Detecting Sentiments from Movie Reviews by Integrating Reviewers Own Prejudice

Detecting Sentiments from Movie Reviews by Integrating Reviewers Own Prejudice

Swati Gupta

Contact

Kalpana Yadav

Contact

Sumit K. Yadav

Contact

α Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women

Detecting Sentiments from Movie Reviews by Integrating Reviewers Own Prejudice

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

ASIK9

Detecting Sentiments from Movie Reviews by Integrating Reviewers Own Prejudice Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Presently, sentiment analysis algorithms are widely used to extract positive or negative feedback scores of various objects on the basis of the text/reviews. But, an individual may have a certain degree of biasness towards a certain product/company and hence may not objectively review the object. We try to combat this biasness problem by incorporating the positive and negative bias component in the existing sentiment score of the object. This paper proposes several algorithms for a new system of implementing individual bias in the corpus of data i.e. movie reviews in this case. Each review comment has an unadjusted sentiment score associated with it. This unadjusted score is refined to give an adjusted score using the positive and negative bias score. The bias score is calculated using certain parameters, the weightage of which has been determined by conducting a survey. We lay emphasis on the degree of biasness an individual has towards or against the review parameters for the movie reviews corpus namely actor, director and genre. We equip the system with the capability to handle various scenarios like positive inclination of the user, negative inclination of the user, presence of both positive and negative inclination of the user and neutral attitude of the user by implementing the formulae we developed.

References

27 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Soo-Min Kim,Eduard Hovy (1367). Determining the sentiment of opinions.
H Cui,V Mittal,M Datar (2003). Comparative Experiments on Sentiment Classification for Online Product Reviews.
S,S (2013). Sentiment Analysis Based Approaches for Understanding User Context in Web Content Dept of Information Technology.
K Dave,S Lawrence,D Pennock (2003). Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews.
M Wu,L Wang,L Yi,(n.D A Novel Approach Based on Review Mining for Product Usability Analysis.
Gil De Zuniga,H Puig-I-Abril,E Rojas,H Sciences (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment.
Park,Ko,Kim,Liu,E Song ; Kontopoulos,C Berberidis,T Dergiades,N Bassiliades (2011). Ontology-based sentiment analysis of twitter posts.
Anders Larsson,Hallvard Moe (2011). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign.
E Lin,Shiaofen Fang,Jie Wang (2013). Mining Online Book Reviews for Sentimental Clustering.
B Wen,W Dai,J Zhao (2012). Sentence Sentimental Classification Based on Semantic Comprehension.
Yi-Fen Chen (2008). Herd behavior in purchasing books online.
Guillaume Deffuant,Sylvie Huet (2009). Collective increase of first impression bias.
S Piramuthu,G Kapoor,W Zhou,S Mauw (2012). Input online review data and related bias in recommender systems.
B Liu (2010). Sentiment Analysis and Subjectivity Bing Liu.
Y Liu,Huang Unknown Title.
M Wu,L Wang,L Yi,(n.D A Novel Approach Based on Review Mining for Product Usability Analysis.
N Mishra,C Jha (2013). Restricted Domain Opinion Mining in Compound Sentences.
A Bencz (2012). Content-Based Trust and Bias Classification via.
Marco Cipriani,Antonio Guarino (2012). Estimating a Structural Model of Herd Behavior in Financial Markets.
Riyaz Sikora,Kriti Chauhan (2012). Estimating sequential bias in online reviews: A Kalman filtering approach.
C Wang,X Zhang,I Hann,(n.D (2010). Social Bias in Online Product Ratings : A Quasi-Experimental Analysis.
Selwyn Piramuthu,Gaurav Kapoor,Wei Zhou,Sjouke Mauw (2012). Input online review data and related bias in recommender systems.
S Jusoh,H Alfawareh (2013). Applying fuzzy sets for opinion mining.
E Lin,Shiaofen Fang,Jie Wang (2013). Mining Online Book Reviews for Sentimental Clustering.
Y Huang,H Lin (2013). Web product ranking using opinion mining.
M Wu,L Wang,L Yi,(n.D A Novel Approach Based on Review Mining for Product Usability Analysis.
N Mishra,C Jha (2013). Restricted Domain Opinion Mining in Compound Sentences.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Swati Gupta. 2016. \u201cDetecting Sentiments from Movie Reviews by Integrating Reviewers Own Prejudice\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - G: Interdisciplinary GJCST-G Volume 15 (GJCST Volume 15 Issue G2): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJCST Volume 15 Issue G2
Pg. 1- 6

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

I.3.3

Submission ReceivedApril 10, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted May 2, 2015
Published May 15, 2015

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 7, 2016

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 103

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - G: Interdisciplinary

Authors: Kalpana Yadav, Sumit K. Yadav, Swati Gupta (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 281

Total Views (Real + Logic): 8102

Total Downloads (simulated): 2049

Publish Date: 2016 01, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 34 views
Month 2: 45 views
Month 3: 59 views
Month 4: 66 views
Month 5: 40 views
Month 6: 30 views
Month 7: 31 views
Month 8: 30 views
Month 9: 33 views
Month 10: 37 views
Month 11: 47 views
Month 12: 29 views
Month 13: 31 views
Month 14: 24 views
Month 15: 23 views
Month 16: 41 views
Month 17: 28 views
Month 18: 24 views
Month 19: 30 views
Month 20: 29 views
Month 21: 41 views
Month 22: 35 views
Month 23: 28 views
Month 24: 42 views
Month 25: 40 views
Month 26: 19 views
Month 27: 26 views
Month 28: 28 views
Month 29: 36 views
Month 30: 11 views
Month 31: 35 views
Month 32: 22 views
Month 33: 35 views
Month 34: 21 views
Month 35: 42 views
Month 36: 41 views
Month 37: 32 views
Month 38: 34 views
Month 39: 34 views
Month 40: 18 views
Month 41: 24 views
Month 42: 23 views
Month 43: 49 views
Month 44: 34 views
Month 45: 41 views
Month 46: 41 views
Month 47: 31 views
Month 48: 19 views
Month 49: 33 views
Month 50: 21 views
Month 51: 36 views
Month 52: 22 views
Month 53: 39 views
Month 54: 38 views
Month 55: 46 views
Month 56: 35 views
Month 57: 33 views
Month 58: 28 views
Month 59: 38 views
Month 60: 20 views
Month 61: 41 views
Month 62: 14 views
Month 63: 45 views
Month 64: 28 views
Month 65: 32 views
Month 66: 33 views
Month 67: 27 views
Month 68: 24 views
Month 69: 32 views
Month 70: 23 views
Month 71: 26 views
Month 72: 17 views
Month 73: 34 views
Month 74: 25 views
Month 75: 17 views
Month 76: 38 views
Month 77: 25 views
Month 78: 38 views
Month 79: 14 views
Month 80: 28 views
Month 81: 28 views
Month 82: 31 views
Month 83: 12 views
Month 84: 49 views
Month 85: 24 views
Month 86: 30 views
Month 87: 23 views
Month 88: 40 views
Month 89: 28 views
Month 90: 15 views
Month 91: 28 views
Month 92: 44 views
Month 93: 45 views
Month 94: 27 views
Month 95: 23 views
Month 96: 35 views
Month 97: 34 views
Month 98: 24 views
Month 99: 46 views
Month 100: 12 views
Month 101: 24 views
Month 102: 23 views
Month 103: 24 views
Month 104: 23 views
Month 105: 35 views
Month 106: 34 views
Month 107: 39 views
Month 108: 34 views
Month 109: 39 views
Month 110: 37 views
Month 111: 32 views
Month 112: 32 views
Month 113: 20 views
Month 114: 35 views
Month 115: 42 views
Month 116: 45 views
Month 117: 38 views
Month 118: 34 views
Month 119: 17 views
Month 120: 31 views
Month 121: 21 views
Month 122: 33 views
Month 123: 42 views
Month 124: 39 views

Total Views: 8102

Total Downloads: 2049

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]