1. (2006). Multitasking = Switching Costs. Multitasking = Switching Costs
2. A Astin (1998). The changing American college student: Thirty-year trends, 1966-1996. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 115-135.
3. M Austin (2009). Texting while driving: How dangerous is it? Car and Driver. Texting while driving: How dangerous is it? Car and Driver
4. Peter Kellerhoff (2011). Kühlschrank mit Alexa. VDI nachrichten, 75(01-02-03), 40-40.
5. Y Amichai-Hamburger (2002). Internet and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1), 1-10.
6. Yair Amichai-Hamburger,Gideon Vinitzky (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1289-1295.
7. Y Amichai-Hamburger,G Wainapel,S Fox (2002). On the Internet no one knows I'm an introvert: Extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 5, 125-128.
8. Tel Amiel,Stephanie Sargent (2004). Individual differences in Internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(6), 711-726.
9. J Aspendorpf,S Wilpers (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531-1544.
10. S Birnie,P Horvath (2002). Psychological predictors of Internet social communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7, 13-27.
11. Laura Buffardi,W Campbell (2008). Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1303-1314.
12. Moira Burke,Cameron Marlow,Thomas Lento (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1909-1912.
13. W Barratt,M Hendrickson,A Stephens,J Torres (2005). Community networking in Russia: identifying the research agenda. Community Informatics, 6, 142-152.
14. T Bartlett,P Wasley (2008). Just say 'A': Grade inflation undergoes reality check. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(2), 1-A12.
15. Liz Beastall (2008). Enchanting a disenchanted child: revolutionising the means of education using Information and Communication Technology and e‐learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(1), 97-110.
16. S Cotten (2008). Students' technology use and the impacts on well-being. Using emerging technologies to enhance student engagement. New directions for student services, issue #124, 55-70.
17. M Deberard,G Speilmans,D Julka (2004). Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: A longitudinal study. College Student Journal, 38(1), 66-80.
18. Peter Digregorio,Karen Sobel-Lojeski (2010). The Effects of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs) on Student Performance and Learning: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 38(3), 255-312.
19. P Dimaggio,E Hargittai,C Celeste,S Shafer (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. Social inequality, 355-400.
20. Nicole Ellison,Charles Steinfield,Cliff Lampe (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
21. N Ellison,C Steinfield,C Lampe (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society
22. S Geiser,M Santelices (2007). Validity of highschool grades in predicting student success beyo nd the freshman year: High-school record vs. standardized tests as indicators of four-year college outcomes.
23. Cheryl Gordon,Linda Juang,Moin Syed (2007). Internet Use and Well-Being Among College Students: Beyond Frequency of Use. Journal of College Student Development, 48(6), 674-688.
24. E Hargittai (2008). The digital reproduction of inequality. Social stratification, 936-944.
25. Eszter Hargittai (2008). Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276-297.
26. G Heiberger,R Harper (2008). Have you Facebooked Astin lately? Using technology to increase student involvement. Using emerging technologies to enhance student engagement. New directions for student services, issue #124, 19-35.
27. (2007). College freshmen and online social networking sites. College freshmen and online social networking sites
28. S Jones,S Fox (2009). Pew/Internet: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Choice Reviews Online, 44(01), 44-0384-44-0384.
29. Jae-On Kim (1975). Multivariate Analysis of Ordinal Variables. American Journal of Sociology, 81(2), 261-298.
30. Paul Kirschner,John Sweller,Richard Clark (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
31. Ethan Kolek,Daniel Saunders (2008). Online Disclosure: An Empirical Examination of Undergraduate Facebook Profiles. NASPA Journal, 45(1), 1-25.
32. Mary Skelly (1994). Career Maturity of Undergraduate Students According to Gender, Grade Point Average, Classification, Extracurricular Activity Level and Academic Major Changes. College and University, 69(2), 88-98.
33. Robert Kubey,Michael Lavin,John Barrows (2001). Internet Use and Collegiate Academic Performance Decrements: Early Findings. Journal of Communication, 51(2), 366-382.
34. R Kvavik (2005). Convenience, communications, and control: How students usetechnology. Educating the next generation (chapter 7)
35. J Lei,Y Zhao (2005). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 49, 284-296.
36. A Lipsman (2007). Facebook sees flood of new traffic from teenagers and adults. Com Score
37. Anoush Margaryan,Allison Littlejohn,Gabrielle Vojt (2008). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429-440.
38. Gloria Mark,Daniela Gudith,Ulrich Klocke (2008). The cost of interrupted work. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 107-110.
39. (2000). NTIA Regulatory Alternatives Report. Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide: A report on the telecommunications and information technology gap in America
40. M Owen (2004). Just a tool?. ICT for curriculum enhancement
41. M ; Owen,Pasek (2004). The myth of the digital native. Available from www.futurelab.org. The myth of the digital native. Available from www.futurelab.org
42. M Prenksy (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
43. M Prensky (2003). Digital game-based learning. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1-4.
44. L Rosen (2007). Me, MySpace, and I: Parenting the next generation. Me, MySpace, and I: Parenting the next generation
45. Spss (2009). Using SPSS to Perform Statistical Analyses. An Introductory Guide to SPSS® for Windows®, 61-90.
46. David Strayer,Frank Drews (2007). Multitasking in the Automobile. AttentionFrom Theory to Practice, 121-133.
47. D Strayer,F Drews,D Crouch (2006). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors, 48, 381-391.
48. David Strayer,Frank Drews,William Johnston (2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(1), 23-32.
49. S Thayer,S Ray (2006). Online communication preferences across age, gender, and duration of Internet use. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 9, 432-440.
50. Leman Tosun,Timo Lajunen (2010). Does Internet use reflect your personality? Relationship between Eysenck’s personality dimensions and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 162-167.
51. Zeynep Tufekci (2008). GROOMING, GOSSIP, FACEBOOK AND MYSPACE. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 544-564.
52. Tracy Tuten,Michael Bosnjak (2001). UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENCES IN WEB USAGE: THE ROLE OF NEED FOR COGNITION AND THE FIVE FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 29(4), 391-398.
53. James Weaver (1991). Exploring the links between personality and media preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(12), 1293-1299.
