Food Security as Correlate of Interstate Conflict: A Case Study of the State of Qatar

α
Farukh Mohammad Azad
Farukh Mohammad Azad
σ
Dr. Tim Frazier
Dr. Tim Frazier
ρ
Erik Wood
Erik Wood

Send Message

To: Author

Food Security as Correlate of Interstate Conflict: A Case Study of the State of Qatar

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

NKJYV

Food Security as Correlate of Interstate Conflict: A Case Study of the State of Qatar Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The literature indicates that conflict can result in food insecurity due to economic or political crisis. However, few studies have investigated the effects that nonviolent interstate conflict has on food security in the Middle East. Evidence from this study, based in Qatar, indicates that conflict can result in food insecurity due to economic or political crisis. This research critically examines the lingering political and economic blockade of the State of Qatar and the extent to which this blockade has impacted food security of residents. The study employed a sequential mixed methods approach to gain better insight into the nature of food security in Qatar. A focused qualitative review of the relevant literature was followed by a quantitative analysis which revealed that there was no significant effect of interstate conflict on food security, while the economic and political blockade correlated significantly with food security. Three groups were sampled, including government officials, regulatory agencies, and food suppliers.

References

74 Cites in Article
  1. B Akkaş (2018). Re-Approaching Food Security of Qatar: Challenges and Possibilities.
  2. Chiara Altare,Debarati Guha-Sapir (2013). The Burden of Armed Conflict: A Public-Health Approach.
  3. A Ahmad (2018). Qatar's Strategy for Countering Terrorism: A Human Security Approach.
  4. Hussein Amery (2019). Preface.
  5. James Wangu (2019). From inclusive business to food systems: Enhancing smallholder food security in Africa.
  6. Christoph Dworschak (2016). acled.api: Automated Retrieval of ACLED Conflict Event Data.
  7. Maciej Bartkowski (2013). 1 Recovering Nonviolent History.
  8. S Baas,M Trujillo,N Lombardi (2015). impact of disasters on agriculture and food security.
  9. Marc Bellemare (2015). Rising Food Prices, Food Price Volatility, and Social Unrest.
  10. A Billingsley (2017). The Roots of the Qatar-Saudi Arabia Dispute.
  11. H Brown (2017). Qatar and the GCC: Conflict in Perspective.
  12. J Borkan (2004). Mixed Methods Studies: A Foundation for Primary Care Research.
  13. E Browne (2013). Border insecurity in North Africa.
  14. Tilman Brück,Marco D’errico,Rebecca Pietrelli (2019). The effects of violent conflict on household resilience and food security: Evidence from the 2014 Gaza conflict.
  15. T Brück,N Habibi,C Martin-Shields,A Sneyers,W Stojetz,S Van Weezel (2016). The relationship between food security and violent conflict.
  16. A Bryman (2012). Social Research Methods.
  17. Steven Buigut,Burcu Kapar (2019). Effect of Qatar diplomatic and economic isolation on GCC stock markets: An event study approach.
  18. J Hewitt (1946). Trends in Global Conflict, 1946-2009.
  19. Erica Chenoweth,Kathleen Cunningham (2013). Understanding nonviolent resistance.
  20. Paul Collier,V Elliot,Havard Hegre,Anke Hoeffler,Marta Reynal-Querol,Nicholas Sambanis (2003). Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy.
  21. J Creswell (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
  22. J Creswell,V Clark (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research.
  23. M Croicu,R Sundberg (2017). UCDP GED codebook version 17.
  24. D Dooley (2009). Social Research methods.
  25. Z Dörnyei (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics.
  26. Kristine Eck,Lisa Hultman (2007). One-Sided Violence Against Civilians in War.
  27. Satu Elo,Helvi Kyngäs (2008). The qualitative content analysis process.
  28. S Elo,M Kääriäinen,O Kanste,T Pölkki,K Utriainen,H Kyngäs (2014). Qualitative content analysis.
  29. I Etikan,S Musa,R Alkassim (2016). Comparison convenience sampling and purposive sampling.
  30. (2017). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2018.
  31. (2017). Yemen – Shocks, agricultural livelihoods and food security.
  32. (2011). A Failed Peace.
  33. Justin Gengler,Buthaina Al-Khelaifi (2019). Crisis, State Legitimacy, and Political Participation in a Non-Democracy: How Qatar Withstood the 2017 Blockade.
  34. J Goldstein (2011). Winning the war on war: The surprising decline in armed conflict worldwide.
  35. M Haddadin (2014). Water and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding.
  36. S Hallegatte,M Bangalore,L Bonzanigo,M Fay,T Kane,U Narloch,. Vogt-Schilb,A (2015). Shock waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty.
  37. Eldar Hasandić,Amila Slijepčević,Melika Trako,Aldin Tahirović,Semina Pinjić,Munevera Begić (2019). THE INFLUENCE OF PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY ON THE OVERALL QUALITY OF “VISOČKI SUDŽUK”.
  38. C Holleman,J Jackson,M Sánchez,R Vos (2017). Food Security and Conflict.
  39. S Hussain (2017). Analyzing human behavior toward food waste in Qatar.
  40. R Johnson,Anthony Onwuegbuzie (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come.
  41. Johnson (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of positivism.
  42. (2013). A Micro-Level Perspective on the Dynamics of Conflict, Violence, and Development.
  43. Yaser Khalaileh (2018). The Blockade of Qatar: Where Coercive Diplomacy Fails, Principles of Law Should Prevail.
  44. Fatemeh Kokabisaghi (2018). Assessment of the Effects of Economic Sanctions on Iranians’ Right to Health by Using Human Rights Impact Assessment Tool: A Systematic Review.
  45. Prasad Krishnamurthy,Vikram Pathania,Sharad Tandon (2017). Food Price Subsidies and Nutrition: Evidence from State Reforms to India’s Public Distribution System.
  46. H Kyngäs,S Elo,T Pölkki,M Kääriäinen,O Kanste (2011). Sisällönanalyysi suomalaisessa hoitotieteellisessä tutkimuksessa [The use of content analysis in Finnish nursing science research.
  47. L Lambert,H Hashim (2017). A century of Saudi-Qatari food insecurity: paradigmatic shifts in the geopolitics, economics and sustainability of Gulf states animal agriculture.
  48. (2017). UNITED STATES ANNOUNCES ADDITIONAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE FOR YEMEN.
  49. C Mann (2003). Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies.
  50. Charles Martin-Shields,Wolfgang Stojetz (2018). Food Security As Peacebuilding: Analyzing the Relationship between Food Security and Conflict Data to Support Empirical Policy Making.
  51. Shelley Mcguire (2015). FAO, IFAD, and WFP. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015: Meeting the 2015 International Hunger Targets: Taking Stock of Uneven Progress. Rome: FAO, 2015.
  52. (2017). https://library.wcs.org/en-us/Scientific-Research/Research-Publications/Publications-Library/ctl/view/mid/40093/pubid/DMX5240300000.aspx.
  53. D Mitchell,D Hudson,R Post,P Bell,R Williams (2015). Food security and conflict in food security in an uncertain world.
  54. J Nunnally (1978). Psychometric theory.
  55. J Nunnally,I Bernstein (1994). Psychometric theory.
  56. (2017). Humanitarian response.
  57. G Ostby (2008). Polarization, Horizontal Inequalities and Violent Civil Conflict.
  58. Ulrike Grote (2016). Can we improve global food security? A socio-economic and political perspective.
  59. Therése Pettersson,Peter Wallensteen (2015). Armed conflicts, 1946–2014.
  60. E Piguet (2011). The migration/climate change nexus: An assessment.
  61. S Pinker (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined.
  62. Kelly Robinson,Todd Schmidt,Douglas Teti (2008). Issues in the Use of Longitudinal and Cross‐Sectional Designs.
  63. K Samure,L Given (2008). Convenience Sample.
  64. Nadine Sahyoun,Mark Nord,Anniebelle Sassine,Karin Seyfert,Nahla Hwalla,Hala Ghattas (2014). Development and Validation of an Arab Family Food Security Scale.
  65. Renate Schober,Helen Annis (1996). Barriers to help-seeking for change in drinking: A gender-focused review of the literature.
  66. P Sedgwick (2014). Cross sectional studies: advantages and disadvantages.
  67. Paul Spector (2019). Do Not Cross Me: Optimizing the Use of Cross-Sectional Designs.
  68. A Strachan (2017). Cross-border conflict drivers/break across Sudan, Egypt, and Jordan. Knowledge, evidence, and learning for development.
  69. Anne Swindale,Paula Bilinsky (2006). Development of a Universally Applicable Household Food Insecurity Measurement Tool: Process, Current Status, and Outstanding Issues.
  70. D Tadesse (2012). CAIRO:.
  71. (2015). Ukraine’s Criminal Ecosystem and the War: Ukrainian Organized Crime in 2022. Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC).
  72. (2014). Crisis in the horn of Africa.
  73. (2015). Economic Monitoring Report to the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee.
  74. Gamze Yilmaz,Reef Youngreen (2016). The Application of Minority Influence Theory in Computer-Mediated Communication Groups.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Farukh Mohammad Azad. 2021. \u201cFood Security as Correlate of Interstate Conflict: A Case Study of the State of Qatar\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary GJHSS-H Volume 21 (GJHSS Volume 21 Issue H4): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-H Classification: FOR Code: 090899
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 22, 2021

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2168
Total Downloads: 911
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The literature indicates that conflict can result in food insecurity due to economic or political crisis. However, few studies have investigated the effects that nonviolent interstate conflict has on food security in the Middle East. Evidence from this study, based in Qatar, indicates that conflict can result in food insecurity due to economic or political crisis. This research critically examines the lingering political and economic blockade of the State of Qatar and the extent to which this blockade has impacted food security of residents. The study employed a sequential mixed methods approach to gain better insight into the nature of food security in Qatar. A focused qualitative review of the relevant literature was followed by a quantitative analysis which revealed that there was no significant effect of interstate conflict on food security, while the economic and political blockade correlated significantly with food security. Three groups were sampled, including government officials, regulatory agencies, and food suppliers.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Food Security as Correlate of Interstate Conflict: A Case Study of the State of Qatar

Farukh Mohammad Azad
Farukh Mohammad Azad
Dr. Tim Frazier
Dr. Tim Frazier
Erik Wood
Erik Wood

Research Journals