Loading menu…

Continuous Improvement in Business Process Re-Engineering & Six Sigma

Shyam Lal Sharma
Shyam Lal Sharma * § PhD., M.Tech.( Mechine Design ) , B.Tech.( Machanical Engineering )
§ Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University

Send Message

To: Author

Continuous Improvement in Business Process Re-Engineering & Six Sigma

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CWQ45

Continuous Improvement in Business Process Re-Engineering & Six Sigma Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

In this paper the author predicts that the overwhelming majority of BPR initiatives now underway, or starting in the next year, will fail to achieve their intended result. With reference to his seven axioms of economic-quality he explains why and offers recommendations to guide better practice based on people practices; knowledge; systemic understanding and an appreciation of the importance of variation. The BPR method is defined by Hammer and Champy as “the fundamental reconsideration and radical redesign of organizational processes, in order to achieve drastic improvement of current performance in cost, service and speed”. At it’s turn, the Kaizen method is an management concept for incremental change. The key elements of Kaizen are quality, effort, involvement of all employees, willingness to change and communication. When BPR is compared with Kaizen method, the BPR is harder to implement, technology – oriented, enables radical change. On the other hand, Kaizen method is easier to implement, is more people – oriented and requires long term discipline.

References

20 Cites in Article
  1. 1. Anders Berger (1997). Continuous improvement and kaizen: standardization and organizational designs. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 8(2), 110-117.
  2. 2. A. Brunet,S. New (2003). Kaizen in Japan: an empirical study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(12), 1426-1446.
  3. 3. L. Carpinetti,T. Buosi,M. Gerolamo (2003). Quality Management and improvement. A framework and a business-process reference model. Business Process Management Journal, 9(4), 543-554.
  4. 4. J. Dahlgaard,S. Dahlgaard-Park (2006). Lean production, six sigma quality, TQM and company culture. The TQM Magazine, 18(3), 263-281.
  5. 5. T. Davenport,J. Short (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 11-27.
  6. 6. T. Davenport (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering work through information technology.
  7. 7. R. Elbo (2000). Inside’s Japan Kaizen Power Houses. Business World Philippines, 13, 1-2.
  8. 8. C. Farley (1999). Despliegue de Políticas del KAIZEN. XI Congreso Internacional de Calidad Total
  9. 9. S. Gondhalekar,S. Babu,N. Godrej (1995). Towards TQM using kaizen process dynamics: a case study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 12(9), 192-209.
  10. 10. M. Imai (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japan's Competitive Success, NY: Random House.
  11. 11. M. ImaI (1997). Gemba Kaizen. A Commonsense, Low-Cost Approach to Management. A common sense
  12. 12. J. Juran (1990). Juran y el Liderazgo para la Calidad. Un Manual para Directivos. Un Manual para Directivos. Madrid: Editorial Díaz Santos
  13. 13. P. Lillrank,N. Kano (1989). Continuous Improvement: Quality Control Circles in Japanese industries.
  14. 14. Henry Mintzberg,Frances Westley (1992). Cycles of organizational change. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 39-59.
  15. 15. D. Newitt (1996). Beyond BPR and TQM - managing through processes: is Kaizen enough?.
  16. 16. Andrew Pettigrew (1990). Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-292.
  17. 17. A. Robinson (1991). Continuous Improvement in Operations. Cambridge
  18. 18. J. Sheridan (1997). Kaizen Blitz. Industry Week, 246(16), 16.
  19. 19. Cheryl Tanner,Ron Roncarti (1994). Kaizen leads to breakthroughs in responsiveness—and the shingo prize—at critikon. National Productivity Review, 13(4), 517-531.
  20. 20. Andrew Van de Ven,Marshall Poole (1995). Explaining Developments change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510-540.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Shyam Lal Sharma Lal Sharma, Kamlesh Kumari. 2026. "Continuous Improvement in Business Process Re-Engineering & Six Sigma". Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics GJRE-A Volume 16 (GJRE Volume 16 Issue 14 (A2)).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords
Classification
GJRE-A Classification FOR Code: 091399p
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
June 20, 2016

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 199K
Total Downloads: 757
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Continuous Improvement in Business Process Re-Engineering & Six Sigma

Shyam Lal Sharma Sharma
Shyam Lal Sharma Sharma