Data Mining Approach to Prediction of Going Concern Using Classification and Regression Tree (CART)

1
dr._mahdi_salehi
dr._mahdi_salehi
2
Dr. Mahdi Salehi
Dr. Mahdi Salehi
3
Fezeh Zahedi Fard
Fezeh Zahedi Fard
1 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 13 Issue D3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

TI54T

Data Mining Approach to Prediction of Going Concern Using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This paper has employed a data mining approach for Going Concern Prediction (GCP) for one year ahead and has applied Classification and Regression Tree (CART) and NaΓ―ve Bayes Bayesian Network (NBBN) based on feature selection method in Iranian firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). For this purpose, at the first step, using the Stepwise Discriminant Analysis (SDA) has opted the final variables from among of 42 variables and in the next stage, has applied 10-fold cross-validation to figure out the optimal model. McNemar test signifies that there is a significant difference between the two models in terms of prediction accuracy and CART model is able to predict going concern more accurately. The CART model reached 99.92 and 98.62 percent accuracy rates so as to training and holdout data.

17 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Aicpa (1998). Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits.
  2. S Ashoori,S Mohammadi (2011). Compare failure prediction models based on feature selection technique: empirical case from Iran.
  3. Anthony Brabazon,Peter Keenan (2004). A hybrid genetic model for the prediction of corporate failure.
  4. L Breiman,J Friedman,R Olshen,C Stone (1984). Classification and regression trees.
  5. Thomas Kida (1980). An Investigation into Auditors' Continuity and Related Qualification Judgments.
  6. H Koh (1987). Prediction of going-concern status: A probit model for the auditors.
  7. H Koh,R Brown (1991). Probit prediction of going and non-going concerns.
  8. H Koh,L Killough (1988). The Auditor's Consideration of an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.
  9. H Koh,C Kee Low (2004). Going concern prediction using data mining techniques.
  10. Hui Li,Jie Sun,Jian Wu (2010). Predicting business failure using classification and regression tree: An empirical comparison with popular classical statistical methods and top classification mining methods.
  11. Z Markov (2007). Probabilistic reasoning with naΓ―ve bayes and Bayesian networks.
  12. David Martens,Liesbeth Bruynseels,Bart Baesens,Marleen Willekens,Jan Vanthienen (2008). Predicting going concern opinion with data mining.
  13. T Mckee (1976). Discriminant prediction of going concern status: A model for auditors.
  14. K Menon,K Schwartz (1987). An empirical investigation of audit qualification decisions in the presence of going concern uncertainties.
  15. F Mokhatab Rafiei,S Manzari,S Bostanian (2011). Financial health prediction models using artificial neural networks, genetic algorithm and multivariate discriminant analysis: Iranian evidence.
  16. S Soni (2010). Author Index - Volume 2.
  17. Lili Sun,Prakash Shenoy (2007). Using Bayesian networks for bankruptcy prediction: Some methodological issues.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

dr._mahdi_salehi. 2013. \u201cData Mining Approach to Prediction of Going Concern Using Classification and Regression Tree (CART)\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - D: Accounting & Auditing GJMBR-D Volume 13 (GJMBR Volume 13 Issue D3): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 13 Issue D3
Pg. 25- 30
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

April 23, 2013

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 5052
Total Downloads: 2566
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

This paper has employed a data mining approach for Going Concern Prediction (GCP) for one year ahead and has applied Classification and Regression Tree (CART) and NaΓ―ve Bayes Bayesian Network (NBBN) based on feature selection method in Iranian firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). For this purpose, at the first step, using the Stepwise Discriminant Analysis (SDA) has opted the final variables from among of 42 variables and in the next stage, has applied 10-fold cross-validation to figure out the optimal model. McNemar test signifies that there is a significant difference between the two models in terms of prediction accuracy and CART model is able to predict going concern more accurately. The CART model reached 99.92 and 98.62 percent accuracy rates so as to training and holdout data.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Data Mining Approach to Prediction of Going Concern Using Classification and Regression Tree (CART)

Dr. Mahdi Salehi
Dr. Mahdi Salehi
Fezeh Zahedi Fard
Fezeh Zahedi Fard

Research Journals