Correlation of Lymph Node Density and Recurrence in Carcinoma Penis: A Perspective on Optimal Management and Unmet Needs from a Tertiary Care Centre

Introduction: Penile carcinoma is a devastating urological neoplasm in which the most assertive prognostic variable is the presence of lymph node involvement. Multiple studies in the current literature have shown that the number of positive lymph nodes predict recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The objective of this present retrospective analysis is to authenticate the use of LND as a predictor of RFS and OS after ILND. Methods: Our institutional penile cancer database was analyzed for patients who underwent ILND from January 2000 to May 2008. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method to determine RFS and OS. Two-sided p values

References

29 Cites in Article

Reference Format

A Ornellas,Seixas De Moraes,J (1991). Analyses of 200 lymphadenectomies in patients with penile carcinoma.
R Ravi (1993). Correlation between the Extent of Nodal Involvement and Survival following Groin Dissection for Carcinoma of the Penis.
Y Zhu,Ye Yao,X Zhang,S Dai,B Zhang,H (2011). New Nstaging system of penile cancer provides a better reflection of prognosis.
(2009). UICC. TNM-Classification of Malignant Tumours.
Giorgio Pizzocaro,Ferran Algaba,Simon Horenblas,Eduard Solsona,Silvia Tana,Hein Van Der Poel,Nicholas Watkin (2010). EAU Penile Cancer Guidelines 2009.
Robert Svatek,Mark Munsell,Jordan Kincaid,Paul Hegarty,Joel Slaton,J Busby,Kris Gaston,Philippe Spiess,Lance Pagliaro,Pheroze Tamboli,Curtis Pettaway (2009). Association Between Lymph Node Density and Disease Specific Survival in Patients With Penile Cancer.
Jian-Ye Liu,Yong-Hong Li,Zhi-Ling Zhang,Kai Yao,Yun-Lin Ye,Dan Xie,Hui Han,Zhou-Wei Liu,Zi-Ke Qin,Fang-Jian Zhou (2013). The risk factors for the presence of pelvic lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma patients with inguinal lymph node dissection.
Yao Zhu,Cheng-Yuan Gu,Ding-Wei Ye (2014). Population-Based Assessment of the Number of Lymph Nodes Removed in the Treatment of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
John Stein,Jie Cai,Susan Groshen,Donald Skinner (2003). Risk Factors for Patients With Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases Following Radical Cystectomy With En Bloc Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: The Concept of Lymph Node Density.
Wassim Kassouf,Dan Leibovici,Mark Munsell,Colin Dinney,H Grossman,Ashish Kamat (2006). Evaluation of the Relevance of Lymph Node Density in a Contemporary Series of Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.
Li Yao,K Chen,P Zou,Z,Qin Liu,Z (2014). Diseasespecific survival after radical lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: prediction by lymph node count and density.
Giovanni Lughezzani,Mario Catanzaro,Tullio Torelli,Luigi Piva,Davide Biasoni,Silvia Stagni,Andrea Necchi,Patrizia Giannatempo,Daniele Raggi,Elena Fare',Maurizio Colecchia,Giorgio Pizzocaro,Roberto Salvioni,Nicola Nicolai (2015). Relationship between lymph node ratio and cancer‐specific survival in a contemporary series of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastases.
R Svatek,M Munsell,Kincaid Hegarty,P Slaton,J Busby,J (2009). Association between lymph node density and disease specific survival in patients with penile cancer.
Y Zhu,C Gu,D Ye (2013). Validation of the prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma: a populationbased study.
Madhu Mazumdar,Jill Glassman (2000). Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision‐making about cancer treatments.
Jun Kasuga,Takashi Kawahara,Daiji Takamoto,Sachi Fukui,Takashi Tokita,Tomoyuki Tadenuma,Masaki Narahara,Syusei Fusayasu,Hideyuki Terao,Koji Izumi,Hiroki Ito,Yusuke Hattori,Jun-Ichi Teranishi,Takeshi Sasaki,Kazuhide Makiyama,Yasuhide Miyoshi,Masahiro Yao,Yasushi Yumura,Hiroshi Miyamoto,Hiroji Uemura (2016). Increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with disease-specific mortality in patients with penile cancer.
Joost Leijte,Maarten Gallee,Ninja Antonini,Simon Horenblas (2008). Evaluation of Current TNM Classification of Penile Carcinoma.
Durgatosh Pandey,Vikash Mahajan,R Kannan (2006). Prognostic factors in node-positive carcinoma of the penis.
C Protzel,A Alcaraz,S Horenblas,G Pizzocaro,A Zlotta,O Hakenberg (2009). Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.
Durgatosh Pandey,Vikash Mahajan,R Kannan (2006). Prognostic factors in node-positive carcinoma of the penis.
Wassim Kassouf,Dan Leibovici,Mark Munsell,Colin Dinney,H Grossman,Ashish Kamat (2006). Evaluation of the Relevance of Lymph Node Density in a Contemporary Series of Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.
Ganesh Palapattu,Mohamad Allaf,Bruce Trock,Jonathan Epstein,Patrick Walsh (2004). PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN PROGRESSION IN MEN WITH LYMPH NODE METASTASES FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RESULTS OF LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP.
J Stein,J Cai,S Groshen,D Skinner (2003). Risk factors for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases following radical cystectomy with en bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy: concept of lymph node density.
Johnson Hsiao,W,Delman,Jani Brawley,O Master,V (2010). Extensive inguinal lymphadenectomy improves overall 5-year survival in penile cancer patients: results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program.
Oliver Hakenberg,Eva Compérat,Suks Minhas,Andrea Necchi,Chris Protzel,Nick Watkin (2015). EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer: 2014 Update.
Giorgio Pizzocaro,Nicola Nicolai,Angelo Milani (2009). Taxanes in Combination with Cisplatin and Fluorouracil for Advanced Penile Cancer: Preliminary Results.
Edouard Trabulsi,Jean Hoffman-Censits (2010). Chemotherapy for Penile and Urethral Carcinoma.
Lance Pagliaro,Dallas Williams,Danai Daliani,Michael Williams,William Osai,Michael Kincaid,Sijin Wen,Peter Thall,Curtis Pettaway (2010). Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Metastatic Penile Cancer: A Phase II Study.
Fig (null). Fig. 1. Overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with stage IIB–IIIB ovarian cancer (Kaplan–Meier method).

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Yashasvi Singh. 2018. \u201cCorrelation of Lymph Node Density and Recurrence in Carcinoma Penis: A Perspective on Optimal Management and Unmet Needs from a Tertiary Care Centre\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - K: Interdisciplinary GJMR-K Volume 18 (GJMR Volume 18 Issue K7): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJMR Volume 18 Issue K7
Pg. 17- 23

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMR-K Classification: NLMC Code: WJ 140

Submission ReceivedDecember 13, 2017
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2018
Published January 15, 2018

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 20, 2018

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 125

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research - K: Interdisciplinary

Authors: Rajeev T.P, Sasanka Kumar Barua, Yashasvi Singh, Debanga Sarma, Saumar Jyoti Baruah, Puskal Kumar Bagchi, Dr. Dijesh Damodaran, Pranab kumar kaman, Dr. Manash Pratim Kashyap, Dr. Dijesh Damodaran (PhD/Dr. count: 3)

View Count (all-time): 107

Total Views (Real + Logic): 2879

Total Downloads (simulated): 1527

Publish Date: 2018 12, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 39 views
Month 2: 43 views
Month 3: 46 views
Month 4: 56 views
Month 5: 54 views
Month 6: 39 views
Month 7: 29 views
Month 8: 37 views
Month 9: 46 views
Month 10: 35 views
Month 11: 31 views
Month 12: 33 views
Month 13: 40 views
Month 14: 19 views
Month 15: 41 views
Month 16: 28 views
Month 17: 36 views
Month 18: 33 views
Month 19: 29 views
Month 20: 40 views
Month 21: 23 views
Month 22: 21 views
Month 23: 25 views
Month 24: 42 views
Month 25: 31 views
Month 26: 38 views
Month 27: 25 views
Month 28: 28 views
Month 29: 40 views
Month 30: 20 views
Month 31: 42 views
Month 32: 12 views
Month 33: 31 views
Month 34: 36 views
Month 35: 41 views
Month 36: 33 views
Month 37: 32 views
Month 38: 27 views
Month 39: 37 views
Month 40: 46 views
Month 41: 27 views
Month 42: 35 views
Month 43: 34 views
Month 44: 36 views
Month 45: 39 views
Month 46: 36 views
Month 47: 26 views
Month 48: 40 views
Month 49: 31 views
Month 50: 28 views
Month 51: 19 views
Month 52: 34 views
Month 53: 27 views
Month 54: 45 views
Month 55: 31 views
Month 56: 38 views
Month 57: 30 views
Month 58: 34 views
Month 59: 31 views
Month 60: 27 views
Month 61: 28 views
Month 62: 29 views
Month 63: 23 views
Month 64: 18 views
Month 65: 36 views
Month 66: 18 views
Month 67: 37 views
Month 68: 30 views
Month 69: 22 views
Month 70: 24 views
Month 71: 25 views
Month 72: 34 views
Month 73: 13 views
Month 74: 19 views
Month 75: 27 views
Month 76: 26 views
Month 77: 41 views
Month 78: 22 views
Month 79: 23 views
Month 80: 25 views
Month 81: 31 views
Month 82: 28 views
Month 83: 43 views
Month 84: 31 views
Month 85: 26 views
Month 86: 43 views
Month 87: 26 views
Month 88: 19 views

Total Views: 2879

Total Downloads: 1527

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]