Enabling Resesrchers to Make their Data Count

1
Ajit Singh
Ajit Singh
1 Patna Womens College

Send Message

To: Author

GJCST Volume 19 Issue C1

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDEN0886

Enabling Resesrchers to Make their Data Count Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Over the last years, many organizations have been working on infrastructure to facilitate sharing and reuse of research data. This means that researchers now have ways of making their data available, but not necessarily incentives to do so. Several Research Data Alliance (RDA) working groups have been working on ways to start measuring activities around research data to provide input for new Data Level Metrics (DLMs). These DLMs are a critical step towards providing researchers with credit for their work. In this paper, I describe the outcomes of the work of the Scholarly Link Exchange (Scholix) working group and the Data Usage Metrics working group. The Scholix working group developed a framework that allows organizations to expose and discover links between articles and datasets, thereby providing an indication of data citations. The Data Usage Metrics group works on a standard for the measurement and display of Data Usage Metrics. Here I explain how publishers and data repositories can contribute to and benefit from these initiatives. Together, these contributions feed into several hubs that enable data repositories to start displaying DLMs. Once these DLMs are available, researchers are in a better position to make their data count and be rewarded for their work.

14 Cites in Articles

References

  1. B Bierer,Crosas,H Pierce (2017). Data authorship as an incentive to data sharing.
  2. Christine Borgman (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data.
  3. Adrian Burton,Amir Aryani,Hylke Koers,Paolo Manghi,Sandro La Bruzzo,Markus Stocker,Michael Diepenbroek,Uwe Schindler,Martin Fenner (2017). The Scholix Framework for Interoperability in Data-Literature Information Exchange.
  4. A Burton (2017). Scholix Metadata Schema for Exchange of Scholarly Communication Links.
  5. Adrian Burton,Hylke Koers,Paolo Manghi,Sandro La Bruzzo,Amir Aryani,Michael Diepenbroek,Uwe Schindler (2017). The data-literature interlinking service.
  6. F Cantu-Ortiz (2017). Research Analytics.
  7. Helena Cousijn,Amye Kenall,Emma Ganley,Melissa Harrison,David Kernohan,Thomas Lemberger,Fiona Murphy,Patrick Polischuk,Simone Taylor,Maryann Martone,Tim Clark (2018). A data citation roadmap for scientific publishers.
  8. Martin Fenner,Daniella Lowenberg,Matt Jones,Paul Needham,Dave Vieglais,Stephen Abrams,Patricia Cruse,John Chodacki (2018). Code of practice for research data usage metrics release 1.
  9. John Kratz,Carly Strasser (2015). Making data count.
  10. Roderic Page (2018). Make Data Count Kaggle Competition.
  11. Philippe Mongeon,Nicolas Robinson-Garcia,Wei Jeng,Rodrigo Costas (2017). Incorporating data sharing to the reward system of science.
  12. Heather Piwowar,Todd Vision (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage.
  13. A Rauber (2016). Identification of Reproducible Subsets for Data Citation, Sharing and Re-Use.
  14. Gianmaria Silvello (2018). Theory and practice of data citation.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Ajit Singh. 2019. \u201cEnabling Resesrchers to Make their Data Count\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 19 (GJCST Volume 19 Issue C1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Classification
GJCST-C Classification: E.m
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

April 16, 2019

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 5374
Total Downloads: 1354
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Over the last years, many organizations have been working on infrastructure to facilitate sharing and reuse of research data. This means that researchers now have ways of making their data available, but not necessarily incentives to do so. Several Research Data Alliance (RDA) working groups have been working on ways to start measuring activities around research data to provide input for new Data Level Metrics (DLMs). These DLMs are a critical step towards providing researchers with credit for their work. In this paper, I describe the outcomes of the work of the Scholarly Link Exchange (Scholix) working group and the Data Usage Metrics working group. The Scholix working group developed a framework that allows organizations to expose and discover links between articles and datasets, thereby providing an indication of data citations. The Data Usage Metrics group works on a standard for the measurement and display of Data Usage Metrics. Here I explain how publishers and data repositories can contribute to and benefit from these initiatives. Together, these contributions feed into several hubs that enable data repositories to start displaying DLMs. Once these DLMs are available, researchers are in a better position to make their data count and be rewarded for their work.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Enabling Resesrchers to Make their Data Count

Ajit Singh
Ajit Singh Patna Womens College

Research Journals