Facteurs Institutionnels Et Attractivité Des Investissements Directs Étrangers En Afrique Subsaharienne: Une Approche En Panel Dynamique

α
Mohamadou Oumarou
Mohamadou Oumarou
σ
Oumarou Sali
Oumarou Sali

Send Message

To: Author

Facteurs Institutionnels Et Attractivité Des Investissements Directs Étrangers En Afrique Subsaharienne: Une Approche En Panel Dynamique

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

1HVPZ

Facteurs Institutionnels Et Attractivité Des Investissements Directs Étrangers En Afrique Subsaharienne: Une Approche En Panel Dynamique Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The overall objective of this study is to assess the effects of institutional factors on the attractiveness of foreign direct investment (FDI) in sub-Saharan African economies (SSA). To achieve this goal, we use five (05) institutional quality indicators. A dynamic model in panel data is specified and estimates are made by the System of Generalized Moments (MMG) method in the period 2007-2017. The main results obtained show that: (i) the quality of certain institutions (the quality of country policies, the quality of regulation and the rule of law) conditions the level of deepening of the FD and its capacity to make a significant contribution to growth; (ii) We also show that the low quality of regulation and the rule of low as well the uncertainty linked to the political stability of some countries of SSA hinder the entry of FDI in this region; (iii) To contribute to the emergence of more productive and attractive economic systems, the study supports the idea of promoting a legal and regulatory framework providing more guarantees, democracy and restoring political stability.

References

48 Cites in Article
  1. Manuel Arellano,Olympia Bover (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models.
  2. Ari Et Zeren,F (2013). Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Panel Causality Test.
  3. C Araujo,J Brun,J Et Combes (2004). Econométrie.
  4. E Assiedu (2002). On the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries: Is Africa Different?.
  5. B Baltagi (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data.
  6. Badi Baltagi,Georges Bresson,Alain Pirotte (2003). Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor?.
  7. J Behrman (1962). 3. Obstacles to Private Foreign Investment.
  8. Agnès Bénassy‐quéré,Maylis Coupet,Thierry Mayer (2007). Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment.
  9. S Bloc (2001). Does Africa grow differently?.
  10. Richard Blundell,Stephen Bond (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models.
  11. E Borensztein,J De Gregorio,J-W Lee (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?.
  12. Barry Bosworth,Susan Collins,Carmen Reinhart (1999). Capital Flows to Developing Economies: Implications for Saving and Investment.
  13. Clive Bowsher (2002). Modelling Security Market Events in Continuous Time: Intensity Based, Multivariate Point Process Models.
  14. Clive Bowsher (2002). On testing overidentifying restrictions in dynamic panel data models.
  15. H Brossard (1997). Marketing et Gestion de la Recherche et Développement, Jean-Michel Gaillard. Paris, Editions Economica, 1997.
  16. Tim Büthe,Helen Milner (2008). The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements?.
  17. J Butkiewicz,H Et Yanikkaya (2006). Institutional quality and economic growth: Maintenance of the rule of law or democratic institutions, or both?.
  18. Roberto Chang,Linda Kaltani,Norman Loayza (2005). Openness Can Be Good For Growth : The Role Of Policy Complementarities.
  19. Paul Collier,Jan Gunning (1999). Explaining African Economic Performance.
  20. Huy Doan (2019). Trade, Institutional Quality and Income: Empirical Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa.
  21. W Easterly,P Montiel (2005). National policies and economic growth.
  22. W Easterly,R Levine (1997). Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions.
  23. R Ekodo,A Ngomsi (2017). Ouverture Commerciale Et Croissance Economique En Zone CEMAC.
  24. F Gandjon (2017). Régime politique et ouverture commerciale.
  25. F Gandjon,H Et Tchoué (2019). Consommation d'énergie électrique et croissance économique en Afrique centrale.
  26. R Gouenet (2016). Risque D'instabilité Socio-Politique Et Attractivité des Investissement Directs Etrangers (IDE) Au Cameroun.
  27. Douglas Holtz-Eakin,Whitney Newey,Harvey Rosen (1988). Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data.
  28. I Jamilah,Y Zulkornain,M Habibullah,C Lee (2018). Openness and Economic Growth in Developing and OECD Countries.
  29. John Et Nadege,D (2015). What Drives Foreign Direct Investments into West Africa? An Empirical Investigation.
  30. Kyung Im,M Pesaran,Yongcheol Shin (1995). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels.
  31. Haksoon Kim (2010). Political Stability and Foreign Direct Investment.
  32. Kangni Kpodar,Sylviane Guillaumont Jeanneney (2006). Développement financier, instabilité financière et croissance économique.
  33. Andrew Levin,Chien-Fu Lin,Chia-Shang James Chu (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties.
  34. R Lucas (1993). Why Doesn't Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries?.
  35. G Maddala,Shaowen Wu (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test.
  36. Denis Medvedev (2012). Beyond Trade: The Impact of Preferential Trade Agreements on FDI Inflows.
  37. C Michalet (1997). Strategies of multinationals and competition for foreing direct investment.
  38. G Mouna,C Et Mondher (2015). Capital Account Openness, Political Institutions and FDI in the MENA Region: An Empirical Investigation.
  39. J Mucchielli (2002). IDE et exportations : compléments ou substituts.
  40. Y Mundalk (1978). On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data.
  41. Nsiahet Wu (2014). The Role of Spatial Dynamics in the Determination of Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to Africa.
  42. D Rodrik (2005). Growth Strategies.
  43. David Roodman (2009). How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata.
  44. P Sevestre (2002). Econométrie des Données de Panel.
  45. D Siddiqui,Q Et Masood (2013). The effect of institutions on economic growth: Aglobal analysis based on GMM dynamic panel estimation.
  46. J Squalli,K Et Wilson (2011). A New Approach Measure of Trade Openness.
  47. Zhen Wang,Nigel Swain (1995). The determinants of foreign direct investment in transforming economies: Empirical evidence from Hungary and China.
  48. J Wooldridge (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mohamadou Oumarou. 2020. \u201cFacteurs Institutionnels Et Attractivité Des Investissements Directs Étrangers En Afrique Subsaharienne: Une Approche En Panel Dynamique\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - E: Economics GJHSS-E Volume 20 (GJHSS Volume 20 Issue E7): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 20 Issue E7
Pg. 39- 57
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-E Classification: JEL Code: JC23, G20, O55, P40
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 29, 2020

Language
fr
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2174
Total Downloads: 1053
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The overall objective of this study is to assess the effects of institutional factors on the attractiveness of foreign direct investment (FDI) in sub-Saharan African economies (SSA). To achieve this goal, we use five (05) institutional quality indicators. A dynamic model in panel data is specified and estimates are made by the System of Generalized Moments (MMG) method in the period 2007-2017. The main results obtained show that: (i) the quality of certain institutions (the quality of country policies, the quality of regulation and the rule of law) conditions the level of deepening of the FD and its capacity to make a significant contribution to growth; (ii) We also show that the low quality of regulation and the rule of low as well the uncertainty linked to the political stability of some countries of SSA hinder the entry of FDI in this region; (iii) To contribute to the emergence of more productive and attractive economic systems, the study supports the idea of promoting a legal and regulatory framework providing more guarantees, democracy and restoring political stability.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Facteurs Institutionnels Et Attractivité Des Investissements Directs Étrangers En Afrique Subsaharienne: Une Approche En Panel Dynamique

Mohamadou Oumarou
Mohamadou Oumarou
Oumarou Sali
Oumarou Sali

Research Journals