Comparison of the Contamination Rate and Risk Factor Profile of Blood Culture Done in Emergency Department and MHDU/MICUs

Article ID

OF3R8

Comparison of the Contamination Rate and Risk Factor Profile of Blood Culture Done in Emergency Department and MHDU/MICUs

Pankaj Kumar Singh
Pankaj Kumar Singh
Dr. Pranav Kumar
Dr. Pranav Kumar
Mandeep Joshi
Mandeep Joshi
Shreya Verma
Shreya Verma
Shoily Nath
Shoily Nath
Shilpi Pawar
Shilpi Pawar
Arpan Roy Dutta
Arpan Roy Dutta
DOI

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To determine the risk factors of blood culture contamination done in ED and those done in the MHDU/MICU among patients admitted with medical illness. Material and Methods: This is a two months’ prospective observational study compari ng blood culture contamination rate and risk factors associated with contamination between ED and MICU/MHDU. A total of 998 patients were included in the study who underwent blood culture in ED and MICU/MHDU. 570 in ED and 428 in MICU/MHDU were included after meeting exclusion and inclusion criteria. Results: Blood culture growths were higher in ED (19%). Most common growth was CoNS (4%). The overall contamination rate in this study was (4.8%) The contamination rate was lower in ED (4.4%) when compared to MICU/MHDU (5.4%).

Comparison of the Contamination Rate and Risk Factor Profile of Blood Culture Done in Emergency Department and MHDU/MICUs

Aims and objectives: To determine the risk factors of blood culture contamination done in ED and those done in the MHDU/MICU among patients admitted with medical illness. Material and Methods: This is a two months’ prospective observational study compari ng blood culture contamination rate and risk factors associated with contamination between ED and MICU/MHDU. A total of 998 patients were included in the study who underwent blood culture in ED and MICU/MHDU. 570 in ED and 428 in MICU/MHDU were included after meeting exclusion and inclusion criteria. Results: Blood culture growths were higher in ED (19%). Most common growth was CoNS (4%). The overall contamination rate in this study was (4.8%) The contamination rate was lower in ED (4.4%) when compared to MICU/MHDU (5.4%).

Pankaj Kumar Singh
Pankaj Kumar Singh
Dr. Pranav Kumar
Dr. Pranav Kumar
Mandeep Joshi
Mandeep Joshi
Shreya Verma
Shreya Verma
Shoily Nath
Shoily Nath
Shilpi Pawar
Shilpi Pawar
Arpan Roy Dutta
Arpan Roy Dutta

No Figures found in article.

pankaj_kumar_singh. 2021. “. Global Journal of Medical Research – C: Microbiology & Pathology GJMR-C Volume 21 (GJMR Volume 21 Issue C2): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Classification
GJMR-C Classification: NLMC Code: WB 105, WX 215
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 2135
Total Downloads: 995
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Comparison of the Contamination Rate and Risk Factor Profile of Blood Culture Done in Emergency Department and MHDU/MICUs

Pankaj Kumar Singh
Pankaj Kumar Singh
Dr. Pranav Kumar
Dr. Pranav Kumar
Mandeep Joshi
Mandeep Joshi
Shreya Verma
Shreya Verma
Shoily Nath
Shoily Nath
Shilpi Pawar
Shilpi Pawar
Arpan Roy Dutta
Arpan Roy Dutta

Research Journals