Cost Hierarchy: Evidence and Implications

1
Rajiv D. Banker
Rajiv D. Banker
2
Gordon S. Potter
Gordon S. Potter
3
Dhinu Srinivasan
Dhinu Srinivasan
1 University of Pittsburgh

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 21 Issue D2

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

HSYU2

Cost Hierarchy: Evidence and Implications Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Empirical evidence on the association between overhead costs and non-volume related cost drivers is mixed. Anderson and Sedatole (2013) offer possible explanations for the lack of evidence and find that the cost hierarchy is descriptive of the association between resource consumption and production activity. In this paper, we provide evidence on the presence of the cost hierarchy by studying the behavior of indirect production labor costs using daily data for five years from seven production departments of an industrial equipment manufacturer. We find that in addition to direct labor costs, the number of setups and number of distinct parts are also significantly associated with indirect production costs in at least six out of the seven production departments. Interestingly, despite our evidence for the existence of the cost hierarchy, the simple method of estimating these indirect costs as a proportion of only direct labor costs performs remarkably well in predicting costs.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Rajiv D. Banker. 2022. \u201cCost Hierarchy: Evidence and Implications\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - D: Accounting & Auditing GJMBR-D Volume 21 (GJMBR Volume 21 Issue D2): .

Download Citation

Alt text: Academic article on cost hierarchy evidence and implications in management research.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-D Classification: JEL Code: M49
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 10, 2022

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1736
Total Downloads: 837
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Empirical evidence on the association between overhead costs and non-volume related cost drivers is mixed. Anderson and Sedatole (2013) offer possible explanations for the lack of evidence and find that the cost hierarchy is descriptive of the association between resource consumption and production activity. In this paper, we provide evidence on the presence of the cost hierarchy by studying the behavior of indirect production labor costs using daily data for five years from seven production departments of an industrial equipment manufacturer. We find that in addition to direct labor costs, the number of setups and number of distinct parts are also significantly associated with indirect production costs in at least six out of the seven production departments. Interestingly, despite our evidence for the existence of the cost hierarchy, the simple method of estimating these indirect costs as a proportion of only direct labor costs performs remarkably well in predicting costs.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Cost Hierarchy: Evidence and Implications

Rajiv D. Banker
Rajiv D. Banker University of Pittsburgh
Gordon S. Potter
Gordon S. Potter
Dhinu Srinivasan
Dhinu Srinivasan

Research Journals