Article Fingerprint
ReserarchID
X422L
Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre
Print ISSN 0975-5861
e-ISSN 2249-4596
Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.
Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.
This paper attempted to assess the attitudes of students in
Advances in technology have created the potential for a new
Inclusion has become a priority on the global educational agenda,
While the limit equilibrium and finite element methods have been used by the engineers for a variety of slope stability problems for many years, the use of limit analysis has started to attract the attentions of engineers and researchers in recent years. In this paper, the differences between these three major methods will be studied in terms of factors of safety and the locations of critical failure surfaces. From the study, it is found that even with the use of recent versions of finite element or limit analysis programs, surprising and unreasonable results can still be found frequently, and the use of the classical limit equilibrium appears to be robust over various difficult problems with relatively complex geologic conditions. On the other hand, the differences between the three methods can be considered as small for normal problems.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
