Customer Satisfaction and Intellectual Property Protection: In the Case of Online Educational Institutions

1
Dr. Ali Dehghan
Dr. Ali Dehghan
1 Wesleyan College

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 12 Issue B21

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

ZLUZ6

Customer Satisfaction and Intellectual Property Protection: In the Case of Online Educational Institutions Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The present study attempts to contribute to the knowledge of how intellectual property protection can improve student satisfaction in online courses? After the comprehensive literature review and demonstration of online student satisfaction concepts, the paper has reduced, classified and compared the data. The results reflects that the intellectual property protection is one of the latent factors in online student satisfaction assessment and this study should be enhanced by doing a descriptive research in a larger scale.

25 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Shirley Alexander (2001). E‐learning developments and experiences.
  2. J Arbaugh (2000). Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Courses.
  3. A Astin (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years received.
  4. A Bates (1997). Recruiting the university for technological change.
  5. D Bolliger,T Martindale (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses.
  6. A Carr-Chellman,P Duchastel (2000). The Ideal Online Course.
  7. J Daniel (1997). Why universities need technology strategies.
  8. Ali Dehghan,John Dugger,David Dobrzykowski,Anne Balazs (2009). The antecedents of student loyalty in online programs.
  9. Daniel Eastmond (1995). Adult distance study through computer conferencing.
  10. D Eastmond Alone But Together: Adult Distance Study Through Computer Conferencing.
  11. M Endres,S Chowdhury,C Frye,C Hurtubis (2009). The Multifaceted Nature of Online MBA Student Satisfaction and Impacts on Behavioral Intentions.
  12. Thavamalar Govindasamy (2002). Successful implementation of e-Learning.
  13. T Irani (1998). Communication potential, information richness and attitude: A study of computer mediated communication in the ALN classroom.
  14. Brent Muirhead,J Skelton (1996). College Writing Rubrics.
  15. S Johnson,S Aragon,N Shaik,N Palma-Rivas (2000). Comparative Analysis of Learner Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face Learning Environments.
  16. D Johnstone (1992). Learning Productivity: a New Imperative for American Higher Education.
  17. J Keller (1983). Motivational design of instruction.
  18. S Levy,A Hancock (2003). Six Factors to Consider when Planning Online Distance Learning Programs in Higher Education.
  19. Yair Levy (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses.
  20. M Moore,G Kearsley (1996). Distance education: A systems view.
  21. E Nesset,Helgesen (2009). Modelling and Managing Student Loyalty: A Study of a Norwegian University College.
  22. Alexander Romiszowski,E Chang (1992). Hypertext’s Contribution to Computer-Mediated Communication: In Search of an Instructional Model.
  23. Karen Swan (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses.
  24. C Twigg (2000). Who Owns Online Courses and Course Materials? Intellectual Property Policies for a New Learning Environment.
  25. Dongsong Zhang,J Zhao,Lina Zhou,Jay Nunamaker (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning?.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Dr. Ali Dehghan. 1970. \u201cCustomer Satisfaction and Intellectual Property Protection: In the Case of Online Educational Institutions\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - B: Economic & Commerce GJMBR-B Volume 12 (GJMBR Volume 12 Issue B21): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 12 Issue B21
Pg. 61- 65
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 20797
Total Downloads: 10975
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

The present study attempts to contribute to the knowledge of how intellectual property protection can improve student satisfaction in online courses? After the comprehensive literature review and demonstration of online student satisfaction concepts, the paper has reduced, classified and compared the data. The results reflects that the intellectual property protection is one of the latent factors in online student satisfaction assessment and this study should be enhanced by doing a descriptive research in a larger scale.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Customer Satisfaction and Intellectual Property Protection: In the Case of Online Educational Institutions

Dr. Ali Dehghan
Dr. Ali Dehghan Wesleyan College

Research Journals