Elementary Principalas Technology Leadership Dispositions

1
Alejandro Garcia
Alejandro Garcia
2
Abrego Jesus
Abrego Jesus
1 One West University Blvd.

Send Message

To: Author

GJHSS Volume 14 Issue G9

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

A0GG2

Elementary Principalas Technology Leadership Dispositions Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

The objective of our study was to evaluate, in a population of Togolese People Living With HIV(PLWHIV), the agreement between three scores derived from the general population namely the Framingham score, the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), the evaluation of the cardiovascular risk (CVR) according to the World Health Organization.
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This qualitative study examined the reported technology dispositions that a group of elementary principals in a South Texas public school district possess as technology leaders as aligned to the 2009 National Technology Standards for Administrators (NETS-A). An online questionnaire and open-ended audio recorded interviews were utilized to determine technology dispositions of the participants. Findings included the following five dispositions: 1) Technology’s usefulness, 2) Risk taking, 3) Self-reliance, 4) Encouragement, and 5) Role model.

Article content is being processed or not available yet.

58 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Vincent Anfara,Kathleen Brown,Terri Mangione (2002). Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public.
  2. R Anderson,S Dexter (2000). School technology leadership: Incidence and impact.
  3. (2000). American heritage dictionary of the English language.
  4. A Baylor,D Ritchie (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms.
  5. P Berger,T Luckmann (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise it's the Sociology of Knowledge.
  6. W Bozeman,S Raucher (1991). Application of computer technology to educational administration in the United States.
  7. A Bryman,R Burgess (1994). Analyzing Qualitative Data.
  8. Lantry Brockmeier,Janet Sermon,Warren Hope (2005). Principals' Relationship With Computer Technology.
  9. S Brooks-Young (2002). Making technology standards work for you: A guide for school administrators.
  10. C Cavanaugh (2001). ISTE National Educational Technology Standards for Appendix A.6 Administrators (NETS•A), 2009.
  11. I.-H Chang (2012). The effect of principals' technological leadership on teachers' Technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary schools.
  12. K Charmaz (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation.
  13. T Creighton (2003). The Principal as Technology Leader.
  14. J Creswell (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches 2 nd Edition.
  15. M Crotty (1998). The Foundation of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process.
  16. D Dempsey (1999). The Principal Push for Technology.
  17. D Delafield,K Friedrich,J Bruysschaard,L Villareal,A Macneil (1999). Inhibitors to Computer Use in Schools: The Principals' Perspective.
  18. Todd Dewett,Gareth Jones (2001). The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment.
  19. J Donlevy (2004). Preparing Future Educational Leaders: Technology Standards for School Administrators.
  20. K Dukes (2005). Cronbach's Alpha. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics.
  21. S Emery (1978). Once You Have a Plan, Rehearse It.
  22. P Ertmer,H Bai,C Dong,M Khalil,S Park,L Wang (2002). Technology Leadership: Shaping Administrators' Knowledge and Skills through an Online Professional Development Course.
  23. L Flanagan,M Jacobsen (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal.
  24. M Fullan (1991). The new meaning of educational change.
  25. M Fullan (1998). Leadership for the 21 st Century: Breaking the Bonds of Dependency Educational Leadership.
  26. Michael Fullan,Claudia Cuttress,Ann Kilcher (2002). 8 Forces for Leaders of Change.
  27. Michael Fullan (2002). The Role of Leadership in the Promotion of Knowledge Management in Schools.
  28. A Garcia (2009). The development of elementary principals as technology leaders.
  29. B Glaser,A Strauss (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.
  30. D Gosmire,M Grady (2007). A Bumpy Road: Principal as Technology Leader Principal Leadership (Middle School Edition).
  31. L Holland,T Moore-Steward (2000). A different divde: preparing tech-savvy leaders Retrieved on October 28.
  32. Daniel Packard (2004). School size and instructional leadership of elementary school principals.
  33. (2009). ISTE National Educational Technology Standards for Appendix A.6 Administrators (NETS•A), 2009.
  34. D Jacobsen (2001). Building different bridges: Technology integration, engaged student learning, and new approaches to professional development.
  35. M Jacobsen,P Clifford,S Friesen (2002). Preparing teachers for technology integration: Creating a culture of inquiry in the context of use.
  36. G Kearsley,W Lynch (1992). Educational Leadership in the Age of Technology: The New Skills.
  37. B Kelley,B Kinard,W Hope (1999). Perception of Training Needs: Principals' Use of Computer Technology in the School Environment.
  38. André Kukla (2000). Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Science.
  39. Y Lincoln,E Guba (1985). A Naturalistic Inquiry.
  40. Angus Macneil,D Delafield (1998). The electronic meeting system and case study method for school principal preparation.
  41. A Macneil,D Delafield,K Friedrich,J Bruysschaard,L Villarreal (1999). Inhibitors to Computer Use in Schools: The Principal's Perspective.
  42. W Martin,K Culp,A Gersick,H Nudell (2003). Intel Teach to the Future: Lessons learned from the evaluation of a large-scale technologyintegration professional development program.
  43. H Mehlinger,S Powers (2002). Technology and teacher education: A guide for educators and policymakers.
  44. M Miles,A Huberman (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.
  45. N Nordin,Y Yusof,K Jusoff (2010). A Quantitative Analysis of Malaysian Secondary school Technology Leadership.
  46. M Patton (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.
  47. T Pfundstien (2003). Figure 1.2 How teachers teach and students learn.
  48. M Prensky (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Retrieved on September 11.
  49. D Richie (1996). The Administrative Role in the Integration of Technology.
  50. M Romano (2003). Empowering teachers with technology.
  51. J Sandholz,C Ringstaff,D Dwyer (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating studentcentered classrooms.
  52. T Schmeltzer (2001). Training Administrators to be Technology Leaders.
  53. L Schrum,L Galizio,P Ledesma (2011). Educational leadership and technology integration: An investigation into preparation, experiences, and roles.
  54. J Slowinski (2003). Becoming a technologically savvy administrator.
  55. W Thomas (1999). Is Sierra Leone’s Education Sector Ready for Technology?: Baseline Technical Note Using EdTech Readiness Index (ETRI) 2022.
  56. B West (2003). Building the Bridge to Effective Use of Technology.
  57. Kelvin Willoughby (2004). Technological semantics and technological practice: Lessons from an enigmatic episode in twentieth-century technology studies.
  58. Helen Wildy,Coral Pepper,Luo Guanzhong (2010). Applying standards for leaders to the selection of secondary school principals.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

. 2015. \u201cElementary Principalas Technology Leadership Dispositions\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 14 (GJHSS Volume 14 Issue G9): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 14 Issue G9
Pg. 57- 70
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 14, 2015

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4163
Total Downloads: 2060
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Article in Review

This qualitative study examined the reported technology dispositions that a group of elementary principals in a South Texas public school district possess as technology leaders as aligned to the 2009 National Technology Standards for Administrators (NETS-A). An online questionnaire and open-ended audio recorded interviews were utilized to determine technology dispositions of the participants. Findings included the following five dispositions: 1) Technology’s usefulness, 2) Risk taking, 3) Self-reliance, 4) Encouragement, and 5) Role model.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Elementary Principalas Technology Leadership Dispositions

Alejandro Garcia
Alejandro Garcia One West University Blvd.
Abrego Jesus
Abrego Jesus

Research Journals