Computational Analysis of Combustion Chamber Using Cavity-based fuel Injector with Non-Premixed Combustion Model

Computational Analysis of Combustion Chamber Using Cavity-based fuel Injector with Non-Premixed Combustion Model

K.M.Pandey Ph.D

Contact

Dr. Jyoti Prakash Kalita

Contact

A.P.Singh

Contact

α National Institute Of Technology Silchar

Computational Analysis of Combustion Chamber Using Cavity-based fuel Injector with Non-Premixed Combustion Model

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

P4JU6

Computational Analysis of Combustion Chamber Using Cavity-based fuel Injector with Non-Premixed Combustion Model Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This paper presents the supersonic combustion of hydrogen fuel using cavity-based fuel injector with two-dimensional turbulent non-premixed combustion model. The present model is based on the standard k-epsilon (two equations) with standard wall functions which is P1 radiation model and a PDF (Probability Density Function) approach is created. The hydrogen fuel is injected just upstream of the cavity. The Contour of Mass fraction of OH indicates a little amount of OH around 0.001454 after combustion. A cavity flame holder is provided which injects hydrogen fuel in a supersonic hot air stream that facilitates enhanced mixing and combustion efficiency.

References

20 Cites in Article

Reference Format

R Baurle,M Gruber (1998). A study of recessed cavity flowfields for supersonic combustion applications.
A Ben-Yakar,R Hanson (1998). Cavity Flame holders for Ignition and Flame Stabilization in Scramjets: Review and Experimental Study.
D Davis (1996). Numerical Analysis of Two and Three Dimensional Recessed Flame Holders for Scramjet Applications.
J Tishk Off,J Drummond,T Edwards,A Nejad (1997). Future Direction of Supersonic Combustion Research: Air Force/NASA Workshop on Supersonic Combustion.
K.-Y Hsu,L Goss,W Roquemore (1998). Characteristics ofa Trapped-Vortex Combustor.
Viswanath Katta,W Roquemore (1998). Study on Trapped-Vortex Combustor-Effect of Injection on Flow Dynamics.
K Yu,K Wilson,R Smith,K Schadow (1998). Experimental investigation on dual-purpose cavity in supersonic reacting flows.
Tarun Mathur,Mark Gruber,Kevin Jackson,Jeff Donbar,Wayne Donaldson,Thomas Jackson,Fred Billig (2001). Supersonic Combustion Experiments with a Cavity-Based Fuel Injector.
K-Y Hsu,C Carter,J Crafton,M Gruber,J Donbar,T Mathur,D Schommer,W Terry (2000). Fuel distribution about a cavity flameholder in supersonic flow.
M Gruber,R Baurle,T Mathur,K.-Y Hsu (2001). Fundamental Studies of Cavity-Based Flameholder Concepts for Supersonic Combustors.
R Baurle,T Mathur,M Gruber,K Jackson (1998). A numerical and experimental investigation of a scramjet combustor for hypersonic missile applications.
D Eklund,M Gruber (1999). Study of a supersonic combustor employing an aerodynamic ramp pilot injector.
D Eklund,R Baurle,M Gruber (2001). Numerical Study ofa Scramjet Combustor Fuelled by an Aerodynamic Ramp Injector in Dual-Mode Combustion.
Ben Yakar,A Hanson,R (2001). Cavity Flame holders for Ignition and Flame Stabilization in Scramjets: An Overview.
William Allen,Paul King,Mark Gruber,Campbell Carter,Kuang-Yu Hsu (2005). Fuel-Air Injection Effects on Combustion in Cavity-Based Flameholders in a Supersonic Flow.
Jiyuntu (2008). guan Hengyeoh and chaoqunliu.
Wei Huang,Shi-Bin,Mohamed Luo,Lin Pourkashanian,Derek Ma,Jun Ingham,Zhen-Guo Liu,Wang (2010). Numerical Simulations of a Typical Hydrogen Fuelled Scramjet Combustor with a Cavity Flame holder.
Weipeng Li,Taku Nonomura,Akira Oyama,Kozo Fujii (2010). LES Study of Feedback-loop Mechanism of Supersonic Open Cavity Flows.
K Pandey,A Singh (2012). Numerical simulation of combustion chamber without cavity at Mach 3.12.
K Pandey,S Reddy,K (2012). Numerical Simulation of Wall Injection with Cavity in Supersonic Flows of Scramjet Combustion.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

K.M.Pandey. 2012. \u201cComputational Analysis of Combustion Chamber Using Cavity-based fuel Injector with Non-Premixed Combustion Model\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics GJRE-A Volume 12 (GJRE Volume 12 Issue A3): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 12 Issue A3
Pg. 27- 38

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

CFD combustion hydrogen fuel Mach number non-premixed combustion scramjet standard kepsilon turbulence model standard wall functions steady st

Submission ReceivedDecember 10, 2011
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2012
Published January 15, 2012

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 9, 2012

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 108

Country: Unknown

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics

Authors: Dr. Jyoti Prakash Kalita, K.M.Pandey, A.P.Singh (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 232

Total Views (Real + Logic): 5322

Total Downloads (simulated): 2754

Publish Date: 2012 06, Sat

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 59 views
Month 2: 48 views
Month 3: 39 views
Month 4: 41 views
Month 5: 60 views
Month 6: 44 views
Month 7: 52 views
Month 8: 28 views
Month 9: 37 views
Month 10: 40 views
Month 11: 29 views
Month 12: 36 views
Month 13: 35 views
Month 14: 19 views
Month 15: 28 views
Month 16: 44 views
Month 17: 33 views
Month 18: 26 views
Month 19: 32 views
Month 20: 16 views
Month 21: 30 views
Month 22: 20 views
Month 23: 29 views
Month 24: 41 views
Month 25: 25 views
Month 26: 40 views
Month 27: 36 views
Month 28: 29 views
Month 29: 42 views
Month 30: 20 views
Month 31: 31 views
Month 32: 32 views
Month 33: 43 views
Month 34: 41 views
Month 35: 35 views
Month 36: 38 views
Month 37: 24 views
Month 38: 29 views
Month 39: 41 views
Month 40: 33 views
Month 41: 31 views
Month 42: 47 views
Month 43: 36 views
Month 44: 35 views
Month 45: 31 views
Month 46: 29 views
Month 47: 20 views
Month 48: 31 views
Month 49: 25 views
Month 50: 20 views
Month 51: 31 views
Month 52: 30 views
Month 53: 23 views
Month 54: 20 views
Month 55: 38 views
Month 56: 44 views
Month 57: 41 views
Month 58: 43 views
Month 59: 31 views
Month 60: 28 views
Month 61: 24 views
Month 62: 19 views
Month 63: 39 views
Month 64: 33 views
Month 65: 20 views
Month 66: 16 views
Month 67: 23 views
Month 68: 34 views
Month 69: 19 views
Month 70: 11 views
Month 71: 19 views
Month 72: 30 views
Month 73: 44 views
Month 74: 25 views
Month 75: 39 views
Month 76: 29 views
Month 77: 16 views
Month 78: 25 views
Month 79: 34 views
Month 80: 28 views
Month 81: 15 views
Month 82: 18 views
Month 83: 34 views
Month 84: 43 views
Month 85: 22 views
Month 86: 25 views
Month 87: 22 views
Month 88: 21 views
Month 89: 24 views
Month 90: 32 views
Month 91: 40 views
Month 92: 29 views
Month 93: 30 views
Month 94: 17 views
Month 95: 29 views
Month 96: 17 views
Month 97: 30 views
Month 98: 22 views
Month 99: 30 views
Month 100: 28 views
Month 101: 27 views
Month 102: 23 views
Month 103: 19 views
Month 104: 21 views
Month 105: 30 views
Month 106: 34 views
Month 107: 26 views
Month 108: 31 views
Month 109: 16 views
Month 110: 23 views
Month 111: 30 views
Month 112: 27 views
Month 113: 28 views
Month 114: 36 views
Month 115: 37 views
Month 116: 26 views
Month 117: 40 views
Month 118: 10 views
Month 119: 27 views
Month 120: 23 views
Month 121: 28 views
Month 122: 23 views
Month 123: 37 views
Month 124: 26 views
Month 125: 25 views
Month 126: 33 views
Month 127: 19 views
Month 128: 34 views
Month 129: 32 views
Month 130: 30 views
Month 131: 46 views
Month 132: 30 views
Month 133: 36 views
Month 134: 31 views
Month 135: 28 views
Month 136: 27 views
Month 137: 19 views
Month 138: 24 views
Month 139: 34 views
Month 140: 33 views
Month 141: 22 views
Month 142: 19 views
Month 143: 24 views
Month 144: 34 views
Month 145: 33 views
Month 146: 20 views
Month 147: 39 views
Month 148: 41 views
Month 149: 42 views
Month 150: 41 views
Month 151: 31 views
Month 152: 27 views
Month 153: 44 views
Month 154: 26 views
Month 155: 31 views
Month 156: 47 views
Month 157: 31 views
Month 158: 47 views
Month 159: 19 views
Month 160: 43 views
Month 161: 24 views
Month 162: 12 views
Month 163: 56 views
Month 164: 41 views
Month 165: 32 views
Month 166: 29 views
Month 167: 45 views
Month 168: 26 views

Total Views: 5322

Total Downloads: 2754

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]