Contemporary Affirmation of Machine Learning Models for Sensor Validation and Recommendations for Future research Directions

1
Abdo Mahyoub Taher Nasser
Abdo Mahyoub Taher Nasser
2
Dr. V. P. Pawar
Dr. V. P. Pawar
1 School of Computational Science, SRTM University, Nanded, Maharashtra , India

Send Message

To: Author

GJCST Volume 14 Issue E3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTNWS8RA2K

Contemporary Affirmation of Machine Learning Models for Sensor Validation and Recommendations for Future research Directions Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are important and needed systems for the future as the notion “Internet of Things” has emerged lately. They’re used for observation, tracking, or controlling of several uses in sector, health care, home, and military. Yet, the quality of info collected by sensor nodes is changed by anomalies that happen because of various grounds, including node failures, reading errors, unusual events, and malicious assaults. Thus, fault detection is a necessary procedure before it’s used in making selections to make sure the quality of sensor information. A multitude of methods can be called multiple-changeable systems/agents. For example methods such as for example creating heating system, ventilation and air conditioner(HVAC) methods are changeable methods / agents . Multiple-changeable methods /agents such as for instance these commonly don’t meet performance expectations imagined at design time. Such failings can be a result of a number of factors, for example difficulties due to improper installment, substandard maintenance, or products failure. These issues, or “faults,” can comprise mechanical disappointments, management difficulties, design mistakes, and improper operator treatment.

26 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Matt Smith,Charles Castello,Joshua New (2013). Sensor Validation with Machine Learning.
  2. Michael Osborne,Roman Garnetty,Kevin Swerskyz,Nando De Freitas (2011). Machine Learning in Game Playing: A Workshop at the 16th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-99).
  3. L Eciolaza,M Alkarouri,N Lawrence,V Kadirkamanathan,P Fleming (2007). Gaussian Process Latent Variable Models for Fault Detection.
  4. R Garnett,M Osborne,S Reece,A Rogers,S Roberts (2010). Sequential Bayesian Prediction in the Presence of Changepoints and Faults.
  5. Y Guo,J Wall,J Li,S West (2011). A Machine Learning Approach for Fault Detection in Multi-variable Systems.
  6. M Piette,S Kinney,P Haves (2001). Analysis of an information monitoring and diagnostic system to improve building operations.
  7. Massieh Najafi,Auslander,David,Bartlett,Peter,Philip Haves Application of machine learning in fault diagnostics of mechanical systems.
  8. D Westphalen,K Roth (2003). Saline zu Werl in Westphalen..
  9. G Kaler (1988). Expert system predicts service.
  10. Young-Hak Song,Yasunori Akashi,Jurng-Jae Yee (2008). A development of easy-to-use tool for fault detection and diagnosis in building air-conditioning systems.
  11. T Rossi,J Braun A statistical, rulebased fault detection and diagnostic method for vapor compression air conditioners.
  12. Philip Haves,Timothy Salsbury,Jonathan Wright (1996). Condition monitoring in HVAC subsystems using first principles models.
  13. Satyam Bendapudi,James Braun,Groll,A Eckhard (2005). Dynamic model of a centrifugal chiller system -Model development, numerical study, and validation.
  14. Henk Peitsman,Bakker,E Vincent (1996). Application of black-box models to HVAC systems for fault detection.
  15. Massieh Najafi,David Auslander,Peter Bartlett,Philip Haves,Michael Sohn (2008). Application of machine learning in the fault diagnostics of air handling units.
  16. L Riascos,M Simoes,P Miyagi (2007). A Bayesian network fault diagnostic system for proton exchange membrane fuel cells.
  17. U Lerner,B Moses,M Scott,S Mcilraith,D Koller (2002). Monitoring a complex physical system using a hybrid dynamic Bayes net.
  18. C Chien,S Chen,Y Lin (2202). Using Bayesian network for fault detection on distribution feeder.
  19. Ehsan Ullah Warriach,Marco Aiello,Kenji Te (2012). A Machine Learning Approach for Identifying and Classifying Faults in Wireless Sensor Networks.
  20. C Warrender,S Forrest,B Pearlmutter,C Sung-Bae,H Sang-Jun (2003). Detecting Intrusions Using System Calls: Alternative.
  21. S Jha,K Tan,R Maxion (null). Markov chains, classifiers, and intrusion detection.
  22. C Kruegel,G Vigna Anomaly detection of webbased attacks.
  23. N Ye,Y Zhang,C Borror (2004). Robustness of the Markov-Chain Model for Cyber-Attack Detection.
  24. Padhraic Smyth (1994). Hidden Markov models for fault detection in dynamic systems.
  25. R Khanna,H Liu (2008). Control theoretic Approach to Intrusion detection using a Distributed Hidden Markov model.
  26. S West,Y Guo,X Wang (2011). Automated Fault Detection And Diagnosis Of HVAC Subsystems Using Statistical Machine Learning.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Abdo Mahyoub Taher Nasser. 2014. \u201cContemporary Affirmation of Machine Learning Models for Sensor Validation and Recommendations for Future research Directions\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - E: Network, Web & Security GJCST-E Volume 14 (GJCST Volume 14 Issue E3): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 21, 2014

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 9065
Total Downloads: 2465
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are important and needed systems for the future as the notion “Internet of Things” has emerged lately. They’re used for observation, tracking, or controlling of several uses in sector, health care, home, and military. Yet, the quality of info collected by sensor nodes is changed by anomalies that happen because of various grounds, including node failures, reading errors, unusual events, and malicious assaults. Thus, fault detection is a necessary procedure before it’s used in making selections to make sure the quality of sensor information. A multitude of methods can be called multiple-changeable systems/agents. For example methods such as for example creating heating system, ventilation and air conditioner(HVAC) methods are changeable methods / agents . Multiple-changeable methods /agents such as for instance these commonly don’t meet performance expectations imagined at design time. Such failings can be a result of a number of factors, for example difficulties due to improper installment, substandard maintenance, or products failure. These issues, or “faults,” can comprise mechanical disappointments, management difficulties, design mistakes, and improper operator treatment.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Contemporary Affirmation of Machine Learning Models for Sensor Validation and Recommendations for Future research Directions

Abdo Mahyoub Taher Nasser
Abdo Mahyoub Taher Nasser School of Computational Science, SRTM University, Nanded, Maharashtra , India
Dr. V. P. Pawar
Dr. V. P. Pawar

Research Journals