Evaluation on BPR Implementation in Ethiopian Higher Education Institutions

§ Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia, Africa,

Send Message

To: Author

Evaluation on BPR Implementation in Ethiopian Higher Education Institutions

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MBR0LC42

Evaluation on BPR Implementation in Ethiopian Higher Education Institutions Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background

Abstract

This paper analyzes business process re-engineering (BPR) implementation at Ethiopian higher education institutions (EHEI’s) i.e., Mekelle University, Mekelle, and Aksum University, Aksum. It investigates the current status and effectiveness of BPR implementations at the EHEI’s. It reviews the literature relating to the hard and soft factors that cause success and failure for BPR implementations, classifies these factors into subgroups, and identifies critical success and failure factors. Finally, it explains how these factors influence the process of BPR implementation in the higher institutions. Primary data were collected by means of survey questionnaires from academic staff members and interviews with the academics core process owners. One hundred sixty survey questionnaires were distributed to Mekelle (110) and Aksum (50) universities.

References

31 Cites in Article
  1. N Abdolvand,A Albadvi,Z Ferdowsi (2008). Assessing readiness for business process reengineering.
  2. S Adeyemi,M Aremu (2008). Business process reengineering.
  3. H Ahadi (2004). An examination of the role of organizational enablers in business process reengineering and the impact of information technology.
  4. R Ahmad,D Spicer (2002). A study of the cognitive processing models used in the appraisal system: The Malaysian public service.
  5. M Al-Mashari,M Zairi (1999). BPR implementation process: an analysis of key success and failure factors.
  6. Yochanan Altman,Paul Iles (1998). Learning, leadership, teams: corporate learning and organisational change.
  7. Alessio Ascari,Melinda Rock,Soumitra Dutta (1995). Reengineering and organizational change: Lessons from a comparative analysis of company experiences.
  8. Gebrihans Gebrewbet*,S Rao,G Sakthivel,Abadi Gebreyesus,G Kahsay (2009). Gh 24 Bio Generator Power Generating Device.
  9. Min-Yuan Cheng,Ming-Hsiu Tsai,Zhi-Wei Xiao (2006). Construction management process reengineering: Organizational human resource planning for multiple projects.
  10. T Furey (1993). A six step guide to process reengineering.
  11. T Girmay,Y Ftwi,M Geberekidan,M Gebremariam,A Haimanot,K Weldegebriel (2008). Business process reengineering: Academic core process reengineering business case.
  12. G Hall,J Rosenthal,J Wade (1993). How to make reengineering really work.
  13. M Hammer (1990). Reengineering work: Don't automate obliterate.
  14. M Hammer,J Champy (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. 1st Edition.
  15. H Hinterhuber (1995). Business process management: the European approach.
  16. Zhenyu Huang,Prashant Palvia (2001). ERP implementation issues in advanced and developing countries.
  17. A Kinfe (2002). Basic statistics a text book for quantitative methods.
  18. P Love,A Gunasekaran (1997). Process reengineering: A review of enablers.
  19. J Lowenthal (1994). Reengineering the organization: A step-by-step approach to corporate revitalization.
  20. J Martin (1995). The great transition: using the seven disciplines of enterprise engineering to align people, technology, and strategy.
  21. M Martinsons,P Hempel (1998). Chinese business process re-engineering.
  22. Maris Martinsons (2004). ERP in China.
  23. Rodney Mcadam (2003). Radical change: a conceptual model for research agendas.
  24. N Obolensky (1994). Farid Elashmawi and Philip R. Harris: Multicultural management: New skills for global success, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas, USA, 1993, xvi + 234 pages, ISBN 0-88415-042-9 (cloth).
  25. J Pearce,R Robinson (1997). FORECASTING AND MANAGERIAL PLANNING.
  26. Joe Peppard,Daniel Fitzgerald (1997). The transfer of culturally-grounded management techniques: The case of business reengineering in Germany.
  27. D Petrozzo,J Stepper (1994). Successful reengineering.
  28. M Porter (1990). The competitive advantage of nations.
  29. C Ranganathan,J Dhaliwal (2001). A survey of business process reengineering practices in Singapore.
  30. Dan Remenyi,Alison Heafield (1996). Business process re-engineering: some aspects of how to evaluate and manage the risk exposure.
  31. Chwen Sheu,Hsiuju Yen,Dennis Krumwiede (2003). The effect of national differences on multinational ERP implementation: An exploratory study.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ajit Pal Singh, Hailekiros Sibhato. 1970. "Evaluation on BPR Implementation in Ethiopian Higher Education Institutions". Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 12 (GJMBR Volume 12 Issue A11).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification FOR Code: 150403 JEL Code: I23
I25
Version of record

v1.2

Language
English
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 5.1K
Total Downloads: 464
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Evaluation on BPR Implementation in Ethiopian Higher Education Institutions

Ajit Singh
Ajit Singh Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia, Africa,
Hailekiros Sibhato
Hailekiros Sibhato