Differences in Disciplinary Consequence for Texas Middle School Boys as a Function of Ethnicity/Raceand Economic Status

α
John R. Slate
John R. Slate
σ
Christopher Eckford
Christopher Eckford
α Sam Houston State University Sam Houston State University

Send Message

To: Author

Differences in Disciplinary Consequence for Texas Middle School Boys as a Function of Ethnicity/Raceand Economic Status

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

12EK5

Differences in Disciplinary Consequence for Texas Middle School Boys as a Function of Ethnicity/Raceand Economic Status Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Examined in this study was the degree to which differences were present in Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP) placements for Grade 7 and 8 boys in Texas as a function of their ethnicity/race and economic status. Texas statewide middle school discipline data were obtained from the Texas Education Agency Public Education Information Management System on all boys in the 2010-2011 school year. Inferential statistical procedures revealed the presence of statistically significant differences in JJAEP placements forboys in both Grades 7 and 8 as a function of their economic status and ethnicity/race. In both Grade 7 and Grade 8, Black boys had statistically significantly higher percentage of JJAEP placements than their White counterparts, 3 to 4 times higher. For Hispanic boys in Grades 7 and 8, they had a JJAEP placement rate that was 2 to 3 times higher than the JJAEP placement rate of White boys.

References

29 Cites in Article
  1. (2014). Rehabilitative Juvenile Justice.
  2. Judith Ruchkin (1975). Book Reviews: <i>School Suspensions: Are They Helping Children?</i> A Report of the Children’s Defense Fund of the Washington Research Project, Inc., Cambridge: Children’s Defense Fund, 1975. 257 + vi pp. $4.00.
  3. (2011). Breaking schools' rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students' success and juvenile justice involvement.
  4. R Dahlberg (2012). From Hospital‐School to School‐Hospital.
  5. K Evans,J Lester,V Anfara (2010). Classroom management and discipline: Responding to the needs of young adolescents.
  6. P Fenning,J Rose (2007). Overrepresentation of African American students in exclusionary discipline: The role of school policy.
  7. Charles Frazier,Donna Bishop,John Henretta (1992). The Social Context of Race Differentials in Juvenile Justice Dispositions.
  8. J Gonzalez,E Szecsy (2004). The condition of minority access and participation in Arizona.
  9. Anne Gregory,Russell Skiba,Pedro Noguera (2010). The Achievement Gap and the Discipline Gap.
  10. (2015). Industrial Policing and Espionage.
  11. M Hilberth,J Slate (2014). Middle school Black and White student assignment to disciplinary consequence: A clear lack of equity.
  12. M Jones,J Slate,C Martinez-Garcia (2014). Discipline inequities between White and Hispanic middle school students: An analysis of the research literature.
  13. M Jones,J Slate,C Martinez-Garcia (2015). School discipline and Grade 6 Hispanic and White student academic performance: A statewide investigation.
  14. Brianna Kennedy-Lewis,Amy Murphy,Tanetha Grosland (2014). Using narrative inquiry to understand persistently disciplined middle school students.
  15. Myriam Khan,John Slate (2016). Disciplinary Consequence Differences in Grade 6 Students as a Function of Race, Ethnicity, and Economic Status.
  16. Russell Skiba,Mariella Arredondo,Natasha Williams (2014). More Than a Metaphor: The Contribution of Exclusionary Discipline to a School-to-Prison Pipeline.
  17. Russell Skiba,Robert Horner,Choong-Geun Chung,M Rausch,Seth May,Tary Tobin (2011). Race Is Not Neutral: A National Investigation of African American and Latino Disproportionality in School Discipline.
  18. R Skiba,R Peterson (1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools?.
  19. R Skiba,M Rausch (2006). Zero Tolerance, Suspension, and Expulsion: Questions of Equity and Effectiveness.
  20. E Smith,S Harper (2015). Disproportionate impact of K-12 school suspension and expulsion on Black students in southern states.
  21. Amanda Sullivan,David Klingbeil,Ethan Van Norman (2013). Beyond Behavior: Multilevel Analysis of the Influence of Sociodemographics and School Characteristics on Students' Risk of Suspension.
  22. (2006). TEA Promotes New State Holiday, Texas Parents Day.
  23. (2013). School-based law enforcement.
  24. (2015). Federal Officials Visit Texas Community To Discuss Youth Issues.
  25. Fatma Sadik (2011). Children and Discipline: Investigating Secondary School Students’ Perception of Discipline through Metaphors.
  26. (2012). New data from U.S. Department of Education highlights educational inequities around teacher experience, discipline and high school rigor.
  27. (2014). Expansive survey of America's public schools reveals troubling racial disparities: Lack of access to pre-school, greater suspensions cited.
  28. (2015). School Safety and Effective Discipline.
  29. M Weissman (2015). Prelude to prison: Student perspectives on school suspension.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

John R. Slate. 2016. \u201cDifferences in Disciplinary Consequence for Texas Middle School Boys as a Function of Ethnicity/Raceand Economic Status\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 16 (GJHSS Volume 16 Issue G8): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 16 Issue G8
Pg. 43- 47
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-G Classification: FOR Code: 939999p
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 19, 2016

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3663
Total Downloads: 1829
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Examined in this study was the degree to which differences were present in Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP) placements for Grade 7 and 8 boys in Texas as a function of their ethnicity/race and economic status. Texas statewide middle school discipline data were obtained from the Texas Education Agency Public Education Information Management System on all boys in the 2010-2011 school year. Inferential statistical procedures revealed the presence of statistically significant differences in JJAEP placements forboys in both Grades 7 and 8 as a function of their economic status and ethnicity/race. In both Grade 7 and Grade 8, Black boys had statistically significantly higher percentage of JJAEP placements than their White counterparts, 3 to 4 times higher. For Hispanic boys in Grades 7 and 8, they had a JJAEP placement rate that was 2 to 3 times higher than the JJAEP placement rate of White boys.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Differences in Disciplinary Consequence for Texas Middle School Boys as a Function of Ethnicity/Raceand Economic Status

Christopher Eckford
Christopher Eckford
John R. Slate
John R. Slate Sam Houston State University

Research Journals