Determinants of Electronic Learning Adoption in Higher Institutions of Learning in Uganda: A Learnersa Perspective

Determinants of Electronic Learning Adoption in Higher Institutions of Learning in Uganda: A Learnersa Perspective

Juma Sonny Nyeko

Contact

Cosmas Ogenmungu

Contact

1 Makerere University Business School

GJCST Volume 17 Issue H1

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTIT53B89

Determinants of Electronic Learning Adoption in Higher Institutions of Learning in Uganda: A Learnersa Perspective Banner

The introduction of electronic learning (EL) has been initiated in Higher Institutions of Learning (HIL) as an attempt to improve on education institutions’ service delivery. By adopting the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, this study was aimed at investigating the determinants of the e-learning adoption in HIL where eight TOE factors were examined. The study adopted a quantitative approach, a descriptive research and cross-sectional survey for the research design. A questionnaire was developed based on the eight identified TOE study constructs and administered to a population of 5438 students in three Faculties of Makerere University Business School (MUBS). In regard to data analysis, factor analysis and assessment of reliability and validity of the measurements items was done. Finally, a multiple regression analysis was carried out to evaluate the relationship between the predictor variables and e-learning adoption.

67 Cites in Articles

References

S Al-Fadhli (2011). Factors Influencing the acceptance of distance-learning.
Salem Alkhalaf,Steve Drew,Rayed Alghamdi,Osama Alfarraj (2012). E-Learning System on Higher Education Institutions in KSA: Attitudes and Perceptions of Faculty Members.
Eric Ansong,Sheena Boateng,Richard Boateng,John Effah (2016). Determinants of E-Learning Adoption in Universities: Evidence from a Developing Country.
Earl Babbie (1998). Earl Babbie Discusses Social Research.
P Bhattarai (2011). Unknown Title.
M Betts,P Black,S Christensen,E Dawson,R Du,W Duncan,E Foo,J Nieto (2006). Towards secure and legal e-tendering.
N Blaikie (2003). Analyzing Quantitative Data: From Description to Explanation.
P Chau,C Jim (2002). Adoption of Electronic Data Interchange in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.
A Chong,K Ooi,B Lin,M Raman (2009). Factors affecting the adoption level of E-Commerce: An empirical study.
L Cronbach (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.
D Cooper,P Schindler (2010). Business Research Methods.
C Dawson (2002). Practical Research Methods.
De Haes,S,W Van Grembergen (2006). Information Technology Governance Best Practices in Belgian Organizations.
L Deng,N Tavares (2013). From Moodle to Face experiences in online communities.
L Dublin (2004). The nine myths of e-learning Implementation: Ensuring the real return on your elearning investment.
R Ellis (2009). Field Guide to Learning Management Systems.
Sunday Eze,Hart Awa,Joseph Okoye,Bartholomew Emecheta,Rosemary Anazodo (2013). Determinant factors of information communication technology (ICT) adoption by government‐owned universities in Nigeria.
Simon Knight,Simon Buckingham Shum (2000). Theory and Learning Analytics.
Varun Grover (1993). An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems*.
H Henriksen,V Mahnke (2005). E-Procurement Adoption in the Danish Public Sector.
Paul Henry (2001). E‐learning technology, content and services.
A Islam (2013). Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the university context.
C Janssen (2015). Course Management System (CMS).
A Iacovou,I Benbasat,A Dexter (1995). Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology.
E Leung,Q Li (2006). Distance Learning in Hong Kong.
H Lin,S Lin (2008). Determinants of e-business diffusion: A test of the technology diffusion perspective.
Chinyao Low,Yahsueh Chen,Mingchang Wu (2011). Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption.
Alex Koohang,Keith Harman (2005). Open Source: A Metaphor for E-Learning.
R Kumar (2005). Research Methodology-A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners.
Henry Manheim (1977). Sociological Research: Philosophy & Methods.
Mindflash (2015). Types of Learning Management Systems.
Michael Myers (1997). Qualitative Research in Information Systems.
T Meyer (2011). Efficiency & Effectiveness, Bench-High Impact Services with Pan-European Scope Interoperability Policy.
H Motaghian,A Hassanzadeh,D Moghadam (1999). Factors affecting university instructors' adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran.
Jeff Baker (2011). The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework.
L Neuman (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.
P Nitithamyong,M Skibniewski (2007). Key success/failure factors and their impacts on system performance of web-based project management systems in construction.
Norsaniah Noh,Posiah Isa,Siti Samah,Norzaidah Noh,Mohd Isa (2012). Establishing an Organisational e-learning Culture to Motivate Lecturers to Engage in e-Learning in UiTM.
Yohana Obiye,Kelvin Omieno,Collins Phd (2024). A Framework for Enhancing Maintainability of CMS in Kenyan Universities' LMS.
J Nunnally (1978). Psychometric Theory.
J Pallant (2001). SPSS Survival Manual 5th Edition.
G Premkumar,Margaret Roberts (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses.
A Preston (2001). Paper Free Tendering -A 21st Century Alternative.
S Ramanathan (2004). Diffusion of e-Procurement in the Public Sector -Revisiting Centralization versus Decentralization Debates as a Twist in the Tale.
Boumediene Ramdani,Peter Kawalek,Oswaldo Lorenzo (2009). Predicting SMEs' adoption of enterprise systems.
Frank Raymond (2000). Delivering distance education through technology: a pioneer’s experience.
J Raouf,I Naser,B Jassim (2012). Determinants of E-learning Implementation Success in the Iraqi MoHE.
I Roffe (2002). E-learning-engagement, enhancement and execution.
E Rogers (2003). Diffusion of innovations.
R Roy,S Potter,K Yarrow (2008). Designing low carbon higher education systems: Environmental im pacts of campus and distance learning systems.
T Oliveira,M Martins (2010). Firms patterns of e-business adoption: Evidence for the European Union-27.
M Quayle (2005). The (Real) Management Implications of E-procurement: The Importance of Involving People.
Sekaran (1992). Book Reviews : Business English Basics: A Programmed Approach. Ruth Moyer, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980, 568 pages (paper).
J Stevens (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences.
B Tabachnick,L Fidell (2001). Using multivariate statistics.
Technopedia (2015). Course Management System (CMS).
Louis Tornatzky,Esther Fergus,Joseph Avellar,George Fairweather,Michael Fleischer (1990). An Overview.
L Tornatzky,K Klein (1982). Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption Implementation: a meta-analysis of findings.
J Thong,C Yap,K Raman (1997). Environments for information systems implementation in small businesses.
J Thong (2001). Resource constraints and information systems implementation in Singaporean small businesses.
James Thong (1999). An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses.
Wim Van Grembergen,Steven De Haes (2008). Implementing Information Technology Governance.
Un (1999). A/RES/68/43. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 5 December 2013.
K Zhu,K Kraemer,S Xu (2002). A Cross-country Study of Electronic Business Adoption Using the Technology-Organization-Environment framework.
K Zhu,K Kraemer,S Xu (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on ebusiness.
K Zhu,S Xu,D Dedrick (2003). Assessing Drivers of E-busines Value: Results of a Cross Country Study.
P Namisiko,C Munialo,S Nyongesa (2014). Towards an Optimization Framework for E-learning in Developing Countries: A Case of Private.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Juma Sonny Nyeko. 2017. \u201cDeterminants of Electronic Learning Adoption in Higher Institutions of Learning in Uganda: A Learnersa Perspective\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - H: Information & Technology GJCST-H Volume 17 (GJCST Volume 17 Issue H1): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJCST Volume 17 Issue H1
Pg. 7- 20

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJCST-H Classification: J.4, K.4.2

Submission ReceivedDecember 10, 2016
RevisedDecember 10, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2017
Published January 15, 2017

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 13, 2017

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: Uganda

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - H: Information & Technology

Authors: Juma Sonny Nyeko, Cosmas Ogenmungu (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 262

Total Views (Real + Logic): 6671

Total Downloads (simulated): 1741

Publish Date: 2017 03, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 38 views
Month 2: 45 views
Month 3: 33 views
Month 4: 37 views
Month 5: 22 views
Month 6: 36 views
Month 7: 46 views
Month 8: 25 views
Month 9: 51 views
Month 10: 35 views
Month 11: 49 views
Month 12: 36 views
Month 13: 23 views
Month 14: 21 views
Month 15: 17 views
Month 16: 23 views
Month 17: 24 views
Month 18: 45 views
Month 19: 31 views
Month 20: 15 views
Month 21: 19 views
Month 22: 46 views
Month 23: 42 views
Month 24: 43 views
Month 25: 20 views
Month 26: 28 views
Month 27: 27 views
Month 28: 32 views
Month 29: 38 views
Month 30: 34 views
Month 31: 26 views
Month 32: 22 views
Month 33: 33 views
Month 34: 29 views
Month 35: 27 views
Month 36: 16 views
Month 37: 24 views
Month 38: 41 views
Month 39: 34 views
Month 40: 29 views
Month 41: 18 views
Month 42: 29 views
Month 43: 22 views
Month 44: 36 views
Month 45: 41 views
Month 46: 46 views
Month 47: 24 views
Month 48: 34 views
Month 49: 35 views
Month 50: 25 views
Month 51: 26 views
Month 52: 25 views
Month 53: 21 views
Month 54: 34 views
Month 55: 32 views
Month 56: 37 views
Month 57: 43 views
Month 58: 37 views
Month 59: 43 views
Month 60: 11 views
Month 61: 24 views
Month 62: 21 views
Month 63: 20 views
Month 64: 28 views
Month 65: 27 views
Month 66: 25 views
Month 67: 36 views
Month 68: 24 views
Month 69: 45 views
Month 70: 30 views
Month 71: 34 views
Month 72: 42 views
Month 73: 33 views
Month 74: 32 views
Month 75: 29 views
Month 76: 23 views
Month 77: 39 views
Month 78: 45 views
Month 79: 42 views
Month 80: 23 views
Month 81: 39 views
Month 82: 28 views
Month 83: 27 views
Month 84: 50 views
Month 85: 29 views
Month 86: 38 views
Month 87: 33 views
Month 88: 38 views
Month 89: 47 views
Month 90: 21 views
Month 91: 26 views
Month 92: 37 views
Month 93: 23 views
Month 94: 39 views
Month 95: 34 views
Month 96: 33 views
Month 97: 25 views
Month 98: 20 views
Month 99: 30 views
Month 100: 35 views
Month 101: 22 views
Month 102: 49 views
Month 103: 52 views
Month 104: 40 views
Month 105: 26 views
Month 106: 46 views
Month 107: 25 views
Month 108: 34 views
Month 109: 32 views

Total Views: 6671

Total Downloads: 1741

2026 Trends

Research Identity (RIN)

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.