Does the Status Quo Affect the Private Equity Investment Decisions?

Does the Status Quo Affect the Private Equity Investment Decisions?

Oumeima Toumia

Contact

Sana El Harbi

Contact

Does the Status Quo Affect the Private Equity Investment Decisions?

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

P11FH

Does the Status Quo Affect the Private Equity Investment Decisions? Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Despite the huge literature that has been carried to investigate the determinants of the private equity market, studies examining the extent of the SQB in the private equity investments’ decisions are missing. Our regressions are based on a data set that covers 24 OECD members’ countries from 2007 to 2015. We discovered the absence of a link between the SQB and the choice of private equity investments. However, the added value by activity, the private equity country attractiveness index, and the research & development expenditures have a significant impact on the choice of the investment sector. Thus, private equity investors are considered rational decision-makers compared to individuals. The crucial role of the status quo has been shown in many fields. Nevertheless, whether this bias affects the private equity investment decision at the country level remains unanswered by prior research.

References

75 Cites in Article

Reference Format

V Agarwal,N Daniel,N Naik (2003). performance, and managerial incentives in the hedge fund industry.
Julie Agnew,Pierluigi Balduzzi,Annika Sundén (2003). Portfolio Choice and Trading in a Large 401(k) Plan.
Ron Antonczyk,Astrid Salzmann (2014). Overconfidence and optimism: The effect of national culture on capital structure.
Brad Barber,Terrance Odean,Lu Zheng (2005). Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The Effects of Expenses on Mutual Fund Flows*.
Nicholas Barberis,Richard Thaler (2003). Chapter 18 A survey of behavioral finance.
A Belke,R Fehn,N Foster (2003). Does Venture Capital Investment Spur Employment Growth?-Further Evidence.
David Bell (1982). Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty.
Kerstin Bernoth,Roberta Colavecchio (2014). The macroeconomic determinants of private equity investment: a European comparison.
Shai Bernstein,Josh Lerner,Morten Sorensen,Per Strömberg (2016). Private Equity and Industry Performance.
U Bindl,S Parker (2017). New perspectives and directions for understanding proactivity in organizations.
B Black,R Gilson (1998). Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: banks versus stock markets.
Nicholas Bloom,Raffaella Sadun,John Van Reenen (2015). Do Private Equity Owned Firms Have Better Management Practices?.
C Bohlmann,H Zacher (2020). Making Things Happen (Un) Expectedly: Interactive Effects of Age, Gender, and Motives on Evaluations of Proactive Behavior.
Stefano Bonini,Senem Alkan (2012). The political and legal determinants of venture capital investments around the world.
Katrin Burmeister,Christian Schade (2007). Are entrepreneurs' decisions more biased? An experimental investigation of the susceptibility to status quo bias.
Lowell Busenitz,Jay Barney (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making.
William Bygrave,Jeffry Timmons (1992). Venture capital: predictions and outcomes. Venture Capital at the Crossroads and Realizing Investment Value revisited.
F Cangiano,S Parker,G Yeo (2019). Does daily proactivity affect well-being? The moderating role of punitive supervision.
Henrik Cronqvist,Richard Thaler (2004). Design Choices in Privatized Social-Security Systems: Learning from the Swedish Experience.
Dirk De Clercq,Vance Fried,Oskari Lehtonen,Harry Sapienza (2006). An Entrepreneur's Guide to the Venture Capital Galaxy.
Niklas Elert,Magnus Henrekson,Mikael Stenkula (2017). Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the European Union—A Reform Agenda.
Dirk Engel,Max Keilbach (2007). Firm-level implications of early stage venture capital investment — An empirical investigation.
Elisabete Félix,Cesaltina Pires,Mohamed Gulamhussen (2013). The Determinants of Venture Capital in Europe — Evidence Across Countries.
G Liang,N Prowse,S (1997). The private equity market: An overview.
Nikolaus Franke,Marc Gruber,Dietmar Harhoff,Joachim Henkel (2006). What you are is what you like—similarity biases in venture capitalists' evaluations of start-up teams.
Markus Freiburg,Dietmar Grichnik (2013). Institutional Reinvestments in Private Equity Funds as a Double-Edged Sword: The Role of the Status Quo Bias.
Qiang Fu,Ming Li (2014). Reputation-concerned policy makers and institutional status quo bias.
James Gaede,James Meadowcroft (2016). A Question of Authenticity: Status Quo Bias and the International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook.
S Ghai,C Kehoe,G Pinkus (2014). Private equity: Changing perceptions and new realities.
P Gompers (1994). The rise and fall of venture capital in New Zealand: Martin Perry.
Paul Gompers,Steven Kaplan,Vladimir Mukharlyamov (2016). What do private equity firms say they do?.
Paul Gompers,Josh Lerner,Margaret Blair,Thomas Hellmann (1998). What Drives Venture Capital Fundraising?.
Paul Gompers,Josh Lerner (2001). The Venture Capital Revolution.
Michael Gorman,William Sahlman (1989). What do venture capitalists do?.
A Groh,H Von Liechtenstein,K Lieser (2010). The European venture capital and private equity country attractiveness indices.
S Harbi,O Toumia (2020). The status quo and the investment decisions.
R Hartman,M Doane,C-K Woo (1991). Consumer Rationality and the Status Quo.
Thomas Hellmann,Manju Puri (2000). The Interaction between Product Market and Financing Strategy: The Role of Venture Capital.
Yao-Don Hung,Ming-Hone Tsai (2017). Value Creation and Value Transfer of Leveraged Buyouts: A Review of Recent Developments and Challenges for Emerging Markets.
Eric Johnson,John Hershey,Jacqueline Meszaros,Howard Kunreuther (1993). Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions.
Daniel Kahneman,Amos Tversky (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.
R Kelly (2012). Drivers of private equity investment activity: are buyout and venture investors really so different?.
Alexander Kempf,Stefan Ruenzi (2006). Status Quo Bias and the Number of Alternatives: An Empirical Illustration from the Mutual Fund Industry.
P Kennedy (1992). A Guide to Econometrics.
N Khan,Q She,L Zhang,I Ahmad (2018). Does Venture Capital Investment Spur Innovation? Cross Countries Analysis.
Timur Kuran (2009). Explaining the economic trajectories of civilizations: The systemic approach.
Henry Lahr,Andrea Mina (2016). Venture capital investments and the technological performance of portfolio firms.
Josh Lerner (1995). Venture Capitalists and the Oversight of Private Firms.
J Lerner (2000). Assessing the contribution of venture capital.
Ross Levine (1997). Financial Development and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda.
Yong Li,Ilan Vertinsky,Jing Li (2014). National distances, international experience, and venture capital investment performance.
Miona Milosevic (2018). Skills or networks? Success and fundraising determinants in a low performing venture capital market.
B Madrian,D Shea (2001). The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior.
D Marquaridt (1970). Generalized Inverses, Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation, and Nonlinear Estimation.
Yixi Ning,Wei Wang,Bo Yu (2015). The driving forces of venture capital investments.
R O'brien (2007). A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors.
Leslie Palich,D Ray Bagby (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom.
J Patel,R Zeckhauser,D Hendricks (1994). Investment flows and performance: Evidence from mutual funds, cross-border investments, and new issues.
Mihai Precup (2015). Challenges to Scaling Sustainable Private Equity Markets in Emerging Europe.
M Puri,R Zarutskie (2012). On the life cycle dynamics of venture-capital-and non-venture-capital -financed firms.
Sampsa Samila,Olav Sorenson (2011). Venture Capital, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth.
William Samuelson,Richard Zeckhauser (1988). Status quo bias in decision making.
Serena Sandri,Christian Schade,Oliver Mußhoff,Martin Odening (2010). Holding on for too long? An experimental study on inertia in entrepreneurs’ and non-entrepreneurs’ disinvestment choices.
Harry Sapienza (1992). When do venture capitalists add value?.
Maurice Schweitzer (1995). Multiple Reference Points, Framing, and the Status Quo Bias in Health Care Financing Decisions.
Armin Schwienbacher (2008). Innovation and Venture Capital Exits*.
Scott Seibert,Maria Kraimer,J Crant (2001). WHAT DO PROACTIVE PEOPLE DO? A LONGITUDINAL MODEL LINKING PROACTIVE PERSONALITY AND CAREER SUCCESS.
H Shefrin (2001). Behavioral corporate finance.
Sharon Parker,Uta Bindl,Karoline Strauss (2010). Making Things Happen: A Model of Proactive Motivation.
Sharon Parker,Catherine Collins (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors.
Sharon Parker,Helen Williams,Nick Turner (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work..
J Patel,R Zeckhauser,D Hendricks (1991). The rationality struggle: Illustrations from financial markets.
Bülent Tekçe,Neslihan Yılmaz,Recep Bildik (2016). What factors affect behavioral biases? Evidence from Turkish individual stock investors.
J Thompson (2005). Proactive personality and job performance: a social capital perspective.
J Thomas,D Whitman,C Viswesvaran (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Oumeima Toumia. 2021. \u201cDoes the Status Quo Affect the Private Equity Investment Decisions?\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 21 (GJMBR Volume 21 Issue A6).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 21 Issue A6

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-A Classification JEL Code: D63

Submission ReceivedSeptember 13, 2021
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted October 5, 2021
Published October 15, 2021

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 23, 2021

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 2042

Total Downloads: 971

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]