0%)
50s (n=39)32 (82.1%)5 (12.8%)2 (5.1%)0 (0.0%)
60s (n=67)56 (83.6%)8 (11.9%)3 (4.5%)0 (0.0%)
70s (n=37)31 (83.8%)3 (8.1%)3 (8.1%)0 (0.0%)
80s (n=3)2 (66.7%)0 (0.0%)1 (33.1%)0 (0.0%)
Total 169140 (82.8%)19 (11.2%)10 (5.9%)0 (0.0%)

Table 9 shows the olfactory test results. The number of recognizable odors among 12 types of odors was recorded. It was shown that the number of perceived odors decreased as the age of the participants increased.

Table 9 Actual measurment results of the number of cognitions of twelve types of olfactory tests

MaleMale (n=128)
01234567891011
40s (n=10)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (10.0%)2 (20.0%)1 (10.0%)2 (20.0%)1 (10.0%)2 (20.0%)
50s (n=24)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (4.2%)1 (4.2%)2 (8.3%)2 (8.3%)0 (0.0%)4 (16.7%)7 (29.2%)6 (25.0%)1 (4.2%)
60s (n=49)4 (8.2%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)2 (4.1%)4 (8.2%)7 (14.3%)4 (8.2%)9 (18.4%)7 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)6 (12.2%)3 (6.2%)
70s (n=39)3 (7.7%)1 (5.1%)1 (2.6%)3 (7.7%)4 (10.3%)5 (12.8%)4 (10.3%)0 (0.0%)5 (12.8%)5 (12.8%)2 (5.1%)3 (7.7%)
80s (n=6)0 (0.0%)1 (16.7%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)2 (33.3%)1 (16.7%)0 (0.0%)1 (16.7%)1 (16.7%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Total 1287 (5.5%)3 (2.3%)1 (0.8%)6 (4.7%)9 (7.0%)16 (12.5%)12 (9.4%)11 (8.6%)18 (14.1%)17 (13.3%)15 (11.7%)9 (7.0%)
FemaleFemale (n=169)
01234567891011
40s (n=23)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (4.3%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)7 (30.4%)4 (17.4%)5 (21.7%)2 (17.4%)
50s (n=39)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)2 (5.1%)1 (2.6%)1 (2.6%)6 (15.4%)7 (17.9%)7 (17.9%)4 (17.4%)
60s (n=67)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.5%)0 (0.0%)4 6.0%0 (0.0%)6 (9.0%)5 (7.5%)10 (14.8%)8 (11.9%)9 (13.4%)18 (26.9%)
70s (n=37)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.7%)1 (2.7%)1 (2.7%)6 (16.2%)4 (10.8%)2 (5.4%)8 (21.6%)7 (18.9%)6 (16.2%)1 (2.7%)
80s (n=3)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (33.3%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (33.3%)1 (33.3%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Total 1690 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)2 (1.2%)2 (1.2%)6 (3.6%)8 (4.7%)11 (6.5%)9 (5.3%)32 (18.9%)26 (15.4%)27 (16.0%)34 (20.1%)

Table 10 shows the salty taste test results. There was no age-related difference in saltiness perceived by the participants in both males and females.

Table 10 Cognitive resultsof salt concentration in a salty taste test (number:%)

MaleMale (n=128)
0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.60% more
40s (n=10)3 (30.0%)4 (40.0%)0 (0.0%)2 (20.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (10.0%)0 (0.0%)
50s (n=24)11 (45.6%)2 (8.2%)3 (12.5%)2 (8.2%)0 (0.0%)3 (12.5%)3 (12.5%)
60s (n=49)23 (46.9%)8 (16.3%)8 (16.3%)4 (8.2%)1 (2.0%)5 (10.2%)0 (0.0%)
70s (n=39)18 (46.2%)9 (23.1%)4 (10.3%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.6%)1 (2.6%)6 (15.4%)
80s (n=6)1 (16.7%)2 (33.3%)2 (33.3%)1 (16.7%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Total 12856 (43.8%)25 (19.5%)17 (13.3%)9 (7.0%)2 (1.6%)10 (7.8%)9 (7.0%)
FemaleFemale (n=169)
0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.60% more
40s (n=23)12 (52.2%)2 (8.7%)4 (17.4%)1 (4.3%)2 (8.7%)1 (4.3%)1 (4.3%)
50s (n=39)19 (48.7%)11 (28.2%)2 (5.1%)0 (0.0%)5 (12.8%)0 (0.0%)2 (5.1%)
60s (n=67)32 (47.8%)17 (25.4%)5 (7.5%)2 (3.0%)4 (6.0%)3 (4.5%)4 (6.0%)
70s (n=37)16 (43.8%)9 (24.3%)4 (10.8%)1 (2.7%)2 (5.2%)2 (5.4%)3 (8.1)
80s (n=3)1 (33.3%)1 (33.3%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (33.3%)
Total 16980 (47.3%)40 (23.7%)15 (8.9%)4 (2.4%)13 (7.7%)5 (3.6%)11 (6.5%)

A binomial logistic regression analysis was used. The objective variable was subjective dizziness, and the explanatory variables were subjective tinnitus, headache, taste, smell, taste test results, and smell test results.

Table 11 shows the relationship with diseases that can be understood from the questionnaire results.

As for items related to dizziness, the results of obesity, urinalysis, fundus examination, lipid examination, and inflammation examination were shown.

It was shown that subjective dizziness is related to the obesity, dermatitis, swollen eyes, and coughing.

Table 11 Results of binomial logistic analysis of subjective dizziness and other test results (Variables included in the regression equation (partial regression coefficient confidence interval)

Variableence intervals for partial regression cconfidence interval for the oddsce test for partial regression cc
egression coandr ernartial regression lower limitUpper limiOdds ratiolower limitUpper limiWaldree of freeP value: *P<0.05, **P0.01
Gender0.23580.45630.1168-0.56861.13011.25690.51763.0960.26710.6054
Age-0.02810.0223-0.2786-0.07180.01560.97230.93071.01571.592310.207
Urology comprehensive judgment0.12060.33920.0872-0.544197,8541.12820.58032.19330.126510.7221
Summary Obesity0.91440.42020.51450.09081.7382.94531.0955.68594.735110.0296
Summary Urinalysis-1.30250.4709-0.8078-2.2254-0.37960.27190.1080.68427.65110.0057
Summary blood pressure0.06650.16890.0862-0.26450.39751.06870.76761.48810.154910.6939
Summary electrocardiogram-0.61850.3584-0.4027-1.32090.08380.53870.26691.08742.979310.0843
Summary fundus examination-0.89720.3451-0.7467-1.5736-0.22080.40770.20730.80196.758610.0093
Summary anemia test-0.95060.4669-0.4718-1.76580.06460.42720.17111.06673.318310.0685
Summary diabetes test-0.16680.3191-0.15-0.79220.45850.84640.45291.58180.273310.6011
Summary liver function tests-0.06230.3552-0.0372-0.75860.6340.93960.46831.88510.030710.8608
Summary renal function test0.35750.42530.1896-0.47611.19111.42980.62123.29070.706510.4006
Summary lipid test0.71250.1740.97360.37141.05352.0391.44972.867816.759910.0001
Summary gout test0.80810.46390.3312-0.10111.71742.24370.90385.573.034710.0815
Summary inflammation test6.13171.04271.86174.0888.1755460.23559.62033552.75434.578910.0001

In addition, Table 12 shows the results of the comparison with the questionnaire results in the field of otolaryngology. A subjective feeling of dizziness was shown to be associated with tinnitus, headache, and measured olfactory test results. There was a statistically significant difference between subjective dizziness and odor test results.

Table 12 Results of binomial logistic analysis of subjective dizziness and otorhinolaryngology test results (Variables included in the regression equation (partial regression coefficient confidence interval)

Variableence intervals for partial regression confidence interval for the odds test for partial regression co
regression coefstandard ernattial regression lower limitUpper limitOdds ratioLower limitUpper limitWaldree of freeP value: *P<0.05, **P0.01
Gender0.0260.3430.0128-0.64630.69831.02630.5242.01020.00571 0.9397
Age-0.00850.0164-0.0844-0.04070.02370.99150.96011.0240.2681 0.6047
Subjective tinnitus0.75560.23390.48460.29721.2142.12891.3463.36710.4361 0.0012 **
Subjective headache1.3040.50070.35180.32272.28543.68421.38099.82946.78351 0.0092 **
Subjective sense of smell-0.4210.253-0.28-0.91690.07490.65640.39971.07772.76911 0.0961
Subjective sense of taste-0.4430.3099-0.2106-1.05170.16310.64130.34941.17712.05581 0.1516
Taste 3-level evaluation-0.36150.3445-0.3114-1.03670.31370.69670.35461.36851.10091 0.2941
Smell 3-level evaluation0.12580.3870.0864-0.63270.88441.13410.53112.42140.10571 0.7451
Olfactory measurement value0.19210.09760.53670.00090.38331.21181.0091.46723.87781 0.0489 *
Salt taste measurement value0.75970.74220.2932 ^0.69512.21442.13760.4999.15611.04751 0.3061

IV. DISCUSSION

From the results of this study, the degree of obesity, urine test results, fundus test results, lipid test results, and inflammation test results were shown as items related to subjective dizziness. In particular, it was revealed that the relationship with inflammatory reaction is substantial. In otolaryngology, there was a relationship between tinnitus, headache, olfactory perception tests results, and subjective dizziness.

Since participants with a higher olfactory recognition rate feel subjective dizziness, it may be that the dizziness is caused by being sensitive to odors. No relationship was found with the results of the questionnaire on food intake. This finding follows the previous report on questionnaire responses (the subjective evaluation of sensory functions) which differed from the sensory test result1-6). In the future, it will be necessary to investigate in detail the relationship between subjective dizziness and olfactory test results. Moreover, we need to investigate in detail the relationship between subjective dizziness and inflammation test results.

References

6 Cites in Article
  1. Ji Choi,Il Moon,Sun-Young Baek,Seon Kim,Yang-Sun Cho (2019). Discrepancies between self-reported hearing difficulty and hearing loss diagnosed by audiometry: prevalence and associated factors in a national survey.
  2. Do-Yang Park,Hyun Kim,Chang-Hoon Kim,Jae Lee,Kyungdo Han,Ji Choi (2018). Prevalence and relationship of olfactory dysfunction and tinnitus among middle- and old-aged population in Korea.
  3. Claire Murphy (2002). Prevalence of Olfactory Impairment in Older Adults.
  4. B Haxel,S Bertz-Duffy,K Fruth,S Letzel,W Mann,A Muttray (2012). Comparison of subjective olfaction ratings in patients with and without olfactory disorders.
  5. E Gözen,Chinara Aliyeva,Fırat Tevetoğlu,Rıdvan Karaali,İlker Balkan,H Yener,H Özdoğan (2021). Evaluation of Olfactory Function With Objective Tests in COVID-19-Positive Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
  6. A Hamalainen,M Pichora-Fuller,W Wittich,N Phillips,P Mick (2021). Self-report Measures of Hearing and Vision in Older Adults Participating in the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging are Explained by Behavioral Sensory Measures, Demographic, and Social Factors.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Naomi katayama, Shoko Kondo, Naomi Katayama. 2026. "Comparison of Subjective Dizziness, Tinnitus, Headache, Taste, and Smell Results by Age Group in Yakumo Town Residents Health Checkup Conducted in 2019 with Measured Taste and Smell Test Results". Global Journal of Medical Research - L: Nutrition GJMR-L Volume 22 (GJMR Volume 22 Issue L3).

Download Citation

Self-administered questionnaire on health and dietary habits among Yakumo residents.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords
Classification
GJMR-L Classification DDC Code: 791.4372 LCC Code: PN1997.2
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
January 16, 2023

Language
English
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 410
Total Downloads: 27
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Comparison of Subjective Dizziness, Tinnitus, Headache, Taste, and Smell Results by Age Group in Yakumo Town Residents Health Checkup Conducted in 2019 with Measured Taste and Smell Test Results

Naomi katayama
Naomi katayama Nagoya Womens University
Shoko Kondo
Shoko Kondo
Naomi Katayama
Naomi Katayama