Entry and Exit Policy and Ties with University as Critical Success Factors Influencing Agri-Business Incubation Performance

Mr. S. C. Bose; Dr. Ravi Kiran; Dr. Dinesh Goyal

Entry and Exit Policy and Ties with University as Critical Success Factors Influencing Agri-Business Incubation Performance

Mr. S. C. Bose * §

Contact

Dr. Ravi Kiran

Contact

Dr. Dinesh Goyal

Contact

§ Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology

Entry and Exit Policy and Ties with University as Critical Success Factors Influencing Agri-Business Incubation Performance

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MBRV7PD5

Entry and Exit Policy and Ties with University as Critical Success Factors Influencing Agri-Business Incubation Performance Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Business incubation performance is linked to many key factors. This study is focusing on two factors, namely Entry and Exit Policy and Ties with University. The effort is to understand that are these Critical success factors influencing Agri-Business Incubation performance. Through literature review the constructs for Entry and Exit Policy was 0.730; for Ties with University, it was designed. The reliability score for all three constructs was above the threshold value of 0.70. Entry and Exit Policy factor had Cronbach alpha of 0.730; for Ties with University it was 0.933 and for Business Incubation (BI) Performance it was 0.703. Factor analysis was conducted for Entry and Exit Policy factors and it helped to reduce the seven items to three, viz. i) EE11: Applicant’s proposal potentiality; ii) EE12: Admission & Graduation policy; and iii) EE13: Post incubation scenario. These three factors explained 81.378 percent of the variance. A model depicting relation of SEM-PLS was Entry and Exit Policy and Ties with University was designed to understand the criticality of these factors. Results suggest that both Entry and Exit Policy factors and Ties with University emerged as significant predictors of BI performance. They explained 49.2 percent of the variation. This study thus highlights that entry and exit policy and Ties with University emerge as important predictors of agri-BI performance.

References

37 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Pier Abetti (2004). Government-Supported Incubators in the Helsinki Region, Finland: Infrastructure, Results, and Best Practices.
Rudy Aernoudt (2004). Incubators: Tool for Entrepreneurship?.
Kris Aerts,Paul Matthyssens,Koen Vandenbempt (2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators.
İ Akçomak (2009). Incubators as Tools for Entrepreneurship Promotion in Developing Countries.
D Allen,S Rahmam (1985). Small Business Incubators: A Positive Environment for Entrepreneurship.
H Al-Mubaraki,M Busler (2010). The incubators economic indicators: Mixed approaches.
Tony Bailetti (2012). Technology Entrepreneurship: Overview, Definition, and Distinctive Aspects.
Anna Bergek,Charlotte Norrman (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework.
R Bhabra-Remedios,B Cornelius (2003). Cracks in the Egg: improving performance measure in business incubator research.
Sue Birley (1986). The role of new firms: Births, deaths and job generation.
O Brooks,Jr (1986). Impact of Business Incubators on Economic Growth and Entrepreneurship Development.
Johan Bruneel,Tiago Ratinho,Bart Clarysse,Aard Groen (2012). The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations.
A Buys,P Mbewana (2007). Key success factors for business incubation in South Africa: the Godisa study.
Elias Carayannis,Maximilian Von Zedtwitz (2005). Architecting gloCal (global–local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices.
K Chan,T Lau (2005). Assessing technology incubators programs in the Science © 2018 Global Journals Park: the good, the bad and the ugly.
N Churchill,Lewis (1983). The five stages of small business growth.
Simon Collinson,Geoff Gregson (2003). Knowledge networks for new technology–based firms: an international comparison of local entrepreneurship promotion.
Nobuya Fukugawa (2013). Which Factors do Affect Success of Business Incubators.
Rosa Grimaldi,Alessandro Grandi (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models.
Sean Hackett,David Dilts (2004). A Systematic Review of Business Incubation Research.
Sean Hackett,David Dilts (2004). A Real Options-Driven Theory of Business Incubation.
Sean Hackett,David Dilts (2008). Inside the black box of business incubation: Study B—scale assessment, model refinement, and incubation outcomes.
Paul Hannon (2003). A conceptual development framework for management and leadership learning in the UK incubator sector.
M Hansen (2000). Networked Incubators: Hothouses of the new economy.
D Isabelle (2013). Key Factors Affecting a Technology Entrepreneur's Choice of Incubator or Accelerator.
K Kumar,Suresh,D Ravindran (2012). A study on element of key success factors determining the performance of incubators.
R Lalkaka (2002). Technology business incubators to help build an innovation-based economy.
R Lalkaka,P Abetti (1999). Business incubation and Enterprise support system in restructuring countries.
R Lalkaka,J Bishop (1996). Business Incubators in Economic Development: An Initial Assessment in Industrializing Countries.
C Lendner,M Dowling (2003). University business incubators and the impact of their networks on the success of start-ups: An international study.
Maura Mcadam,Rodney Mcadam (2008). High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: The relationship between the start-up's lifecycle progression and use of the incubator's resources.
Sarfraz Mian,U (1994). US university-sponsored technology incubators: an overview of management, policies and performance.
Sarfraz Mian (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms.
Sarfraz Mian (1997). Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: An integrative framework.
Nigel Nicholson (1992). Book Reviews : Joseph A. Raelin: The Clash of Cultures: Managers and Professionals.
S Pals (2006). Factors determining success/failure in business incubators: A literature review of 17 countries.
Phillip Phan,Donald Siegel,Mike Wright (2005). Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mr. S. C. Bose, Dr. Ravi Kiran, Dr. Dinesh Goyal. 2018. "Entry and Exit Policy and Ties with University as Critical Success Factors Influencing Agri-Business Incubation Performance". Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 18 (GJMBR Volume 18 Issue A11).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 18 Issue A11

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-A Classification JEL Code: Q10

Q13

Submission ReceivedDecember 10, 2017
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2018
Published January 15, 2018

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 10, 2018

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 160

Country: Unknown

Subject: Global Journal of Management and Business Research

Authors: Mr. S. C. Bose, Dr. Ravi Kiran, Dr. Dinesh Goyal (PhD/Dr. count: 2)

View Count (all-time): 241

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1106

Total Downloads (simulated): 92

Publish Date: 2018 01, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 24 views
Month 2: 42 views
Month 3: 52 views
Month 4: 43 views
Month 5: 60 views
Month 6: 32 views
Month 7: 30 views
Month 8: 41 views
Month 9: 29 views
Month 10: 34 views
Month 11: 53 views
Month 12: 28 views
Month 13: 35 views
Month 14: 25 views
Month 15: 31 views
Month 16: 37 views
Month 17: 28 views
Month 18: 42 views
Month 19: 23 views
Month 20: 24 views
Month 21: 22 views
Month 22: 11 views
Month 23: 28 views
Month 24: 35 views
Month 25: 43 views
Month 26: 25 views
Month 27: 37 views
Month 28: 17 views
Month 29: 29 views
Month 30: 22 views
Month 31: 23 views
Month 32: 27 views
Month 33: 38 views
Month 34: 25 views
Month 35: 25 views
Month 36: 17 views
Month 37: 40 views
Month 38: 41 views
Month 39: 37 views
Month 40: 15 views
Month 41: 25 views
Month 42: 24 views
Month 43: 17 views
Month 44: 18 views
Month 45: 26 views
Month 46: 29 views
Month 47: 30 views
Month 48: 25 views
Month 49: 38 views
Month 50: 29 views
Month 51: 37 views
Month 52: 17 views
Month 53: 27 views
Month 54: 32 views
Month 55: 27 views
Month 56: 26 views
Month 57: 44 views
Month 58: 37 views
Month 59: 26 views
Month 60: 40 views
Month 61: 37 views
Month 62: 15 views
Month 63: 26 views
Month 64: 25 views
Month 65: 32 views
Month 66: 20 views
Month 67: 45 views
Month 68: 32 views
Month 69: 28 views
Month 70: 33 views
Month 71: 26 views
Month 72: 21 views
Month 73: 32 views
Month 74: 34 views
Month 75: 35 views
Month 76: 23 views
Month 77: 48 views
Month 78: 25 views
Month 79: 32 views
Month 80: 22 views
Month 81: 29 views
Month 82: 36 views
Month 83: 40 views
Month 84: 40 views
Month 85: 33 views
Month 86: 21 views
Month 87: 30 views
Month 88: 57 views
Month 89: 37 views
Month 90: 22 views
Month 91: 35 views
Month 92: 22 views
Month 93: 25 views
Month 94: 33 views
Month 95: 38 views
Month 96: 34 views
Month 97: 33 views
Month 98: 43 views
Month 99: 23 views
Month 100: 17 views
Month 101: 32 views
Month 102: 28 views
Month 103: 49 views
Month 104: 36 views
Month 105: 31 views

Total Views: 1.1K

Total Downloads: 92

All Trends