Effect of Particle Concentration and Sliding Velocity in Magnetic Abrasive Finishing of Brass Pipe

Effect of Particle Concentration and Sliding Velocity in Magnetic Abrasive Finishing of Brass Pipe

Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan

Contact

Saurav Arora

Contact

α RIMT University

Effect of Particle Concentration and Sliding Velocity in Magnetic Abrasive Finishing of Brass Pipe

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

A4U5Y

Effect of Particle Concentration and Sliding Velocity in Magnetic Abrasive Finishing of Brass Pipe Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The present study investigates the influence of magnetic field on the internal surface finish of Brass UNS C26800 pipe. The input parameters such as sliding velocity of electromagnets, concentration ratio (castor oil and magnetic abrasive particles) and number of cycles were varied in the selected range and their effect was comprehended in terms of percentage change in surface finish (%ΔRa). The remaining process parameters were kept constant throughout the experimentation. According to the results, % ΔRa initially increases and afterwards decreases with an increase in sliding velocity of electromagnets in case of concentration ratio 7:3 and 8:2. But, in case of concentration ratio 9:1, there is uniform increase in %ΔRa with an increase in sliding velocity. Also, at low sliding velocities (0.62 mm/sec and 1.23 mm/sec), the %ΔRa decreases with an increase in concentration ratio but at 2.46 mm/sec, the %ΔRa increases with increase in amount of oil added.

References

14 Cites in Article

Reference Format

K Boparai,G Thukral,J Chohan (2017). Effect of Abrasive (Fe 3 O 4 ) Particle Size on the Surface Roughness of Aluminium (A6063) Pipe using Magnetic Assisted Finishing.
Prateek Kala,Pulak Pandey (2014). Experimental Study on Finishing Forces in Double Disk Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Process While Finishing Paramagnetic Workpiece.
M Givi,A Tehrani,A Mohammadi (2012). Polishing of the aluminum sheets with magnetic abrasive finishing method.
H Yamaguchi,T Shinmura (1999). Study of the surface modification resulting from an internal magnetic abrasive finishing process.
Talwinder Bedi,Anant Singh (2015). Magnetorheological methods for nanofinishing – a review.
S Jha,V Jain (2004). Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process.
(1997). Geometrical Product Specification (GPS) -Surface Texture: Profile Method -Terms, Definition and Surface Texture Parameters, International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
V Mishra,H Goel,R Mulik,P Pandey (2013). Determining work-brush 9. interface temperature in magnetic abrasive finishing process.
F Djavanroodi (2013). Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Surface Roughness in Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Process.
Sehijpal Singh,H Shan,Pradeep Kumar (2008). Experimental Studies on Mechanism of Material Removal in Abrasive Flow Machining Process.
Mahadev Patil,Kamlesh Chandra,P Misra (2012). Study of Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Using Mechanically Alloyed Magnetic Abrasives.
M Sharma,D Singh (2013). To Study the Effect of Various Parameters on Magnetic Abrasive Finishing.
V Jain,Prashant Kumar,P Behera,S Jayswal (2001). Effect of working gap and circumferential speed on the performance of magnetic abrasive finishing process.
Girish Verma,Prateek Kala,Pulak Pandey (2016). Experimental investigations into internal magnetic abrasive finishing of pipes.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan. 2017. \u201cEffect of Particle Concentration and Sliding Velocity in Magnetic Abrasive Finishing of Brass Pipe\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics GJRE-A Volume 17 (GJRE Volume 17 Issue A2): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 17 Issue A2
Pg. 57- 63

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-A Classification: FOR Code: 290501

Submission ReceivedDecember 9, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2016
Published January 15, 2017

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 31, 2017

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics

Authors: Saurav Arora, Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 215

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3494

Total Downloads (simulated): 1713

Publish Date: 2017 07, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 58 views
Month 2: 62 views
Month 3: 17 views
Month 4: 24 views
Month 5: 33 views
Month 6: 26 views
Month 7: 23 views
Month 8: 42 views
Month 9: 33 views
Month 10: 20 views
Month 11: 34 views
Month 12: 46 views
Month 13: 20 views
Month 14: 28 views
Month 15: 24 views
Month 16: 17 views
Month 17: 41 views
Month 18: 35 views
Month 19: 35 views
Month 20: 34 views
Month 21: 42 views
Month 22: 32 views
Month 23: 37 views
Month 24: 16 views
Month 25: 16 views
Month 26: 19 views
Month 27: 25 views
Month 28: 30 views
Month 29: 20 views
Month 30: 28 views
Month 31: 36 views
Month 32: 21 views
Month 33: 43 views
Month 34: 20 views
Month 35: 35 views
Month 36: 33 views
Month 37: 34 views
Month 38: 41 views
Month 39: 30 views
Month 40: 38 views
Month 41: 21 views
Month 42: 34 views
Month 43: 41 views
Month 44: 24 views
Month 45: 29 views
Month 46: 25 views
Month 47: 14 views
Month 48: 25 views
Month 49: 11 views
Month 50: 43 views
Month 51: 16 views
Month 52: 38 views
Month 53: 35 views
Month 54: 26 views
Month 55: 25 views
Month 56: 36 views
Month 57: 44 views
Month 58: 26 views
Month 59: 39 views
Month 60: 29 views
Month 61: 22 views
Month 62: 32 views
Month 63: 38 views
Month 64: 23 views
Month 65: 32 views
Month 66: 33 views
Month 67: 35 views
Month 68: 29 views
Month 69: 30 views
Month 70: 38 views
Month 71: 26 views
Month 72: 39 views
Month 73: 34 views
Month 74: 35 views
Month 75: 44 views
Month 76: 41 views
Month 77: 26 views
Month 78: 49 views
Month 79: 28 views
Month 80: 38 views
Month 81: 25 views
Month 82: 24 views
Month 83: 45 views
Month 84: 24 views
Month 85: 13 views
Month 86: 34 views
Month 87: 35 views
Month 88: 31 views
Month 89: 33 views
Month 90: 35 views
Month 91: 14 views
Month 92: 20 views
Month 93: 40 views
Month 94: 26 views
Month 95: 30 views
Month 96: 44 views
Month 97: 48 views
Month 98: 36 views
Month 99: 28 views
Month 100: 31 views
Month 101: 24 views
Month 102: 40 views
Month 103: 45 views
Month 104: 48 views
Month 105: 43 views

Total Views: 3494

Total Downloads: 1713

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]