Effectiveness of the Exogegenous and Endogenous Variables as Determinants of Money Supply in Nigeria: 1980-2019.

1
okorontah_chikeziem_f
okorontah_chikeziem_f
2
Okorontah Chikeziem F
Okorontah Chikeziem F

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 21 Issue C1

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

C: FINANCE260CQ

Effectiveness of the Exogegenous and Endogenous Variables as Determinants of Money Supply in Nigeria: 1980-2019. Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This work dealt on the effectiveness of the exogenous and endogenous variables as determinants of money supply in Nigeria. It is a contribution to the existing debate on money supply exogeniety/endogeneity concepts. To examine these issues, this work adopted two models and used annual time-series data for the period 1980 to 2019. It employed the ordinary least square (OLS) technique, the unit root test, the Johansson co-integration procedure and the error correction mechanism (ECM) to analyse the data. Most variables in the models were significant and rightly signed. From the exogenous model, Treasury Bill Rate (TBR), Monetary Policy rate (MPR) and Liquidity ratio (LQ) significantly impacted to changes in money supply in the short run. But in the long run analysis only TBR was found to be significant and impacted positively to changes in money supply. The result indicated a low coefficient of determination (R2) and weak disequilibrium adjustment value (in the long run) depicting weak exogeniety and less effective.

38 Cites in Articles

References

  1. M Ail,A Islam (2010). Money Supply Function for Bangladesh: An Empirical Analysis.
  2. D Akpan (2008). Financial intermediation and economic growth.
  3. Arkadiusz Sceron (2019). Endogenous versus Exogenous money: Does the debate really matter?.
  4. A Bakara (2011). an empirical study of the determinants of money supply growth and its effects on inflation rate in Nigeria.
  5. K Brunner (1968). Operations of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis—1967.
  6. (1987). Annual Report and statement of Account for the years ended 31 st December 1987.
  7. Cbn (2007). CBN Act 2007, Federal Republic of Nigeria official gazetle.
  8. Cbn (2016). Unknown Title.
  9. Dr. Lawrence (2017). Does CBN Intervention Funds Contribute to Inflationary Pressure in Nigeria? An Empirical Investigation.
  10. Cbn (2019). Central Bank of Nigeria.
  11. Luiz Cerqueira (2009). An approach to testing the exogeneity of the money supply in Brazil by mixing Kalman filter and cointegration procedures: 1964.02 to 1986.02.
  12. H Ching (2011). Fully Backed Central Bank Money.
  13. O Elhendway (2015). Money Supply-Exogenous or Endogenous? An Empirical Evidence from Egypt.
  14. Milton Friedman (1968). Quantity Theory of Money.
  15. T Falah,A Ahmed (2017). Money supply Endogenous or Exogenous Variable? With reference to Iraq: www.
  16. Athanasios Geromichalos,Lucas Herrenbrueck,Sukjoon Lee (2015). The strategic determination of the supply of liquid assets.
  17. C Granger (1969). Investigating causal Relations by Econometric models and Cross spectral methods.
  18. P Georg,M Pasche (2010). Endogenous money on Banking Behaviour in New and Post -Keynesian model.
  19. F Kaplan,S Gungor (2015). The Relationship between Money Supply, Interest Rate and Inflation Rate: an Endogeneity-Exogeneity Approach.
  20. C Khetan (1973). A quarterly econometric model of the Indian monetary sector.
  21. C Kothari,G Garg (2014). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (3 nd Edition).
  22. A Meltzer (1938). the Behaviour of the French money supply.
  23. Hyman Minsky (1977). The Financial Instability Hypothesis: An Interpretation of Keynes and an Alternative to“Standard” Theory.
  24. (2016). National Bureau of Standards (NBS).
  25. Sabri Nayan,Norsiah Kadir,Abdul Yusof,Noor Ali (2010). Money Supply Endogeneity: Evidence from the Dynamic Panel Data.
  26. Kevin Nell (1999). The Endogenous/Exogenous Nature of South Africa’s Money Supply Under Direct and Indirect Monetary Control Measures.
  27. A Orodho (2003). Essentials of Educational and Social Science Research method: qualitative and qualitative Approach; Narobi.
  28. T Palley (1993). competing views of the money supply process: theory and evidence: New York: New School for Social Resources.
  29. T Palley (2008). Endogenous money: Implication for the money supply process.
  30. R Paul (2002). Money, Banking and International trade.
  31. Robert Pollin (2008). Interest rate exogeneity: theory, evidence and policy issues for the U.S. economy.
  32. Louis-Philippe Rochon,Sergio Rossi (2006). Endogenous money: the evolutionary versus revolutionary views.
  33. N; Saabi,K Norsiah,H Abdul,A Noor (2015). Post Keynesian Theory and Evidence of Money Supply Endogeneity: A Review Essay.
  34. J Tobia (1971). Commercial Banks as Creators of Money" Amsterdem: North Holland.
  35. O Uchandu (2009). Overview of Monetary Policy in Nigeria.
  36. J Wooldridge (2006). Introductory Econometrics; A modern Approach.
  37. E Zatual,M B; Ahmed,A Mohamed (2009). money supply behaviour in emerging economy, a comparative Analysis.
  38. M Wadud (2000). Cointegration and Error correlation models in estimating causality between export and economic growth in Bangladesh.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

okorontah_chikeziem_f. 2021. \u201cEffectiveness of the Exogegenous and Endogenous Variables as Determinants of Money Supply in Nigeria: 1980-2019.\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance GJMBR-C Volume 21 (GJMBR Volume 21 Issue C1): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 21 Issue C1
Pg. 17- 29
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-C Classification: JEL Code: F65
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 16, 2021

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2145
Total Downloads: 990
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

This work dealt on the effectiveness of the exogenous and endogenous variables as determinants of money supply in Nigeria. It is a contribution to the existing debate on money supply exogeniety/endogeneity concepts. To examine these issues, this work adopted two models and used annual time-series data for the period 1980 to 2019. It employed the ordinary least square (OLS) technique, the unit root test, the Johansson co-integration procedure and the error correction mechanism (ECM) to analyse the data. Most variables in the models were significant and rightly signed. From the exogenous model, Treasury Bill Rate (TBR), Monetary Policy rate (MPR) and Liquidity ratio (LQ) significantly impacted to changes in money supply in the short run. But in the long run analysis only TBR was found to be significant and impacted positively to changes in money supply. The result indicated a low coefficient of determination (R2) and weak disequilibrium adjustment value (in the long run) depicting weak exogeniety and less effective.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Effectiveness of the Exogegenous and Endogenous Variables as Determinants of Money Supply in Nigeria: 1980-2019.

Okorontah Chikeziem F
Okorontah Chikeziem F

Research Journals