Debate on the Role of Organizational Silence Behaviors and Employee Efficiency

α
Oduyoye, O
Oduyoye, O
σ
Oduyoye
Oduyoye
ρ
Francis-Odii
Francis-Odii
Ѡ
M. I
M. I
¥
Asikhia
Asikhia
§
O. U
O. U
χ
O. U.
O. U.
ν
O. U.=
O. U.=
α Babcock University

Send Message

To: Author

Debate on the Role of Organizational Silence Behaviors and Employee Efficiency

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

67M20

Debate on the Role of Organizational Silence Behaviors and Employee Efficiency Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Organizations are growingly demanding their staff to be innovative, to express their ideas and to be responsible for the excessive expectations of the customers, and focus on the quality service delivery as an indicator of changing world. However, it has been observed from literature that organizations find it difficult to achieve their set goals due to lack of committed employees. Thus the paper investigated the role of organisational silence behaviours on employee efficiency in selected private Universities in Ogun State, Nigeria. The work made use of quantitative survey design where questionnaire was employed as the instrument of data gathering from six hundred and ninety six employees from five selected private universities in Ogun State, Nigeria. The results from the multiple regression analysis conducted revealed that oorganizational silence behaviors have combined positive significant effect on employee efficiency (Adjusted R2= 0.218, F(5,620) = 35.886, p< 0.05)).

References

66 Cites in Article
  1. D Bağ,C Ekinci (2018). Organizational silence behaviors of faculty members, their causes and consequences.
  2. G Bagheri,R Zarei,A Nik,M (2014). Organizational silence (Basic concepts and its.
  3. Michael Barry,Adrian Wilkinson (2016). Pro‐Social or Pro‐Management? A Critique of the Conception of Employee Voice as a Pro‐Social Behaviour within Organizational Behaviour.
  4. M Beheshtifar,A Borhani,Moghadan (2012). Destructive role of employee silence in organizational success.
  5. P Blau (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life.
  6. R Bogosian (2012). Engaging organizational voice: A phenomenological study of employee's lived experiences of silence in work group settings.
  7. C Brainfield,M Edwards,J Greenberg,A (2013). Voice and Silence in Organizations.
  8. T Cakici (2010). The role of silence on employees' attitudes "the day after" a merger.
  9. O Cinar,F Karcioglu,Z Atiogullari (2013). The relationship between organizational silence and organizational citizenship behavior: A survey study in the province of Erzurum, Turkey.
  10. R Chris,A Kerstin,G Mark (2013). Employee voice and engagement: Connections and consequences.
  11. J Donaghey,N Cullinane,T Dundon,A Wilkinson (2011). Reconceptualising employee silence.
  12. Amy Edmondson (2003). Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams.
  13. Robert Eisenberger,Florence Stinglhamber (2011). Perceived organizational support..
  14. P Elbeyi,K Afyon,I Füsun,İ Dinçer (1941). The effect of nepotism on organizational silence, alienation and commitment: A study on hotel employees in Turkey.
  15. Rifah Utami (2014). Mediating Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior among Perceived Organizational Support, Employee Engagement, and Employee Performance: An Empirical Study at Regional Secretariat of Demak Regency, Indonesia.
  16. T Fapohunda (2016). Gender, voice and silence: Strategies for inclusion of female employees.
  17. R Firth (1967). Themes in economic anthropology.
  18. J Frances,A Cindy,A Bishara (2015). Linking workplace practices to community engagement: The case for encouraging employee voice.
  19. F Gambarotto,A Cammozzo (2010). Dreams of silence employee voice and innovation in a public sector.
  20. Nina Gupta,Jason Shaw (2014). Employee compensation: The neglected area of HRM research.
  21. Shabnam Hamdi,Mahmoud Rajablu (2012). Effect of Supervisor-Subordinate Communication and Leadership Style on Organizational Commitment of Nurses in Health Care Setting.
  22. M Herfferner,T Dundon (2017). The role of front line managers in employee voice: A social exchange perspective.
  23. George Homans (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange.
  24. M Ikon,A Chukwu (2017). Employee engagement and performance of selected private universities in Delta state, Nigeria.
  25. M Irbha (2016). Why employees who speak up sometimes remain silent.
  26. A Inayet,E Özge,T Sildiroglu,D Güner,T &burcu (2016). Silence belongs to the young, speech belongs to the old: The reason why research assistants remain silent.
  27. Ampol Chayomchai (2015). Relationships between Organizational Culture, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
  28. Sarah Kaine (2012). Employee voice and regulation in the residential aged care sector.
  29. S Katsuhiko (2017). Senders' bias: How can top managers' communication improve or not improve strategy implementation.
  30. M Khademfar,S Amiri (2013). The relationship between ethical leadership and organizational performance.
  31. R Katrina (2012). Evaluating the performance of an organization/ better evaluation Beta.
  32. R Krejcie,D Morgan (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.
  33. Sunil Kumar,Rachita Gulati (2010). Measuring efficiency, effectiveness and performance of Indian public sector banks.
  34. Jeffrey Lepine,Linn Van Dyne (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups..
  35. T Levine,S Kim (2010). Social exchange, uncertainty, and communication content as factors impacting the relational outcomes of betrayal.
  36. B Malikeh,B Hossein,N Mahmood,M Moghadam (2012). Destructive role of employee silence in organizational success.
  37. B Malinowski (1922). Argonauts of the western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagos of Melansian New Guinea.
  38. V Maria,B Dimitris (2014). Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: an empirical investigation.
  39. Elizabeth Mcclean,Ethan Burris,James Detert (2013). When Does Voice Lead to Exit? It Depends on Leadership.
  40. M Mitchell,R Cropanzano (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review.
  41. Elizabeth Morrison (2011). Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research.
  42. W Nafei (2016). Organizational silence: Its destroying role of organizational citizenship behavior.
  43. U Naqib,K Muhammad,U Hafiz (2016). Relationship between organizational silence and citizenship behavior-mediating role of commitments: Evidence from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Universities.
  44. Habibeh Najafi,Ali Khaleghkhah (2017). The Impact of Organizational Silence on Organizational Performance (Case Study: Nurses of Mazandaran Bo-Ali-Sina hospital).
  45. Ioannis Nikolaou,Maria Vakola,Dimitris Bourantas (2011). The role of silence on employees' attitudes “the day after” a merger.
  46. S Nikmaram,Y Gharibi,S Shojaii,Z Ahmadi,S Alvani (2012). Correlation between Organizational Culture and Organizational Commitment of Nurses at Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
  47. N Okoro,E Okoro (2014). Time and change: Development of private Universities in Nigeria.
  48. A Owuor (2014). Organizational silence affecting the effectiveness of organizations in Kenya: A case study of safaricom call center.
  49. L Özdemir,S Sarıoğlu Uğur (2013). Evaluation of organizational voice and silence perceptions of the employees in terms of demographic characteristics. A survey of public and private sector.
  50. M Ozturk,K Eryesil,A Beduk (2016). The effect of organizational justice organizational cynicism and turnover intention: A research on the banking sector.
  51. Belal Panahi,Seidmahdi Veiseh,Said Divkhar,Farideh Kamari (2012). An empirical analysis on influencing factors on organizational silence and its relationship with employee’s organizational commitment.
  52. J Peter,C Belinda,K Brian (2013). Reducing burnout in Australian nurses: The role of employee direct voice and managerial responsiveness.
  53. B Pinprayong,S Siengtai (2012). Restructuring and Sustainability-Corporate Strategy of Commercial Bank in Thailand: A Siam Commercial Bank.
  54. C Proctor (2014). Effective organizational communication affects employee attitude, happiness, and job satisfaction.
  55. M Redmond (2015). Social Exchange Theory.
  56. Shonubi, A.O.,Akintaro, A.A (2016). The Impact Of Effective Communication On Organizational Performance..
  57. T Subrahmaniam,H Robert,R Rangaraj (2012). Ask and you shall hear (but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice.
  58. M Sahlins (1972). Stone age economics.
  59. Randall Settoon,Nathan Bennett,Robert Liden (1996). Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader-Member Exchange, and Employee Reciprocity.
  60. Subrahmaniam Tangirala,Rangaraj Ramanujam (2008). EMPLOYEE SILENCE ON CRITICAL WORK ISSUES: THE CROSS LEVEL EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE.
  61. J Thibaut,H Kelley (1959). The social psychology of groups.
  62. Marlene Turner,Anthony Pratkanis (1998). A Social Identity Maintenance Model of Groupthink.
  63. Maria Vakola,Dimitris Bouradas (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: an empirical investigation.
  64. Ellen Whitener,Susan Brodt,M Korsgaard,Jon Werner (2001). Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior.
  65. E Yıldız (2013). Enigma of silence in organizations: What happens to whom and why?.
  66. A Zaid,S Lily,A Mohd (2017). Employee voice and job satisfaction: An application of Herzberg's two-factor theory.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Oduyoye, O. 2020. \u201cDebate on the Role of Organizational Silence Behaviors and Employee Efficiency\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 20 (GJMBR Volume 20 Issue A6): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification: JEL Code: D23
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

April 4, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2536
Total Downloads: 1195
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Organizations are growingly demanding their staff to be innovative, to express their ideas and to be responsible for the excessive expectations of the customers, and focus on the quality service delivery as an indicator of changing world. However, it has been observed from literature that organizations find it difficult to achieve their set goals due to lack of committed employees. Thus the paper investigated the role of organisational silence behaviours on employee efficiency in selected private Universities in Ogun State, Nigeria. The work made use of quantitative survey design where questionnaire was employed as the instrument of data gathering from six hundred and ninety six employees from five selected private universities in Ogun State, Nigeria. The results from the multiple regression analysis conducted revealed that oorganizational silence behaviors have combined positive significant effect on employee efficiency (Adjusted R2= 0.218, F(5,620) = 35.886, p< 0.05)).

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Debate on the Role of Organizational Silence Behaviors and Employee Efficiency

Oduyoye
Oduyoye
Francis-Odii
Francis-Odii
M. I
M. I
Asikhia
Asikhia
O. U
O. U
Asikhia
Asikhia
O. U.
O. U.
Asikhia
Asikhia
O. U.=
O. U.=
Asikhia
Asikhia
O. U.
O. U.

Research Journals