Ethical Frameworks for AI-Driven Decision Systems: A Comprehensive Analysis

1
Sanjay Nakharu Prasad Kumar
Sanjay Nakharu Prasad Kumar

Send Message

To: Author

GJCST Volume 25 Issue D1

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

JA8QD

Ethical Frameworks for AI-Driven Decision Systems: A Comprehensive  Analysis Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This article presents a comprehensive analysis of ethical frameworks for artificial intelligence-driven decision systems, addressing the critical need for responsible AI deployment across industries. As AI systems increasingly influence high-stakes decisions in healthcare, finance, criminal justice, and other sectors, the imperative for robust ethical guidelines becomes paramount. The article examines four core ethical principles-fairness, transparency, privacy, and accountability-that form the foundation of responsible AI development, exploring their interconnected nature and practical implementation challenges. Through analysis of implementation strategies and best practices, the article demonstrates how organizations can translate abstract ethical principles into operational reality through systematic approaches including ethical impact assessments, technical implementation of fairness-aware algorithms, organizational governance structures, and meaningful stakeholder engagement. Industry-specific case studies from healthcare, financial services, criminal justice, and autonomous vehicles illuminate both successful implementations and cautionary tales, revealing how ethical considerations vary across sectors based on decision contexts, stakeholder impacts, and regulatory environments. The article further examines the rapidly evolving regulatory landscape, comparing divergent approaches across jurisdictions including the European Union’s comprehensive risk-based framework, the United States’ fragmented sector-specific regulations, and emerging international standards. By synthesizing insights from computer science, philosophy, law, and social sciences, this analysis provides practitioners with actionable guidance for developing AI systems that balance technological innovation with human values, ensuring that AI advancement enhances rather than diminishes human dignity, autonomy, and societal well-being

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Sanjay Nakharu Prasad Kumar. 2026. \u201cEthical Frameworks for AI-Driven Decision Systems: A Comprehensive Analysis\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - D: Neural & AI GJCST-D Volume 25 (GJCST Volume 25 Issue D1): .

Download Citation

Article file ID not found.

Issue Cover
GJCST Volume 25 Issue D1
Pg. 52- 60
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

October 13, 2025

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 180
Total Downloads: 37
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

This article presents a comprehensive analysis of ethical frameworks for artificial intelligence-driven decision systems, addressing the critical need for responsible AI deployment across industries. As AI systems increasingly influence high-stakes decisions in healthcare, finance, criminal justice, and other sectors, the imperative for robust ethical guidelines becomes paramount. The article examines four core ethical principles-fairness, transparency, privacy, and accountability-that form the foundation of responsible AI development, exploring their interconnected nature and practical implementation challenges. Through analysis of implementation strategies and best practices, the article demonstrates how organizations can translate abstract ethical principles into operational reality through systematic approaches including ethical impact assessments, technical implementation of fairness-aware algorithms, organizational governance structures, and meaningful stakeholder engagement. Industry-specific case studies from healthcare, financial services, criminal justice, and autonomous vehicles illuminate both successful implementations and cautionary tales, revealing how ethical considerations vary across sectors based on decision contexts, stakeholder impacts, and regulatory environments. The article further examines the rapidly evolving regulatory landscape, comparing divergent approaches across jurisdictions including the European Union’s comprehensive risk-based framework, the United States’ fragmented sector-specific regulations, and emerging international standards. By synthesizing insights from computer science, philosophy, law, and social sciences, this analysis provides practitioners with actionable guidance for developing AI systems that balance technological innovation with human values, ensuring that AI advancement enhances rather than diminishes human dignity, autonomy, and societal well-being

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Ethical Frameworks for AI-Driven Decision Systems: A Comprehensive Analysis

Sanjay Nakharu Prasad Kumar
Sanjay Nakharu Prasad Kumar

Research Journals