Expression of Traits of Barley (Hordeium vulgare L.) Landrace Crosses Under Waterlogged and Free Drainage Conditions

Expression of Traits of Barley (Hordeium vulgare L.) Landrace Crosses Under Waterlogged and Free Drainage Conditions

Dr. Alemayehu Assefa

Contact

M.T. Labuschagne

Contact

Expression of Traits of Barley (Hordeium vulgare L.) Landrace Crosses Under Waterlogged and Free Drainage Conditions

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

8L2U4

Expression of Traits of Barley (Hordeium vulgare L.) Landrace Crosses Under Waterlogged and Free Drainage Conditions Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Estimates of genetic parameters are useful since they provide information on the inheritance of characters and help to predict the value of crosses. If the value of crosses cannot be predicted, many crosses need to be made which results in each cross having a small population size, fewer progenies in later generations and a lower probability of recovering good genotypes from each cross. The objectives of this study were therefore i) to estimate genetic parameters from diallel crosses involving five inbred lines: Feres Gama(37), Feleme(68), Mage(07), 1153(28) and 1182(44) that vary for different agronomic characters and ii) to determine the breeding value of the parents so that the progeny performance from crosses involving the best parents could be predicted. Data for agronomic characters were obtained from parents and F1 progenies evaluated in a greenhouse under waterlogged and free drainage conditions. The results highlighted the importance of additive gene action for spike length, number of seeds spike-1 and grain yield spike-1 under free drainage conditions and for days to heading and days to maturity at both treatment levels.

References

44 Cites in Article

Reference Format

K Bailey,R Wolfe (1994). Genetic relationships between reaction to common root rot and yield in the progeny of a barley cross.
R Baker (1978). Issues in diallel analysis.
V Bhatnagar,S Sharma (1995). Diallel analysis for combining ability for grain yield and its components in barley.
V Bhatnagar,S Sharma (1995). Diallel analysis for combining ability for grain yield and its components in barley.
V Bhatnagar,S Sharma (1997). Diallel analysis for grain yield and harvest index in barley under diverse environments.
I Bos,P Caligari (1995). Selection methods in plant breeding.
H Bouzerzour,M Dekhili (1997). Heritabilities, gains from selection and genetic correlations for grain yield of barley grown in two contrasting environments.
Y Cai,M Tahir,S Yau (1993). Relationship of growth vigor, leaf color and other agronomic III characters with grain yield in winter and facultative barley in low rainfall environment.
Salvatore Ceccarelli (1994). Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions.
S Ceccarelli (1996). Positive interpretation of genotype by environment interactions in relation to sustainability and biodiversity.
Andra Icrisat,Pradesh Unknown Title.
Bart Van Es (2016). 5. Character.
R Comstock,R Moll (1963). Global earthquake monitoring: its uses, potentials, and support requirements.
A Dabholkar (1992). Elements of Biometrical Genetics.
J Dudley,R Moll (1969). Interpretation and Use of Estimates of Heritability and Genetic Variances in Plant Breeding1.
J Esparza Martínez,A Foster (1998). Genetic analysis of heading date and other agronomic characters in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).
D Falconer (1981). Introduction to quantitative genetics.
D Falconer,T Mackay (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics.
W Fehr (1987). Principles of cultivar development.
K Frey (1954). Inheritance and Heritability of Heading Date in Barley1.
J Gouis,D Beghin,E Heumez,P Pluchard (2002). Diallel analysis of winter wheat at two nitrogen levels.
J Grafius,W Nelson,V Dirks (1952). The Heritability of Yield in Barley as Measured by Early Generation Bulked Progenies1.
B Griffing (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems.
N Haddad,T Bogyo,F Muehlbauer (1982). Genetic variance of six agronomic characters in three lentil (Lens culinaris Medic) crosses.
M Hanifi,A Gallais (1999). Heterosis, genetic effects and value of F2s and doubled-haploid lines in barley breeding.
E Hockett,A Cook,M Khan,J Martin,B Jones (1993). Hybrid Performance and Combining Ability for Yield and Malt Quality in a Diallel Cross of Barley.
M Kudla,M Kudla (1995). Genetic possibilities of increasing yield in spring barley.
Berhane Lakew,Yitbarek Semeane,Fekadu Alemayehu,Hailu Gebre,Stefania Grando,Joop Van Leur,Salvatore Ceccarelli (1997). Exploiting the diversity of barley landraces in Ethiopia.
Anthony Kilili (1983). Studies on Shrink -Wrapping and Low-Oxygen Storage of 'Beauregard' Sweet Potatoes (Ipomoea Batatas (L.) Lam.)..
D Matzinger (1963). Users' guides for radioactivity standards.
O Mayo (1987). The theory of plant breeding.
F Muehlbauer,W Kaiser,S Clement,R Summerfield (1995). Production and breeding of lentil.
D Phogat,D Singh,G Dahiya,D Singh (1995). a. Genetics of protein content and yield in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).
D Phogat,D Singh,G Dahiya,D Singh (1995). Genetics of yield and yield components in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).
N Roy,B Murty (1970). A selection procedure in wheat for stress environment.
S Schittenhelm,J Okeno,W Friedt (1996). Prospects of Agronomic Improvement in Spring Barley Based on a Comparison of Old and New Germplasm.
C Shibin,C Yang,F Xianwen,S Cai,Y Cao,X Fang (1996). Studies on the variability and combining ability of waterlogging tolerance of common wheat.
M Shrivastava,D Seshu (1983). Combining ability for yield and associated characters in rice.
M Singh,S Ceccarelli,J Hamblin (1993). Estimation of heritability from varietal trials data.
S Singh,B Singh (1990). Utilization of Genetic Resources for Barley Improvement.
D Hogarth (1971). Quantitative inheritance studies in sugarcane I. Estimation of variance components.
G Sprague (1966). Quantitative genetics in plant improvement.
Darrell. Wells,Charles Lay (1970). Hybrid Vigor in Hard Red Spring Wheat Crosses1.
J Witcombe,D Virk (2001). Number of crosses and population size for participatory and classical plant breeding.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Alemayehu Assefa. 2013. \u201cExpression of Traits of Barley (Hordeium vulgare L.) Landrace Crosses Under Waterlogged and Free Drainage Conditions\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 13 (GJSFR Volume 13 Issue D3).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJSFR Volume 13 Issue D3

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords

conditions waterlogging respective comparable

Submission ReceivedFebruary 1, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted March 2, 2013
Published March 17, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 30, 2013

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 77

Country: Ethiopia

Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary

Authors: Dr. Alemayehu Assefa, M.T. Labuschagne (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 167

Total Views (Real + Logic): 5135

Total Downloads (simulated): 2662

Publish Date: 2013 03, Sat

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 61 views
Month 2: 29 views
Month 3: 40 views
Month 4: 54 views
Month 5: 52 views
Month 6: 25 views
Month 7: 30 views
Month 8: 28 views
Month 9: 32 views
Month 10: 36 views
Month 11: 51 views
Month 12: 40 views
Month 13: 23 views
Month 14: 44 views
Month 15: 27 views
Month 16: 21 views
Month 17: 24 views
Month 18: 36 views
Month 19: 38 views
Month 20: 20 views
Month 21: 41 views
Month 22: 49 views
Month 23: 34 views
Month 24: 31 views
Month 25: 42 views
Month 26: 27 views
Month 27: 41 views
Month 28: 43 views
Month 29: 20 views
Month 30: 44 views
Month 31: 39 views
Month 32: 34 views
Month 33: 32 views
Month 34: 31 views
Month 35: 33 views
Month 36: 44 views
Month 37: 31 views
Month 38: 26 views
Month 39: 25 views
Month 40: 28 views
Month 41: 16 views
Month 42: 35 views
Month 43: 16 views
Month 44: 43 views
Month 45: 13 views
Month 46: 18 views
Month 47: 44 views
Month 48: 45 views
Month 49: 29 views
Month 50: 31 views
Month 51: 28 views
Month 52: 30 views
Month 53: 19 views
Month 54: 47 views
Month 55: 16 views
Month 56: 21 views
Month 57: 19 views
Month 58: 31 views
Month 59: 34 views
Month 60: 32 views
Month 61: 25 views
Month 62: 30 views
Month 63: 47 views
Month 64: 39 views
Month 65: 30 views
Month 66: 31 views
Month 67: 36 views
Month 68: 36 views
Month 69: 15 views
Month 70: 42 views
Month 71: 39 views
Month 72: 27 views
Month 73: 31 views
Month 74: 43 views
Month 75: 28 views
Month 76: 34 views
Month 77: 43 views
Month 78: 28 views
Month 79: 34 views
Month 80: 24 views
Month 81: 35 views
Month 82: 48 views
Month 83: 27 views
Month 84: 14 views
Month 85: 45 views
Month 86: 36 views
Month 87: 35 views
Month 88: 41 views
Month 89: 19 views
Month 90: 17 views
Month 91: 13 views
Month 92: 23 views
Month 93: 37 views
Month 94: 24 views
Month 95: 28 views
Month 96: 30 views
Month 97: 32 views
Month 98: 37 views
Month 99: 35 views
Month 100: 43 views
Month 101: 40 views
Month 102: 25 views
Month 103: 36 views
Month 104: 34 views
Month 105: 34 views
Month 106: 33 views
Month 107: 24 views
Month 108: 34 views
Month 109: 32 views
Month 110: 34 views
Month 111: 15 views
Month 112: 33 views
Month 113: 34 views
Month 114: 18 views
Month 115: 21 views
Month 116: 19 views
Month 117: 19 views
Month 118: 33 views
Month 119: 29 views
Month 120: 34 views
Month 121: 28 views
Month 122: 40 views
Month 123: 28 views
Month 124: 28 views
Month 125: 25 views
Month 126: 34 views
Month 127: 40 views
Month 128: 40 views
Month 129: 32 views
Month 130: 25 views
Month 131: 10 views
Month 132: 29 views
Month 133: 10 views
Month 134: 31 views
Month 135: 33 views
Month 136: 19 views
Month 137: 33 views
Month 138: 23 views
Month 139: 36 views
Month 140: 17 views
Month 141: 39 views
Month 142: 33 views
Month 143: 44 views
Month 144: 24 views
Month 145: 26 views
Month 146: 36 views
Month 147: 44 views
Month 148: 24 views
Month 149: 29 views
Month 150: 42 views
Month 151: 49 views
Month 152: 33 views
Month 153: 23 views
Month 154: 31 views
Month 155: 21 views
Month 156: 34 views
Month 157: 57 views
Month 158: 49 views

Total Views: 5135

Total Downloads: 2662

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]