Evidence in Patient-Based Decision Making

1
Dennis J. Mazur
Dennis J. Mazur
1 Oregon Health and Science University

Send Message

To: Author

GJHSS Volume 14 Issue C3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

IT5ZB

Evidence in Patient-Based Decision Making Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This paper looks at the spirit of social service or seva in four popular contemporary Hindu Inspired Faith Movements (HIFMs) of Indian origin now having a global presence. These include Chinmaya Mission, Vivekananda Kendra, Mata Amritanandamayi Mission and Art of Living. The core questions which this paper addresses are: a) how seva as a mandate originated in these HIFMs b) what in the seva is volitional, what are the prescribed aspects and doctrines c) how tangible seva initiatives interface with various systems and d) how seva contributes to institution building through the interplay of memory and oblivion dynamics thereby evolving the style of HIFMs. This paper argues that seva becomes a pillar of institution building for HIFMs. It operationally stems from volition, prescriptivism and doctrinaire propositions given by the HIFMs. The scope encompasses the core social sectors which then projects the HIFMs assertion/partnership in development goals in a resource limited setting. The styles of seva go beyond simple instilling/extolling of virtues, but rather portray as vanguards of fulfilling social obligations and perpetuating the charismatic teacher and Hindu based memories. With the Hindu inspiration as non-negotiable, the operational form contains communitarian notions of social citizenship and social justice. There is an element of ‘public good’ factoring in the HIFMs ideals.

82 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Amritaswarupananda Puri,Swami (1988). Mata Amritanandamayi Mission Trust and Embracing The World.
  2. Y Arif (2008). Religion and Rehabilitation: Humanitarian Biopolitics, City Spaces and Acts of Religion.
  3. L Babb (1986). Redemptive Encounters. Three Modern Styles in the Hindu Tradition.
  4. Gwilym Beckerlegge (1995). VIVEKANANDA AND HIS ORGANIZATIONAL LEGACY WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO SEVA WITHIN THE RAMAKRISHNA MATH AND MISSION.
  5. G Beckerlegge (1998). Swami Vivekananda and Seva: Taking Social Service Seriously.
  6. Gwilym Beckerlegge (2000). VIVEKANANDA AND HIS ORGANIZATIONAL LEGACY WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO SEVA WITHIN THE RAMAKRISHNA MATH AND MISSION.
  7. G Beckerlegge (2000). The Ramakrishna Mission: The making of a Modern Hindu Movement.
  8. G Beckerlegge (2003). Saffron and Seva: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh's Appropriation of Swami Vivekananda.
  9. J Berger (2003). Religious Non-Governmental Organisations: An Exploratory Analysis.
  10. C Brooks (1989). The Hare Krishnas in India.
  11. J Carroll,W (2006). God's Potters: Pastoral Leadership and the Shaping of Congregations.
  12. Mark Chaves,William Tsitsos (2001). Congregations and Social Services: What They Do, How They Do It, and with Whom.
  13. Lawrence Cohen (2012). The gay guru.
  14. Jacob Copeman,Aya Ikegame (2012). The Guru in South Asia.
  15. Jacob Copeman,Aya Ikegame (2012). The Guru in South Asia.
  16. A Copley (2000). Gurus and their Followers.
  17. (2003). Hinduism in public and private: Reform, Hindutva, gender, and sampraday.
  18. A Crnic (2009). Cult versus Church religiosity: Comparative Study of Hare Krishna Devotees and Catholics in Slovenia.
  19. V Dalmia,H Steitencron,Von (1995). Representing Hinduism.
  20. Adam Dinham,Vivien Lowndes (2008). Religion, Resources, and Representation.
  21. C Fuller (1992). Religious texts, priestly education and ritual action in south Indian temple Hinduism.
  22. F Gautier (2010). The Guru of Joy: Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and The Art of Living.
  23. M Gray,T Lovat (2008). Practical Mysticism, Habermas and Social Work Praxis.
  24. S Guerrlero (2000). L'ISKCON au Brésil: la transformation occidentale d'une religion védique et l'incorporation de ses caractéristiques culturelles à la société locale.
  25. Krishna Gupta (1973). Religious evolution and social change in India: a study of the Ramakrishna Mission movement.
  26. L Guzy (2003). Mahima Dharma Ascetics: A Case Study on Popular Ascetism and its Patronage Structure in Rural Orissa in.
  27. Dana Hamplova,Nespor,R Zdenek (2009). Invisible Religion in a Non-Believing Country: The Case of a Czech Republic.
  28. P Heehs (2003). The Centre of the Religious Life of the World: Spiritual Universalism and Cultural Nationalism in the Works of Sri Aurobindo in.
  29. Tara Hefferan (2007). Finding Faith in Development: Religious Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) in Argentina and Zimbabwe.
  30. V Hodgkinson,M Weitzman (1993). From belief to commitment: The community service activities and finances of religious congregations in the United States.
  31. Jeffrey Isaac (2003). Faith-Based Initiatives: A Civil Society Approach.
  32. C Jaffrelot (1993). The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics: 1925-1990s.
  33. L Jamoul,J Wills (2008). Faith in Politics.
  34. Timothy Jenkins (2010). The Life of Property.
  35. D Johnston,C Sampson (1994). Religion, the Missing Dimension of Statecraft.
  36. M Juergensmeyer (1991). Radhasaomi Reality: The Logic of Modern Faith.
  37. Malavika Kasturi (2010). ‘All gifting is sacred’.
  38. M Kennedy (1925). The Chaitanya Movement.
  39. S Kennedy,W Bielefeld (2006). Charitable Choice at Work: Evaluating Faith-Based Job Programs in the States.
  40. T Kochuyt (2009). God, Gifts and Poor People: On Charity in Islam.
  41. D Kopf (1979). The Brahmo Samaj and the Shaping of the Modern Indian Mind.
  42. J Landres,Ryan Bolger (2007). Emerging Patterns of Interreligious Conversation: A Christian-Jewish Experiment.
  43. F Lebelley (2010). Walking the Path: Narrative of an Experience with H.H. Sri Sri Ravi Shankar.
  44. W Lockhart (2005). Building Bridges and Bonds: Generating Social Capital in Secular and Faith-Based Poverty-to-Work Programs.
  45. R Locklin,J Lauwers (2009). Rewriting the Sacred Geography of Advaita: Swami Chinmayananda and Sankara Dig Vijaya.
  46. Finn Madsen (2000). Asrama, yukta vairagya et structure d'organisation de l'ISKCON.
  47. G Mahajan (1998). Democracy, Difference and Social Justice.
  48. (2010). Mata Amritanandamayi Mission Trust and Embracing The World.
  49. F Neubert (2008). Indicating Commitment: The Notion of Depense in the Study of Religion and Ritual.
  50. T Oomen (2004). Nation, Civil Society and Social Movements.
  51. P Pimpley,S Sharma (1983). Arya Samaj and the Untouchables of Punjab.
  52. P Pipes,H Ebaugh (2002). Faith-Based Coalitions, Social Service and Government Funding.
  53. I Printz (1998). Urban Development and Social Capital: Lessons from Kathmandu.
  54. Ramakrishnanada Puri,Swami (2006). Mata Amritanandamayi Mission Trust and Embracing The World.
  55. H Rustau (2003). The Hindu Woman's Right to Samnyasa: Religious Movement and the Gender Question: The Sri Sarada Math and the Ramakrishna Sarada Mission.
  56. Christy Sapp (2011). Obama's Interfaith Service Challenge: A Call for a New Theology of Service in American Higher Education.
  57. A Saran (1969). Hinduism in contemporary India.
  58. C Silverman (2000). Faith-Based Communities and Welfare Reform: California Religious Community Capacity Study, Quantitative Findings and Conclusion.
  59. Y Singh (1973). Modernisation of Indian Tradition: A Systematic Study of Social Change.
  60. H Slessarer-Janir (2004). Exploring the Attractions of Local Congregations to Community Organising.
  61. Federico Squarcini (2000). In Search of Identity within the Hare Krishna Movement: Memory, Oblivion and Thought Style.
  62. F Squarcini (2002). Power of Mysticsim" and "Mysticism of Power": Understanding the sociopolitical history of a neo Hindu movement.
  63. (2005). Secrets of Relationships: Talks.
  64. M Srinivas (1966). Social Change in Modern India.
  65. Smriti Srinivas (2008). In the Presence of Sai Baba.
  66. T Srinivas (2010). Winged faith: Rethinking globalization and religious pluralism through the Sathya Sai movement.
  67. B Sullivan (1975). Hare Krishna (International Society for Krishna Consciousness).
  68. B Sullivan (1987). Purifying the Earthly Body of God: Religion and Ecology in Hindu India.
  69. A Thapan (2005). The Penguin Swami Chinmayananda Reader.
  70. Eric Twombly (2002). Religious Versus Secular Human Service Organizations: Implications for Public Policy.
  71. C Venugopal (2004). Foreword.
  72. S Bhushan,Raj Singh,Ravi Shanker (2005). BIOEFFICACY OF NEEM AND BT AGAINST POD BORER, HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA IN CHICKPEA.
  73. A Wagner (2008). Religion and Civil Society: A Critical Reappraisal of America's Civic Engagement Debate.
  74. John Walliss (2007). The Brahma Kumaris as a ‘Reflexive Tradition’.
  75. M Warrier (2003). The Seva Ethic and the Spirit of Institution Building in the Mata Amritanandamayi Mission.
  76. L White (1992). The Sāi Bābā Movement: Approaches to the Study of Indian Saints.
  77. R Williams (1984). A New Face of Hinduism: the Swaminarayan Religion.
  78. E Wilson (2011). Much to be Proud of, Much to be Done: Faith-based Organizations and the Politics of Asylum in Australia.
  79. D Winchester (2008). Embodying the Faith: Religious Practice and the Making of Muslim Moral Habitus.
  80. R Wineburg (1992). Local Human Service Provision by Religious Congregations: A Community Analysis.
  81. J Zavos (2000). The Emergence of Hindu Nationalism in India.
  82. John Zavos (2012). Hinduism and Public Space in Europe.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Dennis J. Mazur. 2014. \u201cEvidence in Patient-Based Decision Making\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - C: Sociology & Culture GJHSS-C Volume 14 (GJHSS Volume 14 Issue C3): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 14 Issue C3
Pg. 37- 47
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 11, 2014

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4543
Total Downloads: 2255
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

This paper looks at the spirit of social service or seva in four popular contemporary Hindu Inspired Faith Movements (HIFMs) of Indian origin now having a global presence. These include Chinmaya Mission, Vivekananda Kendra, Mata Amritanandamayi Mission and Art of Living. The core questions which this paper addresses are: a) how seva as a mandate originated in these HIFMs b) what in the seva is volitional, what are the prescribed aspects and doctrines c) how tangible seva initiatives interface with various systems and d) how seva contributes to institution building through the interplay of memory and oblivion dynamics thereby evolving the style of HIFMs. This paper argues that seva becomes a pillar of institution building for HIFMs. It operationally stems from volition, prescriptivism and doctrinaire propositions given by the HIFMs. The scope encompasses the core social sectors which then projects the HIFMs assertion/partnership in development goals in a resource limited setting. The styles of seva go beyond simple instilling/extolling of virtues, but rather portray as vanguards of fulfilling social obligations and perpetuating the charismatic teacher and Hindu based memories. With the Hindu inspiration as non-negotiable, the operational form contains communitarian notions of social citizenship and social justice. There is an element of ‘public good’ factoring in the HIFMs ideals.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Evidence in Patient-Based Decision Making

Dennis J. Mazur
Dennis J. Mazur Oregon Health and Science University

Research Journals