Determinant of Biogas Technology Adoption and Its Implication on Environmental Sustainablity: A Case of Aletawondo Woreda, Sidama Zone, South Ethiopia.

α
Gosaye Shegenu
Gosaye Shegenu
σ
Abrham Seyoum
Abrham Seyoum

Send Message

To: Author

Determinant of Biogas Technology Adoption and Its Implication on Environmental Sustainablity:  A Case of Aletawondo Woreda, Sidama Zone, South Ethiopia.

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

7Q5CV

Determinant of Biogas Technology Adoption and Its Implication on Environmental Sustainablity:  A Case of Aletawondo Woreda, Sidama Zone, South Ethiopia. Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The study aims to assessing the role of biogas technology in saving biomass, mitigating green-house gases (GHG) emissions, and maintaining environmental sustainability in Aleta wondo woreda. The sample size, 196 households were selected and interviewed in systematic random sampling techniques. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logit with the aid of STATA. Adoption of biogas technology significantly determined by proximity to water, access to credit, cattle size, availability of trained mason, land size and annual income. On average 1066.80kg biomass and 25.2 liter kerosene reduced; 2160.93kg CO 2 equivalent GHG emissions to the atmosphere mitigated annually per adopter households in the study area.

References

29 Cites in Article
  1. (2018). Unknown Title.
  2. Deginet Berhanu,Aklilu Atnafu (2023). UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF AGROFORESTRY: UNDERSTANDING ADOPTION FACTORS IN ALETA WENDO DISTRICT, SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA.
  3. T Amemiya (1981). Qualitative response models: A Survey.
  4. Anushiya Shrestha (2010). Prospects of Biogas in Terms of Socio-Economic and Environmental Benefits to Rural 5.
  5. Colton Arkin (1963). H. Arkin & R.R. Colton, Tables for Statisticians. College outline series. Second Edition. New York, Barnes & Noble Inc., 1970, 27 tables, 168 p..
  6. S Bajgain,I Shakya (2005). The Nepal Biogas Support Program: A successful model of public private partnership for rural.
  7. Bekele Gaddisa (2011). Biogas Production System Design for Condominium and Its Feasibility: Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
  8. Alemayehu Darge Dalbiso,Denamo Nuramo (2007). Ethiopian vernacular bamboo architecture and its potentials for adaptation in modern urban housing: A case study.
  9. Zewdu Abawa,Alemayehu Nigatu,Abay Misganaw (2012). ISO 15189 Laboratory Accreditation Utilization Rate and Challenges Among Accredited Laboratories in Ethiopia, 2021.
  10. G Garson (2008). Logistic regression: Stat notes from North Carolina Sate University.
  11. H Greene (1991). Econometric Analysis.
  12. W Greene (1997). Econometric Analysis.
  13. D Gujarati (2003). Damodar GUJARATI. Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, 1978..
  14. D Hosmer,S Lemeshew (1989). Applied Logistic Regression.
  15. Jan Lam,Felix Ter Heegde (2010). Domestic Biogas Compact Course Technology and Mass-Dissemination Experiences from Asia, Hand-Out for Students.
  16. Karthik Rajendran (2012). Household Biogas Digesters -A Review.
  17. G Maddala (1992). Introduction to Econometrics.
  18. D Mcfadden (2002). Econometric models of probabilistic choice.
  19. Mulugeta Sosango,Amanuel Ashebo,Demelash Kalo (2009). Prevalence of bovine mastitis in smallholder lactating dairy farms in Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia.
  20. Mowe (2012). Ethiopia National Energy Policy.
  21. S Muriuki (2008). Analysis of Biogas Technology for Household Energy, Sustainable Livelihoods and Climate Change Mitigation, Kenya 24.
  22. Nbpe (2013). AFG : water resources development investment program tranche 2 : Lower Kokcha irrigation project : Initial environmental examination / prepared by the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Energy and Water, and Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Lievestock for the Asian Development Bank (ADB)..
  23. R Pindyck,C Rubinfeld (1981). Econometric Models and Econometric Forecasts.
  24. J Somda (2002). Soil fertility management and socioeconomic factors in crop-livestock systems in Burkina Faso: a case study of composting technology.
  25. (2009). The Energy Access in Situation in Developing Countries: A Review Focusing on the Least Developed Countries and Sub-Saharan Africa.
  26. Lars Walekhwa (2009). Biogas energy from family-sized digesters in Uganda: Critical factors and policy implications.
  27. Adugna Girma,Gerema Abera,Shewareged Girma,Immabet Sori,Gululat Teklu,Gemta Hailu,Zennebech Gelalcha (2014). Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Ovine Fasciolosis in Ejere District, West Shewa, Ethiopia.
  28. (2012). Ethiopia Climate Project Receives Africa's First Forestry Carbon Credits under the CDM.
  29. Y Zerihun (2014). The benefits of the use of biogas energy in rural areas in Ethiopia: A case study from the Amahara National Regional State, Fogera District.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Gosaye Shegenu. 2018. \u201cDeterminant of Biogas Technology Adoption and Its Implication on Environmental Sustainablity: A Case of Aletawondo Woreda, Sidama Zone, South Ethiopia.\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - B: Geography, Environmental Science & Disaster Management GJHSS-B Volume 18 (GJHSS Volume 18 Issue B1): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 18 Issue B1
Pg. 33- 39
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-B Classification: FOR Code: 059999
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 27, 2018

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3335
Total Downloads: 1663
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The study aims to assessing the role of biogas technology in saving biomass, mitigating green-house gases (GHG) emissions, and maintaining environmental sustainability in Aleta wondo woreda. The sample size, 196 households were selected and interviewed in systematic random sampling techniques. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logit with the aid of STATA. Adoption of biogas technology significantly determined by proximity to water, access to credit, cattle size, availability of trained mason, land size and annual income. On average 1066.80kg biomass and 25.2 liter kerosene reduced; 2160.93kg CO 2 equivalent GHG emissions to the atmosphere mitigated annually per adopter households in the study area.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Determinant of Biogas Technology Adoption and Its Implication on Environmental Sustainablity: A Case of Aletawondo Woreda, Sidama Zone, South Ethiopia.

Gosaye Shegenu
Gosaye Shegenu
Abrham Seyoum
Abrham Seyoum

Research Journals