Factors for Measurement of ITES Quality for Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia

α
test
test
σ
Romana Aziz
Romana Aziz
ρ
Basit Shahzad
Basit Shahzad

Send Message

To: Author

Factors for Measurement of ITES Quality for Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDE3WC3N

Factors for Measurement of ITES Quality for Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Information technology has blessed the current scientific era with the promising initiatives that are un-match able with the past. The range of impact is diversified in nature and massive in scale. Information Technology Enabled Services (ITES) have emerged over time in many disciplines. ITES are becoming increasingly prevalent in the global economy. Due to the growing importance of ITES Service Science has emerged as a fundamental area in Information Systems (IS) research and it combines technical and managerial knowledge under the umbrella of the more popular interdisciplinary approach of Service Science Management and Engineering (SSME). Along with the emergence of the ITES the question to measure the quality has also arisen. The measurement of ITES quality in different areas requires different factors to be considered. This paper addresses the identification of the factors for measuring the quality of ITES in higher education institutes in Saudi Arabia. The paper unleashes number of factors that can be used to measure the quality of ITES in higher education institutions.

References

83 Cites in Article
  1. T Bates,A Sangra (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning.
  2. T Mayes,D Morrison,H Mellar,P Bullen,M Oliver (2009). Tansforming Higher Education Through Technology-enhanced Learning: Higher Education Academy.
  3. D Clewes (2003). A student-centred conceptual model of service quality in higher education.
  4. Stephen Wilkins,Melodena Stephens Balakrishnan,Jeroen Huisman (2012). Student satisfaction and student perceptions of quality at international branch campuses in the United Arab Emirates.
  5. G Zhao,H Perros,Z Xin (2009). How service science management and engineering (SSME) can evolve to an academic discipline?.
  6. Ruth Bolton,Shruti Saxena-Iyer (2009). Interactive Services: A Framework, Synthesis and Research Directions.
  7. S Conger,W Hefley,S Galup,R Dattero (2012). Service Quality Measurement: Past and Future.
  8. L.-C Wu,L.-H Wu (2010). Service engineering: an interdisciplinary framework.
  9. K.-P Fähnrich (2005). The Project ServCASE-Software-Service Codesign for IT-Enabled Services.
  10. Charles Hofacker,Ronald Goldsmith,Eileen Bridges,Esther Swilley (2007). E-Services: A Synthesis and Research Agenda.
  11. K Meyer,K Fähnrich (2009). How to Engineer ITenabled Services.
  12. S Uesugi (2013). IT-Enabled Services.
  13. E Shahzad,Alwagait (2014). Best and the Worst Times to Tweet: An Experimental Study.
  14. B Shahzad,E Alwagait (2014). Maximization of Tweet's Viewership with respect to Time.
  15. B Alwagait,Shahzad (2014). When are Tweets Better Valued? An Empirical Study.
  16. B Alwagait,S Shahzad,Alim (2014). Impact of social media usage on students academic performance in Saudi Arabia.
  17. Basit Shahzad,Esam Alwagait (2013). Utilizing Technology in Education Environment: A Case Study.
  18. Basit Shahzad,Esam Alwagait (2013). Smartphone's popularity measurement by investigating Twitter profiles.
  19. Y Al-Ohali,A Al-Oraij,B Shahzad (2011). KSU News Portal: A Case Study.
  20. R Sudan,S Ayers,P Dongier,A Kunigami,S Infrastructure (2010). The Global Opportunity in IT-Based Services.
  21. Basit Shahzad (2014). Identification of Risk Factors in Large Scale Software Projects.
  22. B Shahzad (2014). Identification of Risk Factors in Large Scale Software Projects: A Quantitative Study.
  23. B Shahzad,A Said (2012). Identification of Software Risk Factors in Large Scale Projects: A Quantitative Study.
  24. Muhammad Shahzad,Muhammad Shafiq,Alex Liu (2012). A large scale exploratory analysis of software vulnerability life cycles.
  25. B Shahzad,Y Al-Ohali,A Abdullah (2011). Trivial model for mitigation of risks in software development life cycle.
  26. Basit Shahzad,Abdullah Al-Mudimigh (2011). Risk Identification, Mitigation and Avoidance Model for Handling Software Risk.
  27. I Mathkour,B Shahzad,S Al-Wakeel (2011). Software Risk Management and Avoidance Strategy.
  28. B Shahzad,S Safvi (2010). Risk mitigation and management scheme based on risk priority.
  29. B Shahzad,A Al-Mudimigh (2010). Risk Identification, Mitigation and Avoidance Model for Handling Software Risk.
  30. B Shahzad,A Al-Mudimigh,Z Ullah (2010). Risk Identification and Preemptive Scheduling In Software Development Life Cycle.
  31. A Al-Mudimigh,B Shahzad,Z Ullah (2010). Identification of Methodology for Analysis of the Risk Factors in Software Development Environment.
  32. Basit Shahzad,Abdullah Al-Mudimigh,Zahid Ullah (2010). Statistical methods for sustainable risk identification methodologies.
  33. Basit Shahzad,Abdullah Al-Mudimigh,Zahid Ullah (2010). Empirical selection of risk identification methodology in software.
  34. Basit Shahzad,Ihsan Ullah,Naveed Khan (2009). Software Risk Identification and Mitigation in Incremental Model.
  35. B Shahzad,J (2007). Software Risk Management-Prioritization of frequently occurring Risk in Software Development Phases. Using Relative Impact Risk Model.
  36. B Shahzad,T Afzal,R Irfan (2005). Enhanced Risk Analysis-Relative Impact Factorization.
  37. B Shahzad,S Safvi (1998). Effective risk mitigation: a user prospective.
  38. Basit Shahzad,Romana Aziz,Abas Said (2014). Using Wage Rate Analysis to Determine Software Project Scale.
  39. N Seth,S Deshmukh,P Vrat (2005). Service quality models: a review.
  40. A Parasuraman,Valarie Zeithaml,Leonard Berry (1991). SERVQUAL Instrument.
  41. L Parasuraman,V Berry,Zeithaml (1993). More on improving service quality measurement.
  42. A Parasuraman,Valarie Zeithaml,Leonard Berry (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research.
  43. J Cronin,Steven Taylor (1992). Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension.
  44. Pratibha Dabholkar (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality.
  45. Eleanor Loiacono,Richard Watson,Dale Goodhue (2007). WebQual: An Instrument for Consumer Evaluation of Web Sites.
  46. Jan Mattsson (1992). A Service Quality Model Based on an Ideal Value Standard.
  47. V Landrum,X Prybutok,D Zhang,Peak (2009). Measuring IS system service quality with SERVQUAL: Users' perceptions of relative importance of the five SERVPERF dimensions.
  48. Hollis Landrum,Victor Prybutok,Leon Kappelman,Xiaoni Zhang (2008). SERVCESS: A Parsimonious Instrument to Measure Service Quality and Information System Success.
  49. L Roses,N Hoppen,J Henrique (2009). Management of perceptions of information technology service quality.
  50. A Parasuraman,V Zeithaml,A Malhotra (2005). ES-QUAL a multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality.
  51. V Zeithaml,A Parasuraman,A Malhotra (2000). Conceptual Framework for understanding e-service quality: Implications for future research and managerial practice.
  52. Fenglin Li,Yan Huang (2009). Measuring the Service Quality of Online Bookstore: An Empirical Investigation.
  53. Samar Swaid,Rolf Wigand (2009). The Customer Perspective of E-Service Quality: An Empirical Study.
  54. H.-F Lin (2013). Determining the relative importance of mobile banking quality factors.
  55. L Yitong,S Yun,M Yinian,L Jing,L Qi,Y Dacheng (2013). A study on quality of experience for adaptive streaming service.
  56. Ajimon George,G Kumar (2014). Impact of service quality dimensions in internet banking on customer satisfaction.
  57. Mohammed Alanezi,Ahmad Mahmood,Shuib Basri (2010). Conceptual model for measuring e-government service quality.
  58. A Bikfalvi,J De La Rosa,T Keefe (2013). E-Government Service Evaluation: A Multiple-item Scale for Assessing Information Quality.
  59. C.-W Tan,I Benbasat,R Cenfetelli (2013). ITmediated customer service content and delivery in electronic governments: An empirical investigation of the antecedents of service quality.
  60. Marion Lepmets,Aileen Cater-Steel,Francis Gacenga,Eric Ras (2012). Extending the IT service quality measurement framework through a systematic literature review.
  61. Marion Lepmets,Eric Ras,Alain Renault (2011). A Quality Measurement Framework for IT Services.
  62. D Card,C Jones (2003). Status report: practical software measurement.
  63. W Kettinger,C Lee (1994). Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function*.
  64. L Pitt,R Watson,C Kavan (1997). Measuring information systems service quality: concerns for a complete canvas.
  65. Patrick Asubonteng,Karl Mccleary,John Swan (1996). SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service quality.
  66. Thomas Van Dyke,Leon Kappelman,Victor Prybutok (1997). Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Concerns on the Use of the SERVQUAL Questionnaire1.
  67. Leyland Pitt,Richard Watson,C Kavan (1995). Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness.
  68. P Campbell (1976). Contributions research can make in understanding organizational effectiveness.
  69. Fred Davis (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.
  70. V Venkatesh,J Thong,X Xu (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.
  71. W Delone (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update.
  72. Godwin Udo,Kallol Bagchi,Peeter Kirs (2010). An assessment of customers’ e-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention.
  73. Z Yang,S Cai,Z Zhou,N Zhou (2005). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals.
  74. Darshana Sedera,Guy Gable (2004). Knowledge Management Competence for Enterprise System Success.
  75. Khurram Sharif,Norizan Kassim (2012). Non-academic service quality: comparative analysis of students and faculty as users.
  76. N Kassim,M Zain (2010). Service quality: Gaps in the college of business.
  77. Firdaus Abdullah (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF.
  78. S Ho,K Wearn (1996). A higher education TQM excellence model: HETQMEX.
  79. N Hazilah Abd Manaf,K Ahmad,S Ahmed (2013). Critical factors of service quality in a graduate school of Malaysia.
  80. Burgess (2004). A conceptual framework for understanding and measuring perceived service quality in net-based customer support systems.
  81. A Parasuraman,Valarie Zeithaml,Leonard Berry (1994). Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Further Research.
  82. Darshana Sedera,Guy Gable (2004). Knowledge Management Competence for Enterprise System Success.
  83. Thomas Saaty (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

test. 2015. \u201cFactors for Measurement of ITES Quality for Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 15 (GJCST Volume 15 Issue C3): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Classification
GJCST-C Classification: D.2.9
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 4, 2015

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 8192
Total Downloads: 2085
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Information technology has blessed the current scientific era with the promising initiatives that are un-match able with the past. The range of impact is diversified in nature and massive in scale. Information Technology Enabled Services (ITES) have emerged over time in many disciplines. ITES are becoming increasingly prevalent in the global economy. Due to the growing importance of ITES Service Science has emerged as a fundamental area in Information Systems (IS) research and it combines technical and managerial knowledge under the umbrella of the more popular interdisciplinary approach of Service Science Management and Engineering (SSME). Along with the emergence of the ITES the question to measure the quality has also arisen. The measurement of ITES quality in different areas requires different factors to be considered. This paper addresses the identification of the factors for measuring the quality of ITES in higher education institutes in Saudi Arabia. The paper unleashes number of factors that can be used to measure the quality of ITES in higher education institutions.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Factors for Measurement of ITES Quality for Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia

Romana Aziz
Romana Aziz
Basit Shahzad
Basit Shahzad

Research Journals