Finnish Music Teachersa Perceptions of Rhythmics in Music Education

α
Satu Uusiautti
Satu Uusiautti
σ
Laura Helistekangas
Laura Helistekangas
ρ
Kaarina Maatta
Kaarina Maatta
α University of Lapland University of Lapland

Send Message

To: Author

Finnish Music Teachersa Perceptions of Rhythmics in Music Education

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

9Z1IL

Finnish Music Teachersa Perceptions of Rhythmics in Music Education Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze music teachers’ perceptions of rhythmics and how they use it in music education. They were asked to discuss how they perceive the value of rhythmics and its challenges. Research participants consisted of ten Finnish music teachers who participated in continuing education about rhythmics. They were interviewed and the data were analyzed with the qualitative content analyzing method. The research results showed that teachers found rhythmics a new and challenging area of music education. They had insufficient knowledge of the pedagogical foundation and concepts of rhythmics, even though they had adopted some rhythmics methods in their teaching. According to the findings, teachers were (1) appreciative and enthusiastic, (2) doubtful, or (3) positive but uncertain about using rhythmics. The biggest challenge was the lack of continuing education that would help them learn and employ the contents and methods of rhythmics better in their teaching. Other challenges included difficulties in realizing teaching due to tight teaching premises, students’ heterogeneity, scarce time allocation for music teaching, and lack of usable teaching materials. The study contributes ideas and means to develop music education with rhythmics in Finland.

References

53 Cites in Article
  1. K Ahonen (2004). Johdatus musiikin oppimiseen [Introduction to music learning.
  2. M Anttila (2004). Musiikinopettajan tehtävät [The tasks of a music teacher.
  3. M Bachmann,J Dobbs (1993). Dalcroze today: An education through and into music.
  4. Wayne Bowman (2002). Cognition and the Body: Perspectives from Music Education.
  5. P Desain,H Honing (1999). Computational models of beat induction: The rule-based approach.
  6. L Dutica (2014). Characteristics of Melody and Rhythm in Baghdadi Al-Murabah Songs.
  7. J Chen,V Penhune,R Zatorre (2008). Moving on time: Brain network for auditory synchronization is modulated by rhythmic complexity and musical training.
  8. David Cooper (2009). MUSIC, EDUCATION, AND THE EMOTIONS.
  9. J Creswell (2009). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
  10. Herbert Deutsch (2009). Where Was Technology and Music Education Twenty Years Ago?.
  11. G Dumas,J Laroche,A Lehmann (2014). Your body, my body, our coupling moves our bodies.
  12. D Elliott (1995). Music matters: a new philosophy of music education.
  13. J Frazee,K Kreuter (1987). Discovering Orff: A curriculum for music teachers.
  14. Paul Fraisse (1982). Rhythm and Tempo.
  15. Simon Frith (2008). Why music matters.
  16. Doug Goodkin (2001). Orff-Schulwerk in the New Millennium.
  17. Doug Goodkin (2002). Orff-Schulwerk in the New Millennium.
  18. F Gouyon,S Dixon (2005). A review of automatic rhythm description systems.
  19. Jessica Grahn,Matthew Brett (2007). Rhythm and Beat Perception in Motor Areas of the Brain.
  20. Paul Haack,Michael Smith (2000). Mentoring New Music Teachers.
  21. C Haines (2003). Sequencing, co-ordination and rhythm ability in young children.
  22. David Hargreaves,Ross Purves,Graham Welch,Nigel Marshall (2007). Developing identities and attitudes in musicians and classroom music teachers.
  23. Monica Johnson (1993). Dalcroze Skills for All Teachers.
  24. E Jorgensen (2003). Transforming music education.
  25. M.-L Juntunen (2004). Embodiment in Dalcroze eurhythmics.
  26. H Longuet-Higgins,C Lee (1982). The perception of musical rhythms.
  27. G Marcus (2012). Musicality: Instinct or acquired skill?.
  28. P Mayring (2000). Qualitative content analysis.
  29. V Mead (1986). More than mere movement: Dalcroze eurhythmics.
  30. L Meyer,G Cooper (1960). The rhythmic structure of music.
  31. Mahmoud Elsanhoury,Caner Çuhac,Janne Koljonen,Mohammed Elmusrati (2012). Nonlinear Estimation of Incident Solar Irradiance on Finland Using Discrete-time Extended Kalman Smoothers.
  32. Sungyeol You,Kwangsoon Jeong (2014). Exploring the Role of National Curriculum for Supporting Local level’s Curriculum Development: Focusing on the Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014.
  33. Carl Orff,A Walter (1963). The Schulwerk: Its Origin and Aims.
  34. Aniruddh Patel (2006). Musical Rhythm, Linguistic Rhythm, and Human Evolution.
  35. Jessica Phillips-Silver,C Aktipis,Gregory A. Bryant (2010). The Ecology of Entrainment: Foundations of Coordinated Rhythmic Movement.
  36. Thomas Regelski (2005). Music and Music Education: Theory and praxis for ‘making a difference’.
  37. H Rubin,I Rubin (1995). Qualitative interviewing. The art of hearing data.
  38. H Seppä (2012). Rytmiikka soitonopetuksen rikastuttajana. Kokemus, elämys, ilo.
  39. Shehan Campbell,P (1991). Rhythmic Movement and Public School Music Education: Conservative and Progressive Views of the Formative Years.
  40. D Silverman (2006). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook.
  41. W Sims (1985). Young children's creative movement to music: Categories of movement, rhythmic characteristics, and reactions to changes.
  42. C Small (2011). Music king: The meanings of performing and listening.
  43. Frank Smoll (1974). Development of Spatial and Temporal Elements of Rhythmic Ability.
  44. E Stubley (1998). Being in the body; being in the sound: a tale of modulating identities.
  45. F Styns,L Van Noorden,D Moelants,M Leman (2007). Walking on music.
  46. K Swanwick (2002). A basis for music education.
  47. Rupert Thackray (1969). Rhythmic Abilities and Their Measurement.
  48. J Thomas,D Moon (1976). Measuring motor rhythmic ability in children.
  49. David Weikart,Lawrence Schweinhart (1987). High/Scope Perry Preschool Program.
  50. E Westerlund (2010). Nuottilukihäiriökö ongelma? Oppimishäiriön kohtaaminen soittotunnilla [is dyslexia with music notation a problem? Encountering a learning disability at a music lesson.
  51. L Wheeler,L Raebeck,C Orff,Z Kodály (1977). Orff and Kodaly adapted for the elementary school.
  52. E Zachopoulou,V Derri,D Chatzopoulos,T Ellinoudis (2003). Application of Orff and Dalcroze activities in preschool children: Do they affect the level of rhythmic ability.
  53. E Zachopoulou,A Tsapakidou,V Derri (2004). The effects of a developmentally appropriate music and movement program on motor performance.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Satu Uusiautti. 2016. \u201cFinnish Music Teachersa Perceptions of Rhythmics in Music Education\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 16 (GJHSS Volume 16 Issue G2): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-G Classification: FOR Code: 190499, 930599
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 10, 2016

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4039
Total Downloads: 2031
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The purpose of this study was to analyze music teachers’ perceptions of rhythmics and how they use it in music education. They were asked to discuss how they perceive the value of rhythmics and its challenges. Research participants consisted of ten Finnish music teachers who participated in continuing education about rhythmics. They were interviewed and the data were analyzed with the qualitative content analyzing method. The research results showed that teachers found rhythmics a new and challenging area of music education. They had insufficient knowledge of the pedagogical foundation and concepts of rhythmics, even though they had adopted some rhythmics methods in their teaching. According to the findings, teachers were (1) appreciative and enthusiastic, (2) doubtful, or (3) positive but uncertain about using rhythmics. The biggest challenge was the lack of continuing education that would help them learn and employ the contents and methods of rhythmics better in their teaching. Other challenges included difficulties in realizing teaching due to tight teaching premises, students’ heterogeneity, scarce time allocation for music teaching, and lack of usable teaching materials. The study contributes ideas and means to develop music education with rhythmics in Finland.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Finnish Music Teachersa Perceptions of Rhythmics in Music Education

Laura Helistekangas
Laura Helistekangas
Kaarina Maatta
Kaarina Maatta
Satu Uusiautti
Satu Uusiautti University of Lapland

Research Journals