Loading menu…

Comparison Study and Review on Object-Oriented Metrics

§ Amity university

Send Message

To: Author

Comparison Study and Review on Object-Oriented Metrics

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTHN25E

Comparison Study and Review on Object-Oriented Metrics Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The best elucidations to software development problems are regularly touted as objectoriented processes. The popularity of object-oriented design metrics is essential in software engineering for measuring the software complexity, estimating size, quality and project efforts. There are various approaches through which we can find the software cost estimation and predicates on various kinds of deliverable items. Object-oriented metrics assures to reduce cost and the maintenance effort by serving as early predictors to estimate software faults. Such an early quantification augments the quality of the final software. This paper reviews object-oriented metrics. A comparison table is maintained via which we can analyze the difference between all the objectoriented metrics effectively.

References

53 Cites in Article
  1. 1. C Neelamegam,M Punithavali (2011). A survey on object oriented quality metrics. Global journal of computer science and technologies, 183-186.
  2. 2. A Deepak,K Pooja,T Alpika,S Sharma (2011). Software quality estimation through object oriented design metrics. IJCSNS International journal of computer science and network security, 100-104.
  3. 3. A Henderson,Seller (1996). object oriented metrices: measure of complexity. object oriented metrices: measure of complexity
  4. 4. A Shaik,C Reddy,B Manda,K Deepti (2010). Metrics for object oriented design software system:A Survey. Journal of emerging trend in engineer and applied science, 190-198.
  5. 5. N Fenton (1996). Software metrices: a rigorous and practical approach. Software metrices: a rigorous and practical approach
  6. 6. L Briand,J Wuest,J Daly,V Porter (2000). Exploring the Relationships Between Design Measures and Software Quality In Object Oriented Systems. Journal of Systems and Software, 51
  7. 7. L Briand,W Melo,J Wust (2002). Assessing the applicability of fault-proneness models across object-oriented software projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(7), 706-720.
  8. 8. P Coad,E Yourdon (1990). Object Oriented Analysis. Object Oriented Analysis
  9. 9. W Li,S Henry (1995). Maintenance metrics for the object oriented paradigm. [1993] Proceedings First International Software Metrics Symposium, 52-60.
  10. 10. L Rosenberg,L Hyatt (1998). Applying and interpreting object oriented metrics. Proceedings of software technology conference
  11. 11. A Shyam,F Kemerer,Chris (1993). A Metrics Suite for Object-Oriented Design. M.I.T. Sloan School of Management, 53-315.
  12. 12. R Harrison,L Samaraweera,Dobie,P Lewis (1996). Comparing Programming Paradigms: An Evaluation of Functional and Object-Oriented Programs. Software Eng. J, 11, 247-254.
  13. 13. M Alshayeb,Wei Li (2003). An empirical validation of object-oriented metrics in two different iterative software processes. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(11), 1043-1049.
  14. 14. A Shyam,C Kemerer (1991). Towards a Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design. Proceeding on Object Oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications Conference (OOPSLA"91), 26, 197-211.
  15. 15. C Shyam,C Kemerer (1994). A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(6), 476-493.
  16. 16. Wei Li (1998). Another metric suite for object-oriented programming. Journal of Systems and Software, 44(2), 155-162.
  17. 17. C Jones (2007). Spon's Estimating Costs Guide to Plumbing and Heating. Spon's Estimating Costs Guide to Plumbing and Heating
  18. 18. V Basili,L Briand,W Melo (1994). A validation of object-oriented design metrics as quality indicators. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22(10), 751-761.
  19. 19. R Neal (1996). The Measurement Theory Validation of Proposed Object-Oriented Software Metrics. The Measurement Theory Validation of Proposed Object-Oriented Software Metrics
  20. 20. V Gurp,J Bosch (2001). Design, Implementation and Evolution of Object-Oriented Frameworks: Concepts and Guidelines. Software-Practice and Experience, 31(3), 277-300.
  21. 21. Hikaru Fujiwara,Shinji Kusumoto,Katsuro Inoue,Ayane Suzuki,Toshifusa Ootsubo,Katsuhiko Yuura (2003). Case studies to evaluate a domain specific application framework based on complexity and functionality metrics. Information and Software Technology, 45(1), 43-49.
  22. 22. L Etzkorn,W Hughes,C Davis (2001). Automated reusability quality analysis of OO legacy software. Information and Software Technology, 43(5), 295-308.
  23. 23. G Manduchi,C Taliercio (2002). Measuring software evolution at a nuclear fusion experiment site: a test case for the applicability of OO and reuse metrics in software characterization. Information and Software Technology, 44(10), 593-600.
  24. 24. J Bansiya,C Davis (2002). A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(1), 4-17.
  25. 25. G Subramanian,W Corbin (2001). An Empirical Study of Certain Object-Oriented Software Metrics. Journal of Systems and Software, 59(1), 57-63.
  26. 26. K Morris (1989). Metrics for Object-oriented Software Development Environments. Metrics for Object-oriented Software Development Environments
  27. 27. Grady Booch,Michael Vilot (1994). The design of the C++ Booch Components. Proceedings of the European conference on object-oriented programming on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications - OOPSLA/ECOOP '90, 1-11.
  28. 28. R Pressman (2002). Pressman, Roger S. Software Engineering
  29. 29. Chen Lum (1993). A New Metrics for Object-Oriented Design. Information of Software Technology, 35(4), 232-240.
  30. 30. B Abreu,Fernando (1995). The MOOD Metrics Set. Proc. ECOOP'95 Workshop on Metrics
  31. 31. Alexander (2003). Mathematical Assessment of Object-Oriented Design Quality. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(11)
  32. 32. H Lilu,K Zhou,S Yang (2002). Quality metrics of OOD for Software development and Re-development. First Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software
  33. 33. R Subramanyam,M Krishnan (2003). Empirical analysis of CK metrics for object-oriented design complexity: implications for software defects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(4), 297-310.
  34. 34. R Harrison,S Counsell,R Nithi (1998). An evaluation of the MOOD set of OOSM. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 24(6), 67308.
  35. 35. J Eder,G Kappel,M Schreft (1994). Coupling and Cohesion in ObjectOriented Systems. Coupling and Cohesion in ObjectOriented Systems
  36. 36. B Abreu (1995). Design metrics for OO software system. ECOOP"95, Quantitative Methods Workshop
  37. 37. B Abreu,Rita Fernando,G Miguel (1996). Advances in Cryptology — CRYPTO ’96. Proceeding of TOOLS"96 USA
  38. 38. A Kaur,S Singh,K Kahlon (2009). Evaluation and Metrication of Object Oriented System. Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2009, I IMECS 2009
  39. 39. F Brito,E Abreu,W Melo (1996). Evaluating the Impact of Object-Oriented Design on Software Quality. 3rd Int"l S/W Metrics Symposium
  40. 40. S Chidamber,C Kemerer (1994). A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(6), 476-493.
  41. 41. B Dr,M Sastry,Vijaya,Saradhi (2010). Impact of software metrics on Object Oriented Software Development life cycle. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(2), 67-76.
  42. 42. R Subramanyam,M Krishnan (2003). Empirical analysis of CK metrics for object-oriented design complexity: implications for software defects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(4), 297-310.
  43. 43. K Dr,Breesam (2007). Metrics for Object Oriented design focusing on class Inheritance metrics. 2nd International conference on dependability of computer system IEEE
  44. 44. C Neelamegan,Dr Punithavalli (2009). A Survey-Object Oriented quality metrics. Global journal of Computer Sc. And Technology, 9(4)
  45. 45. A Goldberg,D Robson (1983). Smalltalk-80: the language and its implementation. Smalltalk-80: the language and its implementation
  46. 46. M Eliss,B Stroustrup (1990). The annotated C++ Reference manual. The annotated C++ Reference manual
  47. 47. Linda Rosenberg Software Quality Metrics for Object Oriented System Environments. Software Quality Metrics for Object Oriented System Environments
  48. 48. A Brito,E Abreu,; Iseg),Miguel Goulao,Rita Esteves (1993). Towards the Design Quality Evaluation of Object Oriented Software System. Proceedings of 5 th International Conference of Software Quality
  49. 49. A Baroni (2002). Foramal Definition of Object Oriented Design Metrics. Foramal Definition of Object Oriented Design Metrics
  50. 50. Brito Abreu,Rogerio Carapuca (1993). Candidate Metrics for Object -Oriented Software within a Taxonomy Framework. Proceddings of AQUIS"93 (Achieving Quality In Software), 23, 87-96.
  51. 51. S Chidamber,C Kemerer (1994). A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(6), 476-493.
  52. 52. Jie Xu,Danny Ho,Luiz Capretz (2008). An Empirical Validation of Object-Oriented Design Metrics for Fault Prediction. Journal of Computer Science, 4(7), 571-577.
  53. 53. Y Zhou,H Leung (2006). Empirical Analysis of Object-Oriented Design Metrics for Predicting High and Low Severity Faults. IEEE transaction on software engineering, 32(10), 771-789.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Amit Sharma, Dr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey, Prof. (Dr.) Ajay Rana. 1970. "Comparison Study and Review on Object-Oriented Metrics". Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology GJCST Volume 12 (GJCST Volume 12 Issue 7).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Classification
GJCST Classification D.2.0
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
April 4, 2012

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 7.9K
Total Downloads: 686
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Comparison Study and Review on Object-Oriented Metrics

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma Amity university
Dr. Dubey
Dr. Dubey <p>Amity university</p>
Prof. Rana
Prof. Rana <p>Amity university</p>