1. Global Journal of Human Social Science -Year 2016 Differences in Academic Performance by Grade Span Configuration for Students in Poverty. Global Journal of Human Social Science -Year 2016 Differences in Academic Performance by Grade Span Configuration for Students in Poverty
2. Virginia Burney,Jayne Beilke (2008). The Constraints of Poverty on High Achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(3), 295-321.
3. B Carolan,N Chesky (2012). The relationship among grade configuration, school attachment, and achievement. Middle School Journal, 43(4), 32-39.
4. Madhabi Chatterji (2006). Reading achievement gaps, correlates, and moderators of early reading achievement: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS) kindergarten to first grade sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 489-507.
5. James Delviscio (2012). The impact of school-to-school transitions on academic achievement : an analysis of various grade-span configurations utilized by public school districts in New York State.
6. D Clark,J Slate,J Combs,G Moore (2013). Math and reading differences between 6-8 and K-8 grade span configurations: A multiyear, statewide analysis. Current Issues in Education, 16(2), 1-14.
7. C Clotfelter,H Ladd,J Vigdor (2011). Teacher mobility, school segregation, and paybased policies to level the playing field. Education Finance and Policy, 6, 399-438.
8. J Cohen (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
9. R Coley,B Baker (2013). Report of the ETS center for research on human capital and education. Report of the ETS center for research on human capital and education
10. (2012). 2012 college-bound seniors total group profile report. 2012 college-bound seniors total group profile report
11. J Combs,D Clark,G Moore,A Onwuegbuzie,S Edmonson,J Slate (2011). Academic achievement for fifth-grade students in elementary and intermediate school settings: Grade span configurations. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-45.
12. H Comer (2006). The effects of grade span configuration on fifth graders.
13. J Creswell (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
14. Anne Cunningham,Keith Stanovich (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934-945.
15. Carmen Denavas-Walt,Bernadette Proctor,Jessica Smith (2013). Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage In The United States: 2006. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P, 60-249.
16. M Dove (2007). The relationship between grade span configuration and academic achievement.
17. Jacquelynne Eccles,Bonnie Barber,Margaret Stone,James Hunt (2003). Extracurricular Activities and Adolescent Development. Journal of Social Issues, 59(4), 865-889.
18. C Fiaschetti,J Slate (2015). Differences in student achievement by grade span configuration for students who were economically disadvantaged. Differences in student achievement by grade span configuration for students who were economically disadvantaged
19. Private and public schools: International perspectives, management and educational efficiency. Private and public schools: International perspectives, management and educational efficiency, 1-9.
20. P Gorski (2012). Perceiving the problem of poverty and schooling: Deconstructing the class stereotypes that mis-shape education practice and policy. Equity and Excellence in Education, 45, 302-319.
21. James Delviscio (2002). The impact of school-to-school transitions on academic achievement : an analysis of various grade-span configurations utilized by public school districts in New York State. School Administrator, 59(3), 24-29.
22. J Huss (2004). Monitoring the middle school movement: Are teachers in step? Current Issues in Education. Monitoring the middle school movement: Are teachers in step? Current Issues in Education, 7
23. B Johnson,L Christensen (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches
24. D Johnson,L Jones,F Simieou,K Matthew,B Morgan (2012). The relationship between grade configuration and standardized science test scores of fifth-grade students: What school administrators should know. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 17(2), 31-38.
25. O Jorgenson (2012). Winning in a Win-Lose System: Why We Stay. Becoming a Win-Win Teacher: Survival Strategies for the Beginning Educator, 91, 34-49.
26. Adena Klem,James Connell (2004). Relationships Matter: Linking Teacher Support to Student Engagement and Achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273.
27. M Mccormick,E O'connor (2015). Teacher-child relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: Does gender matter. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 502-516.
28. S Meyer (2014). An examination of the effect of school grade configuration on Grade 5 student academic achievement in mathematics, reading, and science in Texas as measured by TAKS for. An examination of the effect of school grade configuration on Grade 5 student academic achievement in mathematics, reading, and science in Texas as measured by TAKS for
