Does the Formal Structure of the Cash Flow Statement have an Impact on the Understanding of the Data Contained In the Report Explaining the Company and Financial Dynamics?

α
Maria Silvia Avi
Maria Silvia Avi
σ
Prof. Maria Silvia Avi
Prof. Maria Silvia Avi

Send Message

To: Author

Does the Formal Structure of the Cash Flow Statement have an Impact on the Understanding of the Data Contained In the Report Explaining the Company and Financial Dynamics?

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

C: FINANCEVW8H4

Does the Formal Structure of the Cash Flow Statement have an Impact on the Understanding of the Data Contained In the Report Explaining the Company and Financial Dynamics? Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The financial analysis of a company, implemented through ratios alone, can lead to making completely erroneous judgements about the dynamic development of the company’s income and expenditure. For this reason, cash flows and the statement that summarises them represent essential elements of the study of the company’s financial performance. Various international bodies have addressed this issue since, in most countries, the cash flow statement now identifies one of the elements that make up the financial reporting for the year, on par with the balance sheet and profit and loss. Here we will take a closer look at the central bodies that have addressed this issue and illustrate what has been said about cash flow and the cash flow statement by the American FASB, the IASB, the Italian Civil Code and the Italian Accounting Standards Board. As you will see, all of these bodies propose structures or examples of items requiring the highlighting and re-grouping of needs and sources into three aggregates: operating activities, investing activities and financing activities. Subsequently, we will point out that information limitations characterise these statements.

References

108 Cites in Article
  1. Arthur Adelberg (1979). A Methodology for Measuring the Understandability of Financial Report Messages.
  2. Arthur Adelberg (1983). The Accounting Syntactic Complexity Formula: A New Instrument for Predicting the Readability of Selected Accounting Communications.
  3. Arthur Adelberg,J Razek (1984). A Methodology for Measuring the Understandability of Financial Report Messages.
  4. W Albrecht,R Sack (2001). Accounting Education: Charting the Course Througha Perilous Future.
  5. D Alexander,A Britton,A Jorissen (2007). International financial reporting and analysis.
  6. David Alexander (1993). A European true and fair view?.
  7. David Alexander,Hans Schwencke (1997). Accounting change in Norway.
  8. David Alexander,Hans Schwencke (2003). Accounting change in Norway.
  9. D Alexander,E Jermakowicz (2006). A true and fair view of the principles/rules debate.
  10. D Alexander,C Nobes (2013). Financial accounting: an international introduction.
  11. N Ankarath,K Mehta,T Ghosh,Y Alkafaji (2010). Understanding IFRS Fundamentals.
  12. Avi (2017). Cost Volume Profit Analysis (CVP-Analysis).
  13. M Avi (2018). Understandability in Italian Financial Reporting and jail: a link lived dangerously.
  14. Wolfgang Ballwieser,G Bamberg,M Beckmann,H Bester,M Blickle,R Ewert,A Wagenhofer,M Gaynor (2012). Auditing in an Agency Setting.
  15. Annette Baines,Kim Langfield-Smith (2003). Antecedents to management accounting change: a structural equation approach.
  16. Mary Barth,Katherine Schipper (2008). Financial Reporting Transparency.
  17. Mary Barth (2014). Measurement in Financial Reporting: The Need for Concepts.
  18. E Barret,L Fraser (1977). Conflicting roles in budgeting for operations.
  19. Rachel Baskerville,Huw Rhys (2014). A Research Note on Understandability, Readability and Translatability of IFRS.
  20. F Beest,G Braam,S Boelens (2009). Quality of Financial Reporting: measuring qualitative characteristics.
  21. George Benston,Michael Bromwich,Robert Litan,Alfred Wagenhofer (2006). Worldwide Financial Reporting.
  22. G Boer (2000). Management Accounting Education: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.
  23. O Broome (2004). Statement of cash flows: Time for change!.
  24. Peter Bunce,Robin Fraser,Lionel Woodcock (1995). Advanced budgeting: a journey to advanced management systems.
  25. Stuart Burchell,Colin Clubb,Anthony Hopwood,John Hughes,Janine Nahapiet (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society.
  26. Stuart Burchell,Colin Clubb,Anthony Hopwood (1985). Accounting in its social context: Towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom.
  27. Simon Cadez,Chris Guilding (2008). An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting.
  28. Dennis Chambers,Thomas Linsmeier,Catherine Shakespeare,Theodore Sougiannis (2007). An evaluation of SFAS No. 130 comprehensive income disclosures.
  29. Robert Chenhall (2008). Accounting for the horizontal organization: A review essay.
  30. Chloe Kan,C (2021). Budget depreciation: when budgeting early increases spending.
  31. S Cristea,C Saccon (2008). Italy between applying national accounting standards and IAS/ IFRS.
  32. Mark Covaleski,Mark Dirsmith,Sajay Samuel (1996). Social Constructionist Research in Accounting: A Reflection on the Accounting Profession.
  33. M Covaleski,J Evans,Iii,J Luft,M Schields (2003). Budgeting research: Three theorical perspectives and criteria for selecti veintegration.
  34. Robert Deatherage (2021). Security on a Budget.
  35. Pascale Delvaille,Gabi Ebbers,Chiara Saccon (2005). International Financial Reporting Convergence: Evidence from Three Continental European Countries.
  36. Gus De Franco,S Kothari,Rodrigo Verdi (2011). The Benefits of Financial Statement Comparability.
  37. Roberto Di Pietra,Stuart Mcleay,Angelo Riccaboni (2001). Regulating Accounting Within the Political and Legal System.
  38. Christine Doxey (2021). The Controller's Toolkit.
  39. Bo‐göran Ekholm,Jan Wallin (2011). The Impact of Uncertainty and Strategy on the Perceived Usefulness of Fixed and Flexible Budgets.
  40. M Epstein,J-F And Manzoni,A Dávila (2005). Performance Measurement and Management Control: Innovative Concepts and Practices.
  41. M Epstein,J Manzoni (2010). Performance Measurement and Management Control: Innovative Concepts and Practices.
  42. Sid Ewer (2007). Transparency and Understandability, But for Whom?.
  43. Natalie Frow,David Marginson,Stuart Ogden (2010). “Continuous” budgeting: Reconciling budget flexibility with budgetary control.
  44. D Ghandour (2021). Analytical review of the current and future directions of management accounti and control system.
  45. A Gharairi (2020). Special Issue title page.
  46. Jayne Godfrey,Keryn Chalmers (2007). Globalisation of Accounting Standards: An Introduction.
  47. Jeremiah Green,Henock Louis,Jalal Sani (2022). Intangible Investments, Scaling, and the Trend in the Accrual–Cash Flow Association.
  48. Axel Haller (2002). Financial accounting developments in the European Union: past events and future prospects.
  49. A Haller,P Walton,B Raffournier,B (2003). International accounting.
  50. Axel Haller,Brigitte Eierle (2004). The Adaptation of German Accounting Rules to IFRS: A Legislative Balancing Act.
  51. J Hope,R Fraser (1997). Beyond budgeting… Breaking through the barrier to the third wave.
  52. J Hope,R Fraser (2000). Beyond budgeting.
  53. J Hope,R Fraser (2003). When Hope Falls Short: HOPE VI, Accountability, and the Privatization of Public Housing.
  54. A Hopwood,C Chapman,M Shields (2007). Handbook of management accounting research.
  55. Anthony Hopwood (2008). Changing Pressures on the Research Process: On Trying to Research in an Age when Curiosity is not Enough.
  56. Anthony Hopwood (2009). Accounting and the environment.
  57. Anthony Hopwood (2009). The economic crisis and accounting: Implications for the research community.
  58. A Hopper,J Burns,M Yazdifar (2004). Management accounting education and training: putting management in and taking accounting out.
  59. C Horngren,G Sundem,W Stratton (2013). Introduction to Management Accounting.
  60. M Hutauruk (2022). the effect of difference in accounting and fiscal profit, operating cash flow and liaoilities levels on earning persistency.
  61. Gregory Jonas,Jeannot Blanchet (2000). Assessing Quality of Financial Reporting.
  62. E Jaroszewicza (2022). Use of a deterministic cash flow model to support manager decisions.
  63. Michael Jensen (2001). Corporate Budgeting Is Broken, Let's Fix It.
  64. Jon-Arild Johannessen (2021). Continuous Change and Communication in Knowledge Management.
  65. Michael Jones,Malcolm Smith (2014). Traditional and alternative methods of measuring the understandability of accounting narratives.
  66. Robert Kaplan,Steven Anderson (2007). Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.
  67. Pamela Kent,Richard Kent,Robyn Mccormack,Julie‐anne Tarr (2022). Disclosure of liquidity and cash flow statements by Australian superannuation funds before Covid‐19.
  68. R Lewandoski,A Goncharuk,J Deforowsky (2020). Commercialization and Industry Perspective in the Era of Digitalization.
  69. Theresa Libby,R Lindsay (2010). Beyond budgeting or budgeting reconsidered? A survey of North-American budgeting practice.
  70. Bill Katz (2019). The Acquisitions Budget.
  71. Andreas Kuhnle,Jan-Philipp Kaiser,Felix Theiß,Nicole Stricker,Gisela Lanza (2021). Designing an adaptive production control system using reinforcement learning.
  72. M Lubis,M Dai,S Sitorus,I Muda (2022). The usefulness and format of the statement of cash flows based on IFRS.
  73. G Miller,W Hildreth,J Rabin (2019). Performance-Based Budgeting.
  74. Henry Mintzberg,James Waters (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent.
  75. A Moisello (2021). ABC: evolution, problems of implementation and organizational variaole.
  76. J Morton (1974). Qualitative Objectives of Financial Accounting: A Comment on Relevance and Understandability.
  77. Jan Mouritsen,Kristian Kreiner (2016). Accounting, decisions and promises.
  78. J Morrel (2018). How to Forecast: A Guide for Business.
  79. S Nillson (1997). Understandability of Narratives in Annual Reports.
  80. C Nobes,S Aisbitt (2001). The True and Fair Requirement in Recent National Implementations.
  81. C Nobes,M Gee,A Haller (2010). The Influence of Tax on IFRS Consolidated Statements.
  82. Christopher Nobes (2013). The continued survival of international differences under IFRS.
  83. C Nobes (2016). Towards an Assessment of Country Effects on IFRS Recognition Decisions and Measurement Estimations.
  84. C Nobes,R Parker (2016). Comparative International Accounting.
  85. Christopher Nobes,Christian Stadler (2015). The qualitative characteristics of financial information, and managers’ accounting decisions: evidence from IFRS policy changes.
  86. A Obaidat (2007). Comparative analysis of the perceived qualitative characteristics of accounting information under IFRS. Evidence from Algeria.
  87. D Oderlheide (2001). Transnational accounting.
  88. S Onushchenko,A Berezhna,Filonych (2021). Budget Mechanism: Methodological Approach to and the Practice of Budget Decentralization.
  89. Chris Patel,Ron Day (1996). THE INFLUENCE OF COGNITIVE STYLE ON THE UNDERSTANDABILITY OF A PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT BY ACCOUNTING STUDENTS.
  90. Sompong Pornupatham,Hun-Tong Tan,Thanyaluk Vichitsarawong,G Yoo (2022). The Effect of Cash Flow Presentation Method on Investors’ Forecast of Future Cash Flows.
  91. E Qydratovich (2022). Cash flow of the entrerprise: the essence and methods of their evaluation.
  92. M Rankin,P Stanton,S Mcgowan,K Ferlauto,M Tilling (2012). Contemporary Issues in Accounting.
  93. Lars Samuelson (1986). Discrepancies between the roles of budgeting.
  94. W Schoen (2004). International accounting standards -a 'starting point' for a common European taxbase.
  95. E Schorck,H Lefebre (2021). The good and the bad news about quality.
  96. R Simons (1995). Levers of Control.
  97. N Slighy,V Taffurelli,M Iber,A Doyle (2021). Budgeting Lesson and Stories.
  98. Malcolm Smith,Richard Taffler (1992). Readability and Understandability: Different Measures of the Textual Complexity of Accounting Narrative.
  99. Mariko Smith (2021). 'Who controls the past... controls the future':.
  100. M Steven,Floryt,J Phillips,Maurice Tassin,F (1992). Measuring readability: A comparison of accounting textbooks.
  101. W Schwaiger (2015). The REA Accounting Model: Enhancing Understandability and Applicability.
  102. Wim Van Der Stede,Wagenhofer (2000). The relationship between two consequences of budgetary controls: budgetary slack creation and managerial short-term orientation.
  103. Alfred Wagenhofer (2006). Management Accounting Research in German-Speaking Countries.
  104. A Wagenhoferb,R Göxa (2009). Optimal impairment rules.
  105. Jaroslav Wagner,Petr Petera,Boris Popesko,Petr Novák,Karel Šafr (2021). Usefulness of the budget: the mediating effect of participative budgeting and budget-based evaluation and rewarding.
  106. T Webster,G Yee (2021). Web based energy information and control systems.
  107. Aaron Wildavsky (2017). Budgeting and Governing.
  108. S Zeff (2013). The objectives of financial reporting: a historical survey and analysis.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Maria Silvia Avi. 2026. \u201cDoes the Formal Structure of the Cash Flow Statement have an Impact on the Understanding of the Data Contained In the Report Explaining the Company and Financial Dynamics?\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance GJMBR-C Volume 22 (GJMBR Volume 22 Issue C5): .

Download Citation

Detailed analysis of cash flow statement effects.
Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 22 Issue C5
Pg. 21- 50
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-C Classification: DDC Code: 658.15224 LCC Code: HD30.28
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 26, 2022

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1545
Total Downloads: 60
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The financial analysis of a company, implemented through ratios alone, can lead to making completely erroneous judgements about the dynamic development of the company’s income and expenditure. For this reason, cash flows and the statement that summarises them represent essential elements of the study of the company’s financial performance. Various international bodies have addressed this issue since, in most countries, the cash flow statement now identifies one of the elements that make up the financial reporting for the year, on par with the balance sheet and profit and loss. Here we will take a closer look at the central bodies that have addressed this issue and illustrate what has been said about cash flow and the cash flow statement by the American FASB, the IASB, the Italian Civil Code and the Italian Accounting Standards Board. As you will see, all of these bodies propose structures or examples of items requiring the highlighting and re-grouping of needs and sources into three aggregates: operating activities, investing activities and financing activities. Subsequently, we will point out that information limitations characterise these statements.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Does the Formal Structure of the Cash Flow Statement have an Impact on the Understanding of the Data Contained In the Report Explaining the Company and Financial Dynamics?

Prof. Maria Silvia Avi
Prof. Maria Silvia Avi

Research Journals