Epistemological Dualism between Einsteins Relativity and Quantum Mechanics and the five-dimensional Continuum for Universe

1
Stanislav Konstantinov
Stanislav Konstantinov
2
S.I. Konstantinov
S.I. Konstantinov

Send Message

To: Author

GJSFR Volume 20 Issue A6

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFR1Z85D

Epistemological Dualism between Einsteins Relativity and Quantum Mechanics and the five-dimensional Continuum for Universe Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The article is an answer to the call of Dr. Stefano Veneroni, the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart explain the relationship between the continuum and discreteness in the epistemological model of the classical theory and explain how can Quantum Mechanics explain the connection between matter, antimatter, and gravitation, while being respectful of the (phoronomic) rules of general relativity? To answer the Dr. Stefano Veneroni questions, I first propose to recognize that Minkowski’s space-time, as well as an attempt Einstein in General Relativity Theory to generalize it to the case of accelerated motion, cannot be accepted as the basic model for describing the Universe. As such a basic model, the author sees the Finsler space of projective geometry, which allows combining the coordinate space and the space of impulses into a single continuum. In the article emphasized the role of the theory of global resonance in the birth of particles and the self-organization of matter in the five-dimensional continuum of the Universe.

22 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Stefano Veneroni (2015). Kant, Einstein et la question épistémologique fondamentale de la Science 'classique.
  2. S Konstantinov (2016). Metaphysics of Classical Space and Time.
  3. Lee Smolin (2006). The trouble with physics: the rise of string theory, the fall of a science, and what comes next.
  4. S Konstantinov (2019). Epistemological Optimism of Knowledge of the Physics of the Universe.
  5. I Prigogine,I Stengers,Time (1994). Chaos, Quantum.
  6. A Einstein (1915). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein.
  7. I Taganov (2014). Physics of Irreversible Time.
  8. Mario Bunge (2003). Philosophy of Physics.
  9. V Zhotikov (2014). Introduction to Finsler geometry and its generalization (for physicists).
  10. A Eddincton (1946). Fundamental Theory.
  11. Yu Vladimirov (2012). Space and Time: Explicit and Hidden Dimensions.
  12. Jonathan Feng (2016). Protophobic Fifth Force Interpretation of the Observed Anomaly in 8Be Nuclear Transitions.
  13. N Tokareva,A Gorodilova,S Agievich,N Kolomeec,A Kutsenko,A Oblaukhov,G Shushuev (1998). MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN SOLUTIONS OF THE PROBLEMS PRESENTED AT THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS’ OLYMPIAD IN CRYPTOGRAPHY.
  14. A Einstein (1936). Physik und Realitat.
  15. G Shipov (1997). The theory of the physical vacuum. Theory, Experiments and Technologies.
  16. V Fock (1956). Notes on the creative biography of A. Einstein.
  17. Hermann Minkowski (1909). Raum und Zeit.
  18. L Keldysh (1954). On the representation of pulsed open mappings as a superposition.
  19. Mizner Ch,K Thorne,J Wheeler (1977). Gravity Volume 3.
  20. Stephen Hawking (1988). From the Big Bang to Black Holes.
  21. V Venkatraman Krishnan (2020). Lense-Thirring frame dragging induced by a fast-rotating white dwarf in a binary pulsar system.
  22. Luca Baiotti (2019). Gravitational waves from neutron star mergers and their relation to the nuclear equation of state.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Stanislav Konstantinov. 2020. \u201cEpistemological Dualism between Einsteins Relativity and Quantum Mechanics and the five-dimensional Continuum for Universe\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 20 (GJSFR Volume 20 Issue A6): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 20 Issue A6
Pg. 31- 38
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-A Classification: FOR Code: 010503p
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 30, 2020

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2431
Total Downloads: 1139
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

The article is an answer to the call of Dr. Stefano Veneroni, the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart explain the relationship between the continuum and discreteness in the epistemological model of the classical theory and explain how can Quantum Mechanics explain the connection between matter, antimatter, and gravitation, while being respectful of the (phoronomic) rules of general relativity? To answer the Dr. Stefano Veneroni questions, I first propose to recognize that Minkowski’s space-time, as well as an attempt Einstein in General Relativity Theory to generalize it to the case of accelerated motion, cannot be accepted as the basic model for describing the Universe. As such a basic model, the author sees the Finsler space of projective geometry, which allows combining the coordinate space and the space of impulses into a single continuum. In the article emphasized the role of the theory of global resonance in the birth of particles and the self-organization of matter in the five-dimensional continuum of the Universe.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Epistemological Dualism between Einsteins Relativity and Quantum Mechanics and the five-dimensional Continuum for Universe

S.I. Konstantinov
S.I. Konstantinov

Research Journals