Cross Validation can Cause a Difference of Misinterpretation to Valid Interpretation

Vipin Upadhyay

Cross Validation can Cause a Difference of Misinterpretation to Valid Interpretation

Vipin Upadhyay * §

Contact

§ Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun

Cross Validation can Cause a Difference of Misinterpretation to Valid Interpretation

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

QUHUE

Cross Validation can Cause a Difference of Misinterpretation to Valid Interpretation Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Easy availability of remote sensing dataset increases its importance and use by multiple folds, especially in areas of rough and difficult terrain like snow bound mountains. But at the same chances of misinterpretations will also be increased in the same proportion, when dealing with high altitude mountains in remote sensing. Seasonal variation within single year time framework and temporal changes in long time are more important to understand separately. Verification of the imagery selection, operations and findings is the key of analysis. This paper focused upon misinterpretation often occurs in the geospatial domain by shifting the focus, when observations transforming to information. A negligible error in selection of imagery, operation or perception make it possible to misinterpret the findings. In this study we are try to withdrawing kind attention of users toward small-small negligence, that cost a lot. In this study we take area under Nanda Devi national Park as an example to highlight such errors.

References

29 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Helen Couclelis (1992). Conceptual Models of Error and Uncertainty.
Helen Couclelis (2003). The Certainty of Uncertainty: GIS and the Limits of Geographic Knowledge.
P Deer (1999). Digital Change Detection Techniques: Civilian and Military Application Published in the UK.
F Dretske (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information.
R Gareth,I Brown,M Kari,V Tarmo,W Ben (2002). How Can the Dynamics of the Tundra-Taiga Boundary Be Remotely Monitored.
J Gong,H Sui,M Guoruia,Q Zhou (2008). A Review of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Data Change Detection Algorithms.
K Ichii,A Kawabata,Y Yamaguchi (2002). Global correlation analysis for NDVI and climatic variables and NDVI trends: 1982-1990.
Jeremy Kerr,Marsha Ostrovsky (2003). From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing.
J Kerr,M Ostrovsky (2003). From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing.
K Lee (1991). Closure report for decontamination and decommissioning (D and D) category, Corrective Action Unit 95, EPA Farm Laboratory Building 15-06, Nevada Test Site.
P Leonardo,G Franceisco,A Jose,Sobrino,C Juan,M Jimenez,K Haydee (2006). Radiometric correction effects in lands at multidate/multi-sensor change detection studies.
Li Deren (2010). Remotely sensed images and GIS data fusion for automatic change detection.
T M Lillesand,R Kiefer (1987). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation.
D Lu,P Mausel,E Brondizio,E Moran (2004). Change detection techniques.
R Lunette,R Congalton,F Lynn,R John,K Mcgwire,L Tinnery (1991). Remote sensing and geographic information systems: Error sources and research issues.
J Lyon,D Yuan,R Lunetta,C Elvidge (1998). A Change Detection Experiment Using Vegetation Indices.
R Manonmani,G Mary,D Suganya (2010). Remote Sensing and GIS Application in Change Detection Study in Urban Zone Using Multi Temporal Satellite.
L Martin,P Howarth (1989). Change-detection accuracy assessment using SPOT multispectral imagery of the rural-urban fringe☆.
P Mumby,A Edwards (2002). Mapping marine environments with IKONOS imagery: enhanced spatial resolution can deliver greater thematic accuracy.
P Mumby,A Harborne (1999). Development of a systematic classification scheme of marine habitats to facilitate regional management and mapping of Caribbean coral reefs.
Johannes Oerlemans (1994). Quantifying Global Warming from the Retreat of Glaciers.
S Ozesmi,M Bauer (2002). Satellite remote sensing of wetlands.
J Paruelo,W Lauenroth (1998). Interannual variability of NDVI and its relationship to climate for North American shrub lands and grasslands.
C Ricotta,G Avena (2000). The remote sensing approach in broad‐scale phenological studies.
A Singh (1989). Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data.
B Tobias,U Kamp (2008). Glacier Mapping in High Mountains Using DEMs Landsat and ASTER Data.
Woody Turner,Sacha Spector,Ned Gardiner,Matthew Fladeland,Eleanor Sterling,Marc Steininger (2003). Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation.
H Veregin (1989). Accuracy of spatial Databases: Annotated Bibliography. National Center for geographic information and Analysis.
W Zhou,T Austin,G Morgan (2008). Objectbased Land Cover Classification and Change Analysis in the Baltimore Metropolitan Area Using Multitemporal High Resolution Remote Sensing Data.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Vipin Upadhyay. 2016. "Cross Validation can Cause a Difference of Misinterpretation to Valid Interpretation". Global Journal of Human-Social Science - B: Geography, Environmental Science & Disaster Management GJHSS-B Volume 16 (GJHSS Volume 16 Issue B4).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJHSS Volume 16 Issue B4

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJHSS-B Classification FOR Code: 969999

Submission ReceivedDecember 11, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2016
Published January 15, 2016

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 25, 2016

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science

Authors: Vipin Upadhyay, B. S. Adhikari (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 336

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1786

Total Downloads (simulated): 108

Publish Date: 2016 01, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 32 views
Month 2: 40 views
Month 3: 52 views
Month 4: 62 views
Month 5: 28 views
Month 6: 35 views
Month 7: 45 views
Month 8: 43 views
Month 9: 34 views
Month 10: 27 views
Month 11: 33 views
Month 12: 32 views
Month 13: 39 views
Month 14: 49 views
Month 15: 19 views
Month 16: 27 views
Month 17: 30 views
Month 18: 33 views
Month 19: 31 views
Month 20: 36 views
Month 21: 23 views
Month 22: 43 views
Month 23: 31 views
Month 24: 44 views
Month 25: 41 views
Month 26: 36 views
Month 27: 28 views
Month 28: 36 views
Month 29: 34 views
Month 30: 21 views
Month 31: 40 views
Month 32: 42 views
Month 33: 25 views
Month 34: 33 views
Month 35: 19 views
Month 36: 46 views
Month 37: 42 views
Month 38: 34 views
Month 39: 25 views
Month 40: 27 views
Month 41: 30 views
Month 42: 28 views
Month 43: 41 views
Month 44: 19 views
Month 45: 39 views
Month 46: 26 views
Month 47: 25 views
Month 48: 24 views
Month 49: 50 views
Month 50: 32 views
Month 51: 38 views
Month 52: 43 views
Month 53: 33 views
Month 54: 19 views
Month 55: 24 views
Month 56: 29 views
Month 57: 27 views
Month 58: 35 views
Month 59: 23 views
Month 60: 17 views
Month 61: 23 views
Month 62: 35 views
Month 63: 25 views
Month 64: 22 views
Month 65: 29 views
Month 66: 27 views
Month 67: 21 views
Month 68: 28 views
Month 69: 22 views
Month 70: 37 views
Month 71: 31 views
Month 72: 15 views
Month 73: 26 views
Month 74: 26 views
Month 75: 16 views
Month 76: 34 views
Month 77: 14 views
Month 78: 29 views
Month 79: 35 views
Month 80: 23 views
Month 81: 17 views
Month 82: 30 views
Month 83: 27 views
Month 84: 40 views
Month 85: 35 views
Month 86: 13 views
Month 87: 22 views
Month 88: 28 views
Month 89: 32 views
Month 90: 25 views
Month 91: 29 views
Month 92: 39 views
Month 93: 45 views
Month 94: 38 views
Month 95: 12 views
Month 96: 38 views
Month 97: 40 views
Month 98: 36 views
Month 99: 30 views
Month 100: 17 views
Month 101: 28 views
Month 102: 31 views
Month 103: 30 views
Month 104: 13 views
Month 105: 18 views
Month 106: 40 views
Month 107: 38 views
Month 108: 39 views
Month 109: 38 views
Month 110: 33 views
Month 111: 21 views
Month 112: 34 views
Month 113: 16 views
Month 114: 61 views
Month 115: 55 views
Month 116: 49 views
Month 117: 48 views
Month 118: 47 views
Month 119: 25 views
Month 120: 28 views
Month 121: 32 views
Month 122: 16 views
Month 123: 24 views
Month 124: 35 views
Month 125: 19 views
Month 126: 41 views
Month 127: 45 views
Month 128: 47 views
Month 129: 17 views

Total Views: 1.8K

Total Downloads: 108

All Trends