Effects of Government Programs on Food Acquisition for Family Farming: The Cooperative Seed between Brazil-Africa

Effects of Government Programs on Food Acquisition for Family Farming: The Cooperative Seed between Brazil-Africa

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

K9JDO

Effects of Government Programs on Food Acquisition for Family Farming: The Cooperative Seed between Brazil-Africa Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Within the limits of the institutionalization of the National Program for Strengthening Family Agriculture (PRONAF), the National School Feeding Program (PNAE) and the participation of Brazil in the Food Acquisition Program for Africa (PPA). The main objective of this work was to share the best practices in the implementation of school feeding programs as an important social protection tool to fight hunger, contributing to the exchange of information between countries, their farmers to take advantage of the “desert drought” and cooperatives. The methodology applied in the present research consists of a qualitative and descriptive bibliographical research, in order to obtain the necessary data for the accomplishment of the research objectives, where interviews with different social actors working directly with the institutionalization of the PNAE, PRONAF and the PAA Africa program is an initiative of the Brazilian government in partnership with the World Food Program (WFP), FAO (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization) and DFID (UK Department for International Development to promote food security and empowerment by On the other hand, the agents directly linked to the farmers showed the subject and questioned this research, but did not reveal any action that could reverse the absence of farmers in public calls.

References

52 Cites in Article
  1. 1. A Buainain,J Garcia (2013). CGEE. The small rural production and the trends of the Brazilian agrarian development: to buy time is possible? Brasília. CGEE. The small rural production and the trends of the Brazilian agrarian development: to buy time is possible? Brasília
  2. 2. (2012). State of School Feeding in Latin America and the Caribbean: 2022. Brazilian family agriculture in the National School Feeding Program: market guarantee for farmers and food and nutritional security for students in the public school system
  3. 3. G Bittencourt,R Abramovay (2013). Institutional innovations in financing family farming: the Cresol System. RevistaEconomiaEnsaios, 16(1)
  4. 4. G Bittencourt (2002). Family agriculture and agribusiness: research questions. Innovations in the traditions of family agriculture
  5. 5. (2016). National Program for Strengthening Family Agriculture -PronafInvestimento. National Program for Strengthening Family Agriculture -PronafInvestimento
  6. 6. V Mymrin,K Carvalho,F Passig,J Filho,R Catai (1988). Physico-chemical processes of environmentally friendly ceramics formation by hazardous electroplating and automotive industry waste application. Bulletin of Russian academy of natural sciences, 25(1), 85-96.
  7. 7. Brazil (1965). Presidency of the Republic of Brazil. Law, 4, 829.
  8. 8. Brazil (2006). Civil Code of the Federative Republic of Brazil (2002). Modernising Civil Liability Law in Europe, China, Brazil and Russia, 197-213.
  9. 9. Brazil (2009). Federative Republic of Brazil - Social Insurance and Labor Supply : Assessing Incentives and Redistribution. Law, 11, 947.
  10. 10. Flávio Sacco Dos Anjos,Nádia Velleda Caldas (2011). Crédito agrario y agricultura familiar en brasil. Análisis de la morosidad en la aplicación del programa nacional de fortalecimiento de la agricultura nacional. Revista de Fomento Social, 793-816.
  11. 11. Brazil (2009). Resolution / CD / FNDE nº 38. Resolution / CD / FNDE nº 38
  12. 12. Brazil (2013). U.S. and Russian Officials Respond to NSA Leaks: June 26, June 28, and September 4, 2013. Historic Documents of 2013, 329-338.
  13. 13. M Carneiro (2000). Family farmers and pluriactivity: typologies and policies. Family farmers and pluriactivity: typologies and policies
  14. 14. Viviane Franco,Karine Zortéa,Paulo De Abreu (2011). Obesity and Clozapine use in Schizophrenia. Obesity Research - Open Journal, 3(2), 24-29.
  15. 15. F Dal-Soglio (2013). Development, agriculture and agroecology: what is the link?. Sustainable rural development in northern and southern Brazil
  16. 16. R Denardi (2014). Family Agriculture and public policies: some dilemmas and challenges for sustainable rural development. Family Agriculture and public policies: some dilemmas and challenges for sustainable rural development
  17. 17. R Denardi (1999). Public Policy and Family Agriculture: a reading of PRONAF. Public Policy and Family Agriculture: a reading of PRONAF
  18. 18. M Dalfovo,R Lana,A Silveira Quantitative and qualitative methods: a theoretical rescue. Applied Scientific Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(4), 1-13.
  19. 19. J Fogaça (2016). Agriculture and Sustainable Development. Agriculture and Sustainable Development
  20. 20. (1996). Profile of family agriculture in Brazil: statistical dossier. Profile of family agriculture in Brazil: statistical dossier
  21. 21. Cléria Figueredo,Christian Silva (1994). Política de Reforma Agrária e o Processo de Titulação no Incra: Uma Análise na Superintendência de Santa Catarina/Agrarian reform policy and the titling process at Incra: an analysis at the Santa Catarina Superintendence. Informe GEPEC, 24(2), 275-296.
  22. 22. (2013). Food an Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Fao Strategy For Associations With Civil Society Organizations, 1-32.
  23. 23. (2013). Right to Food and Food and Nutrition Security in the CPLP Countries. Right to Food and Food and Nutrition Security in the CPLP Countries, 1-68.
  24. 24. D Garcia-Filho (2000). Diagnostic analysis of agrarian systems: methodological guide. Diagnostic analysis of agrarian systems: methodological guide
  25. 25. Catia Grisa,Valdemar Wesz Junior,Vitor Buchweitz (2014). Revisitando o Pronaf: velhos questionamentos, novas interpretações. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 52(2), 323-346.
  26. 26. M Del-Grossi,J Graziano-Da-Silva (2002). Novo Rural: AnEnlightened Approach. Novo Rural: AnEnlightened Approach, II, 49.
  27. 27. J Guilhoto,C Azzoni,F Silveira (2007). GDP of Family Agriculture: Brazil -States. GDP of Family Agriculture: Brazil -States
  28. 28. Fernando Cavallieri,Fabrício De Oliveira (2016). Novas estimativas do IBGE para a população do Rio de Janeiro. Coleção Estudos Cariocas, 8(1), 113.
  29. 29. E Lakatos,M Marconi,A De (1991). Methodology of Scientific Work: Basic procedures, bibliographical research, project and report. Methodology of Scientific Work: Basic procedures, bibliographical research, project and report
  30. 30. H Lamarche (1997). Family farming. Family farming
  31. 31. P Lima-Neto (2018). Rural extension and family agriculture. Rural extension and family agriculture
  32. 32. J Lima,M Figueiredo (2006). Family farming and sustainable development. Family farming and sustainable development
  33. 33. N Marques,H (1998). Family farming: understanding and transforming. Family farming: understanding and transforming
  34. 34. L Mattei The Food Acquisition Program (PAA) in perspective: notes and questions for the debate. The politics lived: critical look at public policy monitoring
  35. 35. Ana Malheiros Torbey,Ana Durán Bustamante,Aurea Grippa De Souza,Carmen Zampirole Brandão,Luan Rodrigues Abdallah,Yves Pacheco Dias March E Souza,Evandro Tinoco Mesquita (2011). Non-Compacted Cardiomyopathy in Children and Adolescents: From the Challenge of Echocardiographic Diagnosis to Clinical Follow-Up. ABC Imagem Cardiovascular, 34(4)
  36. 36. (2014). Booklet of the Harvest Plan of Family Agriculture 2013/2014. Booklet of the Harvest Plan of Family Agriculture 2013/2014
  37. 37. Claudia Mera,Graciela Didonet (2010). Aplicação dos recursos do PRONAF pelos agricultores familiares do município de Cruz Alta (RS). Perspectiva Econômica, 6(2), 45-58.
  38. 38. Sarah Ramos,Rodrigo Pinheiro,Roberto Simão,Rafael Teixeira,Gabriel Silva,Alex Evangelista,Carlos Herdy (2001). Bone age and height prediction of young Brazilian goalkeepers. International Journal of Sport, Exercise and Health Research, 1(2), 56-60.
  39. 39. Mercosur (2018). Guideline for the recognition and identification of family agriculture in Mercosur. Guideline for the recognition and identification of family agriculture in Mercosur
  40. 40. E Mussoi (2006). Rural extension, challenges of new times: agroecology and sustainability. Rural extension, challenges of new times: agroecology and sustainability
  41. 41. S Peixoto (1998). History of family agriculture in Brazil. RevistaAgrícola, 2
  42. 42. Susana Haidamus,Maria Lorenzon,Ortrud Barth (2011). Biological Elements and Residues in Brazilian Honeys. Greener Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(1), 8-14.
  43. 43. Pronaf (2007). National Program for Strengthening Family Agriculture. National Program for Strengthening Family Agriculture
  44. 44. A Ruscheinsky (2003). In the conflict of Interpretations: The plot of sustainability. Ways for sustainable development, 10
  45. 45. Fernanda Rech,Fabio Da Silva,Liane Roldo,Lauren Duarte (2004). MORPHOLOGICAL, CHEMICAL, AND THERMAL CHARACTERIZATION OF TOBACCO STALK FOR APPLICATION IN COMPOSITE MATERIALS. Engineering and Technology Journal, 08(05)
  46. 46. L Secchi (2010). Public policies: concepts, schemes of analysis, practical cases. Public policies: concepts, schemes of analysis, practical cases
  47. 47. Sandro Silva (2015). A dinâmica das políticas públicas de desenvolvimento rural e sua incidência territorial: uma análise do Pronaf no Território Vale do Murici/MG. Extensão Rural, 22(2), 60-78.
  48. 48. M Silva,N Ribeiro (2018). Agricultura Familiar: Setor Estratégico para o Desenvolvimento Local no Município de Mogeiro -PB. Agricultura Familiar: Setor Estratégico para o Desenvolvimento Local no Município de Mogeiro -PB
  49. 49. H Souza-Filho,De (2001). Sustainableagriculturaldevelopment. Agroindustrial management
  50. 50. E Teixeira (2002). The Role of Public Policies in Local Development and Reality Transformation. The Role of Public Policies in Local Development and Reality Transformation
  51. 51. Judith Tendler (1998). Good Government in the Tropics. Good governance in the tropics: a critical view
  52. 52. Adriele Lamim,Salete Queiroz (1987). Argumentation in chemistry education: analysis of articles published in Brazilian journals. Introduction to research in social sciences: qualitative research in education

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ruan Carlos dos Santos, Ismael Luiz dos Santos, Gilmar da Silva, Lidinei Eder Orso, Elaine John. 2019. "Effects of Government Programs on Food Acquisition for Family Farming: The Cooperative Seed between Brazil-Africa". Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 19 (GJMBR Volume 19 Issue A7).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification JEL Code: M10
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
July 5, 2019

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 729
Total Downloads: 63
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Effects of Government Programs on Food Acquisition for Family Farming: The Cooperative Seed between Brazil-Africa

Ruan Santos
Ruan Santos
Ismael Santos
Ismael Santos
Gilmar Silva
Gilmar Silva
Lidinei Orso
Lidinei Orso
Elaine John
Elaine John