Dynamic Vs Static Term-Expansion using Semantic Resources in Information Retrieval

α
Ramakrishna kolikipogu
Ramakrishna kolikipogu B.Tech-Computer Science and Information Technology M.Tech-Computer Science with Software Engineering Ph.D - Computer Science and Engineering (About to Complete)
σ
Padmaja Rani B
Padmaja Rani B
α Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad

Send Message

To: Author

Dynamic Vs Static Term-Expansion using Semantic Resources in Information Retrieval

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDE5S89Q

Dynamic Vs Static Term-Expansion using Semantic Resources in Information Retrieval Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Information Retrieval in a Telugu language is upcoming area of research. Telugu is one of the recognized Indian languages. We present a novel approach in reformulating item terms at the time of crawling and indexing. The idea is not new, but use of synset and other lexical resources in Indian languages context has limitations due to unavailability of language resources. We prepared a synset for 1,43,001 root words out of 4,83,670 unique words from training corpus of 3500 documents during indexing. Index time document expansion gave improved recall ratio, when compared to base line approach i.e. simple information retrieval without term expansion at both the ends. We studied the effect of query terms expansion at search time using synset and compared with simple information retrieval process without expansion, recall is greatly affected and improved. We further extended this work by expanding terms in two sides and plotted results, which resemble recall growth. Surprisingly all expansions are showing improvement in recall and little fall in precision. We argue that expansion of terms at any level may cause inverse effect on precision. Necessary care is required while expanding documents or queries with help of language resources like Synset, WordNet and other resources.

References

27 Cites in Article
  1. Bodo Billerbeck,Justin Zobel (2005). Document Expansion versus Query Expansion for Ad-hoc Retrieval 10th Australasian Document Computing Symposium.
  2. Ramakrishna Kolikipogu,B Rani,Vijayalakshmi Kakulapati (2012). Reformulation of Telugu web query using word semantic relationships.
  3. (1092). The 2002 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence.
  4. R Baeza-Yates,B Ribeiro-Neto (1999). Modern Information Retrieval.
  5. S Dominich (2001). Mathematical Foundations of Information Retrieval.
  6. Dan Moldovan,Rada Mihalcea (1998). Improving the Search on the Internet by using Word Net and Lexical operators.
  7. M Maron,J Kuhns (1960). On Relevance, Probabilistic Indexing and Information Retrieval.
  8. J Rocchio (1971). Relevance feedback in information retrieval.
  9. Ian Ruthven (2003). Re-examining the potential effectiveness of interactive query expansion.
  10. Claudio Carpineto,Gioovanni Romano (2012). Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval.
  11. Chengxiang Zhai,John Lafferty (2001). Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval.
  12. Bin Tan,Atulya Velivelli,Hui Fang,Chengxiang Zhai (2007). Term feedback for information retrieval with language models.
  13. Bodo Billerbeck,Justin Jobel (2005). Document Expansion versus Query Expansion for Ad-hoc Retrieval.
  14. G Salton (1971). The SMART Retrieval System.
  15. J Xu,W Croft (2000). Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis.
  16. Jinxi Xu,W Croft (1996). Query expansion using local and global document analysis.
  17. F Scholer,H Williams,A Turpin (1971). Query association surrogates for web search.
  18. George Furnas,S Deerwester,S Dumais,T Landauer,R Harshman,L Streeter,K Lochbaum (1988). Information retrieval using a singular value decomposition model of latent semantic structure.
  19. R Attar,A Fraenkel (1977). Local Feedback in FW-Text Retrieval Systems.
  20. W Croft,D Harper (1979). USING PROBABILISTIC MODELS OF DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL WITHOUT RELEVANCE INFORMATION.
  21. Dr Kolikipogu Ramakrishna,Rani Padmaja (2010). Information Retrieval in Indian Languages: Query Expansion models for Telugu language as a case study.
  22. Yang Xu,Gareth Jones,Bin Wang (2009). Query dependent pseudo-relevance feedback based on wikipedia.
  23. Chris Buckley,Gerard Salton,James Allan,Amit Singhal (1994). Automatic Query Expansion Using SMART: TREC 3.
  24. Renxu Sun,Chai-Huat Ong,Tat-Seng Chua (2006). Mining dependency relations for query expansion in passage retrieval.
  25. C Manning,P Raghavan,H Sch Utze (2009). An introduction to information retrieval.
  26. Akshar Bharati,Vineet Chaitanya,Rajeev Sangal (2010). Natural Language Processing: A Paninian Perspective.
  27. Ramakrishna Kolikipogu,Padmaja Rani,B (2013). Study of Indexing Techniques to Improve the Performance of Information Retrieval in Telugu Language.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ramakrishna kolikipogu. 2013. \u201cDynamic Vs Static Term-Expansion using Semantic Resources in Information Retrieval\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 13 (GJCST Volume 13 Issue C4): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJCST Volume 13 Issue C4
Pg. 25- 31
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 2, 2013

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 9412
Total Downloads: 2545
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Information Retrieval in a Telugu language is upcoming area of research. Telugu is one of the recognized Indian languages. We present a novel approach in reformulating item terms at the time of crawling and indexing. The idea is not new, but use of synset and other lexical resources in Indian languages context has limitations due to unavailability of language resources. We prepared a synset for 1,43,001 root words out of 4,83,670 unique words from training corpus of 3500 documents during indexing. Index time document expansion gave improved recall ratio, when compared to base line approach i.e. simple information retrieval without term expansion at both the ends. We studied the effect of query terms expansion at search time using synset and compared with simple information retrieval process without expansion, recall is greatly affected and improved. We further extended this work by expanding terms in two sides and plotted results, which resemble recall growth. Surprisingly all expansions are showing improvement in recall and little fall in precision. We argue that expansion of terms at any level may cause inverse effect on precision. Necessary care is required while expanding documents or queries with help of language resources like Synset, WordNet and other resources.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Dynamic Vs Static Term-Expansion using Semantic Resources in Information Retrieval

Ramakrishna kolikipogu
Ramakrishna kolikipogu Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad
Padmaja Rani B
Padmaja Rani B

Research Journals