Errors of the Wheeler School, the Distortions to General Relativity and the Damage to Education in MIT Open Courses in Physics

1
c._y._lo
c._y._lo
2
C. Y. Lo
C. Y. Lo

Send Message

To: Author

GJSFR Volume 13 Issue A7
Errors of the Wheeler School, the Distortions to General Relativity and the Damage to Education in MIT Open Courses in Physics

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFRR5VG4

Errors of the Wheeler School, the Distortions to General Relativity and the Damage to Education in MIT Open Courses in Physics Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

General relativity is difficult to understand, and recently it is discovered as not yet self-consistent. Einstein’s theory of measurement is known as incompatible with the rest of physics, and thus misinterpretations were created. Among them, the dominant misinterpretations of the Wheeler School are due to inadequacy in mathematics and physics. In particular, their distortions of Einstein’s equivalence principle maintain initial errors and create their own errors. Moreover, the errors on dynamic solutions have far reaching consequences to other areas of physics. These errors are responsible for the mistakes in the press release of the 1993 Nobel Committee who was unaware of the non-existence of dynamic solutions and the experimental supports to Einstein’s equivalence principle. To illustrate the damages of such misinterpretations and errors to education, the MIT Open Course Phys. 8.033 is chosen since it is accessible to the public and the influence of the Wheeler School to MIT is a relatively recent event.

97 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Pei Zhou,Yuan (1983). Proc. of the Third Marcel Grossmann Meetings on Gen. Relativ. ed. Hu Ning.
  2. P Zhou (1987). Proc. of the Internat. Symposium on Experimental Gravitational Physics.
  3. C Lo (2010). On the question of gauge invariance in physics and Einstein’s covariance principle.
  4. C Misner,K Thorne,J Wheeler (1973). Gravitation.
  5. C Will (1981). Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics.
  6. R Wald (1984). General Relativity.
  7. Hans Ohanian,Remo Ruffini (1994). Gravitation and Spacetime.
  8. Demetrios Christodoulou,Sergiu Klainerman (1993). The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Minkowski Space (PMS-41).
  9. C Lo (2010). Rectifiable inconsistencies and related problems in general relativity.
  10. C Lo (2007). Einstein's Equivalence Principle, the Principle of Causality, and Plane-Wave Solutions..
  11. C Lo (1993). Linearization of the Einstein Equation and the.
  12. H Bondi,F Pirani,& Robinson (1959). Unknown Title.
  13. C Lo (2008). The Question of Einstein's Speculation E = mc2 and Related Experiments.
  14. K Thorne (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps.
  15. A Einstein,H,A Lorentz,H Minkowski,H Weyl (1923). The Principle of Relativity.
  16. A Einstein (1954). The Meaning of Relativity.
  17. Slava Turyshev,Viktor Toth,Larry Kellogg,Eunice Lau,Kyong Lee (2006). A STUDY OF THE PIONEER ANOMALY: NEW DATA AND OBJECTIVES FOR NEW INVESTIGATION.
  18. C Lo (2009). Int. Conf. on Phys. Interpretations of Relat. Theory.
  19. G Slava,Turyshev,T Viktor,Toth (2009). Unknown Title.
  20. A Einstein (1934). On the Method of Theoretical physics.
  21. J Norton (1989). What was Einstein's Principle of Equivalence?.
  22. C Lo (2003). On Criticisms of Einstein's Equivalence Principle.
  23. C Lo (2007). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics.
  24. A Einstein (1911). On the influence of Gravitation on the propagation of light.
  25. V Fock (1964). The Theory of Space Time and Gravitation.
  26. R Tolman (1987). Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology.
  27. J Hsu,L Hsu (1997). Blastogenesis of Human Lymphocytes by Endotoxin.
  28. P Bergmann (1976). Introduction to the Theory of Relativity.
  29. A Einstein (1920). Relativity.
  30. C Lo (2005). Misunderstandings Related to Einstein's Principle of Equivalence and Einstein's Theoretical Errors on Measurements..
  31. L Landau,E Lifshitz (1962). Classical Theory of Fields.
  32. W Kundig (1963). Measurement of the Transverse Doppler Effect in an Accelerated System.
  33. W Pauli (1971). Theory of Relativity.
  34. J Synge (1971). Relativity: The General Theory.
  35. Y.-S Huang (1991). Relativistic Kinematics I: A Theory of Relativistic Kinematics Based on Physical Reality.
  36. Liu Liao (1987). General Relativity.
  37. Xinfei Li,Zhihua Li,Xiang Wang,Weijie Zhu,Mingming Ma,Peng Zhang,Hongjian Zhu,He Wang,Xuesong Li,Liqun Zhou (1998). Cine Magnetic Resonance Urography as a New Approach for Postoperative Evaluation of Reconstructed Upper Urinary Tract: A Multicenter study.
  38. C Lo (2008). Limitations of Einstein's equivalence principle and the mass-charge repulsive force..
  39. C Will (1987). Experimental gravitation …' 300 Years of Gravitation.
  40. S Weinberg (1972). Gravitation and Cosmology.
  41. C Lo (2008). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics.
  42. C Lo (2009). 16th Annual Natural Philosophy Alliance Conference.
  43. C Lo (2003). Unknown Title.
  44. A Eddington (1975). The Mathematical Theory of Relativity.
  45. C Lo (2005). Unknown Title.
  46. A Whitehead (1962). The Principle of Relativity.
  47. C Yang,R Mills (1954). Unknown Title.
  48. Ron Shaw (1955). The Problem of Particle Types and Other Contributions to the Theory of Elementary Particles.
  49. Y Aharonov,D Bohm (1959). Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory.
  50. S Weinberg (2000). The Quantum Theory of Fields.
  51. C Lo,G Goldstein,A Napier (1989). Radiation reaction force and unification of electromagnetic and gravitational fields.
  52. C Lo (1992). Atomicity of Charged Particles, the Question of Gauge Invariance, and Unification of Electricity and Gravity.
  53. J Bodenner,C Will (2003). Unknown Title.
  54. J Gérard,S Piereaux (1999). The Observable Light Deflection Angle.
  55. C Lo (2000). On the Incompatibility of Gravitational Radiation with the 1915 Einstein Equation.
  56. C Lo (1995). Unknown Title.
  57. C Lo (2009). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics.
  58. R Feynman (1995). The Feynman Lectures on Gravitation.
  59. C Lo (1999). Compatibility with Einstein's Notion of Weak Gravity: Einstein's Equivalence Principle and the Absence of Dynamic Solutions for the 1915 Einstein Equation.
  60. T Arkhipova,Yu. Tatishcheva,A Kalugina,D Gerkulov,N Slominskaya,N Kuzminykh,O Pryadkina,A Saifitdinova (2006). Time-lapse Microscopy in Preimplant Assessment of Human Embryos.
  61. C Lo,Math (2009). Physics and Philo. in the Interpretations of Relativity Theory II.
  62. R Penrose (1965). Unknown Title.
  63. C Lo (2011). On physical invalidity of the “cylindrical symmetric waves” of ‘t Hooft.
  64. G Hooft Strange Misconceptions of General Relativity.
  65. C Lo (2010). Unknown Title.
  66. A Gullstrand (1921). Unknown Title.
  67. Edmund Bertschinger Cosmological Dynamics.
  68. C Lo (1997). Unknown Title.
  69. J Hogarth (1953). Beker, Prof. Henry Joseph, (born 22 Dec. 1951), Visiting Professor of Information Technology, Royal Holloway (formerly Royal Holloway College, then Royal Holloway and Bedford New College), University of London, since 1984.
  70. Perlick Volker (1996). Unknown Title.
  71. Perlick Volker (2000). Unknown Title.
  72. C Lo (2000). The Question of Validity of the “Dynamic Solutions” Constructed by Christodoulou and Klainerman.
  73. C Lo (2009). The Mass-Charge Repulsive Force and Space-Probes Pioneer Anomaly, Physical Interpretations of the Theory of Relativity Conference.
  74. C Lo (2010). NASA's Space-Probes Pioneer Anomaly and the Mass-Charge Repulsive Force, 17th Annual Natural Philosophy Alliance Conference.
  75. C Lo (2007). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics.
  76. C Lo,C Wong (2006). Unknown Title.
  77. D Yu,V Tsipenyuk,Andreev (2005). Physical Interpretations of the Theory of Relativity Conference.
  78. Albert Einstein (1998). Einstein's Miraculous Year.
  79. C Lo (2011). Could Galileo Be Wrong?.
  80. C Lo (2008). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics.
  81. C Lo (2006). Unknown Title.
  82. C Lo (2012). Gravitation, physics, and technology.
  83. C Lo,Richard Hui (2006). Comments on the invalid proof of Einstein on L = mc<sup>2</sup> and E = mc<sup>2</sup>.
  84. C Lo (2006). Unknown Title.
  85. C Lo (2012). Unknown Title.
  86. (2011). Two gamma-ray researchers awarded 2011 Shaw Prize.
  87. Keng-Yeow Chung,Sheng-Wey Chiow,Sven Herrmann,Steven Chu,Holger Müller (2009). Atom interferometry tests of local Lorentz invariance in gravity and electrodynamics.
  88. C Lo (2006). Unknown Title.
  89. N Straumann (1984). General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics.
  90. C Lo (2002). Unknown Title.
  91. K Thorne (1987). Gravitational radiation' 300 Years of Gravitation.
  92. C Lo (2009). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics.
  93. A Einstein,L Infeld,B Hoffmann (1938). The Gravitational Equations and the Problem of Motion.
  94. T Damour (1987). The problem of motion …' 300 Years of Gravitation.
  95. C Lo,David Chan,C Richard,Hui (2002). Unknown Title.
  96. Friedrich Hehl,Co-Editor (2010). Annalen der Physik, believes an approximate dynamic solution can always be obtained by perturbation.
  97. C Yang (1994). Selected Papers on the Development of Science.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

c._y._lo. 2013. \u201cErrors of the Wheeler School, the Distortions to General Relativity and the Damage to Education in MIT Open Courses in Physics\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 13 (GJSFR Volume 13 Issue A7): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 9, 2013

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4665
Total Downloads: 2557
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

General relativity is difficult to understand, and recently it is discovered as not yet self-consistent. Einstein’s theory of measurement is known as incompatible with the rest of physics, and thus misinterpretations were created. Among them, the dominant misinterpretations of the Wheeler School are due to inadequacy in mathematics and physics. In particular, their distortions of Einstein’s equivalence principle maintain initial errors and create their own errors. Moreover, the errors on dynamic solutions have far reaching consequences to other areas of physics. These errors are responsible for the mistakes in the press release of the 1993 Nobel Committee who was unaware of the non-existence of dynamic solutions and the experimental supports to Einstein’s equivalence principle. To illustrate the damages of such misinterpretations and errors to education, the MIT Open Course Phys. 8.033 is chosen since it is accessible to the public and the influence of the Wheeler School to MIT is a relatively recent event.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Errors of the Wheeler School, the Distortions to General Relativity and the Damage to Education in MIT Open Courses in Physics

C. Y. Lo
C. Y. Lo

Research Journals